-
I am on the rock and then I check a stock
I have to run like a fugitive to save the life I live
I'm gonna be Iron like a Lion in Zion
I'm gonna be Iron like a Lion in Zion
-
THE OIL WELLS ARE SECURE!
Woo hoo!
The war is a success!Comment
-
excuse me?
But it's all about the oil. That's what they keep saying. It's about the oil.
Now here you go saying it's all about the Jews.
Ok, it's about oil and it's about Jews. Let's nail it down this time once and for all. Before we go on is there ANYTHING else it's about or can we go with 'Jews and Oil' with some degree of confidence?
Now, is it 50% all about the Jews and 50% about oil? Or would you say 30% about oil and 70% the Jews? More? Less?I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!Comment
-
Its about the oily jews.Originally posted by Mutt
excuse me?
But it's all about the oil. That's what they keep saying. It's about the oil.
Now here you go saying it's all about the Jews.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gutterboy
Its about the oily jews.
Comment
-
Why don't you look at the big picture instead of buying the government line?Originally posted by Mutt
excuse me?
But it's all about the oil. That's what they keep saying. It's about the oil.
Now here you go saying it's all about the Jews.
Ok, it's about oil and it's about Jews. Let's nail it down this time once and for all. Before we go on is there ANYTHING else it's about or can we go with 'Jews and Oil' with some degree of confidence?
Now, is it 50% all about the Jews and 50% about oil? Or would you say 30% about oil and 70% the Jews? More? Less?
I know it's hard and it makes your brain hurt but why don't you try anyway!Comment
-
hahawe'll miss you our friend. RIPComment
-
it is about 99% of jews who control 100% of oil
Comment
-
Originally posted by Joe Sixpack
Why don't you look at the big picture instead of buying the government line?
I know it's hard and it makes your brain hurt but why don't you try anyway!
Try applying a little common sense?
Comment
-
Ahh, I C.Originally posted by Shoplifter
And if there is any doubt about who pulls the strings in this war....
http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/03/30/spr...ell/index.html
See you in Zion.
Well then, let's have a look at who's "pulling the strings" on the other side shall we?....
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,81314,00.html
Oh my...scandal!!Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!
ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!!
Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket. ICQ me at: 31024634Comment
-
So the left is anti-war and the right love war.Originally posted by CDSmith
Ahh, I C.
Well then, let's have a look at who's "pulling the strings" on the other side shall we?....
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,81314,00.html
Oh my...scandal!!
Did you think you were telling us something new?
PS Foxnews! Bwahahahahaahahahahaahahaha!Comment
-
Originally posted by Joe Sixpack
So the left is anti-war and the right love war.
Did you think you were telling us something new?
PS Foxnews! Bwahahahahaahahahahaahahaha!
Maybe he was just trying to teach you there are two sides to every story....
But I'm sure he's not been the first one who's tryed that with little success.Comment
-
Quoting Fox News is about as credible as quoting the International Socialist News Weekly.Originally posted by DavePlays
Maybe he was just trying to teach you there are two sides to every story....
But I'm sure he's not been the first one who's tryed that with little success.
I didn't see two sides in that article!
Comment
-
Originally posted by DavePlays
Maybe he was just trying to teach you there are two sides to every story....
But I'm sure he's not been the first one who's tryed that with little success.
There is only one side and that Joe's Free Thinking Side.
You are with him or against him and if you are against him you will suffer the consequences.
What?s the matter Joe? Couldn?t take the heat in the other thread or did you just feel the need to spread you bullshit around to some other threads?Comment
-
Why? Because <i>YOU</i> say so?Originally posted by Joe Sixpack
Quoting Fox News is about as credible as quoting the International Socialist News Weekly.
BWAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAAHA!!!!!!
Like some boardtard named joesuxpack is credible
I'm really trying to argue on your level here genius Joe.Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!
ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!!
Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket. ICQ me at: 31024634Comment
-
Like many Fox News articles, its long on biased, fact free insinuations, and short on facts. For example..
Now, what exactly do they mean by "supports Fidel Castro"? Do they say that because IFCO supports ending the Cuban embargo? That is hardly supporting Castro. Do they mean the group really did support Castro by giving him money or something? No, because if they did you can bet would have said so. Insinuations, not facts."Not in Our Name is financed by the Interreligious Foundation for Community Organization. I.F.C.O. is a million-dollar-a-year non-profit that supports Cuban dictator Fidel Castro and once sponsored a group headed by Sami Al-Arian ? the University of South Florida professor being charged with fundraising for terrorist organizations Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad"
Using that standard of evidence to establish "ties", the Bush adminsitration has "ties" to every right wing lunatic religious group on the planet. How often do you hear Fox News reporting *that*? Again, insinuations, not evidence.A.N.S.W.E.R. is an offshoot of the International Action Center, which intelligence officials say is a front for the Worker's World Party. A.N.S.W.E.R. canceled a scheduled interview with Fox News but a worker in the Seattle field office acknowledged there are ties.
"There are some Workers World Party members in A.N.S.W.E.R.," said A.N.S.W.E.R. coordinator Jim McMahan
Most of the article consists of similar vague insinuations.. just specific enough that someone predisposed to right wing paranoia would draw the worst conclusions, yet not specific enough to contain any actual facts about the extent of the WWWP's financial support of peace protests
Notice how the Bay Area anti-war Veterans group gets mentioned.. but only 3/4 the way down the article, and never as a supporter of the movement, which they most certainly are.Last edited by Gutterboy; 03-30-2003, 09:24 PM.Comment
-
Originally posted by DavePlays
Maybe he was just trying to teach you there are two sides to every story....
But I'm sure he's not been the first one who's tryed that with little success.
Originally posted by Joe Sixpack
Quoting Fox News is about as credible as quoting the International Socialist News Weekly.
I didn't see two sides in that article!
Thank you....
You just proved my point perfectly.
I rest my case.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Gutterboy
Like many Fox News articles, its long on biased, fact free insinuations, and short on facts. For example..
Using that standard of evidence to establish "ties", the Bush adminsitration has "ties" to every right wing lunatic religious group on the planet. Again, insinuations, not evidence.
Most of the article consists of similar vague insinuations.. just specific enough that someone predisposed to right wing paranoia would draw the worst conclusions, yet not specific enough to contain any actual facts about the extent of the WWWP's financial support of peace protests
Notice how the Bay Area anti-war Veterans group gets mentioned.. but only 3/4 the way down the article, and never as a supporter of the movement, which they most certainly are.
Yeah Yeah Yeah - and my Daddy liked Chevys and your Daddy liked Fords.... Big fucking deal. YOUR news is better than MY news....
I'm sorry - but none of that proves anything more than you have cutting and pasting down to a science.Comment
-
Originally posted by dirtyone
There is only one side and that Joe's Free Thinking Side.
You are with him or against him and if you are against him you will suffer the consequences.
What?s the matter Joe? Couldn?t take the heat in the other thread or did you just feel the need to spread you bullshit around to some other threads?
I know - but he's so easy.
Like shooting fish in a barrel...
Comment
-
News is supposed to consist of reporting facts, not polemic. Bad news will mix facts and polemic. That article took it to a whole other level by trying to convince the reader that polemic is fact.Originally posted by DavePlays
Yeah Yeah Yeah - and my Daddy liked Chevys and your Daddy liked Fords.... Big fucking deal. YOUR news is better than MY news....
You may be unable or unwiling to discern between the two, thats fine. Just so we know where you stand.Comment
-
Originally posted by Gutterboy
News is supposed to consist of reporting facts, not polemic. Bad news will mix facts and polemic. That article took it to a whole other level by trying to convince the reader that polemic is fact.
You may be unable or unwiling to discern between the two, thats fine. Just so we know where you stand.
Right - I'm the one standing here saying there are two sides to every story - and it's been a few decades since national or world news was not been "editorialized" to one degree or another. They ALL do it - you might not notice if you are hearing only what you want to hear.
I watch CNN, FOX, NBC, and BBC and read the local paper. There are two TVs on here all day long. You might try getting a little variety of news yourself - there REALLY are two sides to the story.Comment
-
Oh my, all the Jew haters must be up in arms !!!Originally posted by Shoplifter
http://www.cnn.com/2003/US/03/30/spr...ell/index.html
See you in Zion.
Mr Powell having to go to talk to a bunch of Jews to explain what the USA is doing
Did you know that the Jews in the US owned around 30% of the GNP ???
So, all of you Jew hater, it's time to move to Iraq
...Comment
-
Comment