What Would Clinton Do ? - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

Brujah

Beer Money Baron

Join Date: Jan 2001

Posts: 22157
Share

Post
#1

What Would Clinton Do ?

03-25-2003, 01:33 PM

Would another president have done differently?

Before laying all the blame at Mr. Bush's door, consider this little slice of history.
In 1998, after years of evasion and deception, Mr. Hussein had stopped co-operating with United Nations weapons inspectors. The U.S. president at the time called Iraq an "outlaw nation," and urged the international community to take strong action.
If "we fail to act, or we take some ambiguous third route which gives him yet more opportunities to develop his weapons of mass destruction ... he will conclude that the international community has lost its will." The result, he said, would be disastrous. "Some day, some way, I guarantee you, he'll use the arsenal."

The name of the president? Bill Clinton.

http://www.globeandmail.com/servlet/.../International

Free Premium Domain Lists and Tools at Clickmojo.com

For Sale: Obscenity.com
Tags: None
dig420

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 9240
Share

Post
#2

03-25-2003, 01:34 PM

yeah except Clinton was actually capable enough to get the support of other countries for his actions.
Comment
rooster

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 2384
Share

Post
#3

03-25-2003, 01:36 PM

yea so capable he bypassed the un when he bombed yogoslavia because he knew he wouldnt have got the votes.

Thats what bush should have done, but powell was stabbed in the back by the french.

Ever notice that pretty much everything added to the Constitution after the original was a mistake.
Comment
Sly_RJ

Live Hard - Die Hard

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 17042
Share

Post
#4

03-25-2003, 01:36 PM

Originally posted by dig420
yeah except Clinton was actually capable enough to get the support of other countries for his actions.

Holy shit, we actually agree.

PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price!
sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144
Comment
dig420

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 9240
Share

Post
#5

03-25-2003, 01:38 PM

Clinton was always an expert at bringing together disparate opinions
Comment
directfiesta

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 30188
Share

Post
#6

03-25-2003, 01:38 PM

Originally posted by rooster
yea so capable he bypassed the un when he bombed yogoslavia because he knew he wouldnt have got the votes.

It's called "standard procedure".

I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....
Comment
Sly_RJ

Live Hard - Die Hard

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 17042
Share

Post
#7

03-25-2003, 01:40 PM

Originally posted by dig420
Clinton was always an expert at bringing together disparate opinions

Clinton was great at lying to get his way. Bush isn't.

PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price!
sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144
Comment
hottoddy

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 3049
Share

Post
#8

03-25-2003, 01:40 PM

Originally posted by dig420
yeah except Clinton was actually capable enough to get the support of other countries for his actions.

Like what, getting his dick sucked (well he was on the phone with Arafat) ?

- *** -
Comment
ChrisH

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2001

Posts: 1355
Share

Post
#9

03-25-2003, 01:41 PM

Originally posted by rooster
yea so capable he bypassed the un when he bombed yogoslavia because he knew he wouldnt have got the votes.

Thats what bush should have done, but powell was stabbed in the back by the french.

Facts... Facts.... What do you expect these posters to care about facts?

To busy yealling about oil.

Just like the Muslim countries that try to say it's a war on Islam. They neglect to look at the action in Bosnia where muslims were being killed by the thousands.

Add Your Niche Sites
Add Your Shemale Sites/Galleries
Talk About the NFL
Comment
dig420

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 9240
Share

Post
#10

03-25-2003, 01:45 PM

Originally posted by Sly_RJ

Clinton was great at lying to get his way. Bush isn't.

Bullshit. All politicians are expert liars. The question is what are they gonna lie ABOUT. I'll take lies over blowjobs compared to Bush's lies about everything anyday.
Comment
rooster

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 2384
Share

Post
#11

03-25-2003, 01:46 PM

dig, you are a perfect example of why the democrat party has gone to hell and is very divided.

Ever notice that pretty much everything added to the Constitution after the original was a mistake.
Comment
Sly_RJ

Live Hard - Die Hard

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 17042
Share

Post
#12

03-25-2003, 01:51 PM

Originally posted by dig420

Bullshit. All politicians are expert liars. The question is what are they gonna lie ABOUT. I'll take lies over blowjobs compared to Bush's lies about everything anyday.

You're joking, right?

You think Bush is a good liar? He tricks you into believing lies?

Either you're <i>really</i> gullible or you're just arguing to defend Clinton.

PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price!
sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144
Comment
TheJimmy

ICQ- five seven 0 2 5 5 0

Join Date: Jan 2001

Posts: 10747
Share

Post
#13

03-25-2003, 01:54 PM

Originally posted by dig420
yeah except Clinton was actually capable enough to get the support of other countries for his actions.

you know I wasn't a total Clinton fan, but he definitely had some strong suits, and THAT was one of them for sure!

Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.
Comment
jas1552

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2002

Posts: 1462
Share

Post
#14

03-25-2003, 01:55 PM

Originally posted by dig420

Bullshit. All politicians are expert liars. The question is what are they gonna lie ABOUT. I'll take lies over blowjobs compared to Bush's lies about everything anyday.

Yeah we all know except for lying about blowjobs Clinton was a pillar of honesty.

BTW if your own family can't trust you why should anyone else?
Comment
jas1552

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2002

Posts: 1462
Share

Post
#15

03-25-2003, 01:57 PM

Originally posted by dig420
yeah except Clinton was actually capable enough to get the support of other countries for his actions.

Refresh my memory. When did Clinton rally UN support for taking action?
Comment
JeremySF

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2002

Posts: 1236
Share

Post
#16

03-25-2003, 01:59 PM

I admire Clinton simply for the fact that he got his dick sucked in the Oral Office.

ICQ: 176050593 / AIM: JerSF2000

"Love is the answer - but while you're waiting for the answer sex raises some pretty good questions."
---------------------------------------------
Comment
ThunderBalls

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 2926
Share

Post
#17

03-25-2003, 02:03 PM

Originally posted by Sly_RJ

You're joking, right?

You think Bush is a good liar? He tricks you into believing lies?

Either you're <i>really</i> gullible or you're just arguing to defend Clinton.

No, Bush is a terrible liar. Which proves to me how stupid people like you really are to believe his bullshit.
Comment
sweetcuties

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 5859
Share

Post
#18

03-25-2003, 02:06 PM

I miss Clinton
Comment
Sly_RJ

Live Hard - Die Hard

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 17042
Share

Post
#19

03-25-2003, 02:08 PM

Originally posted by ThunderBalls

No, Bush is a terrible liar. Which proves to me how stupid people like you really are to believe his bullshit.

You're a sharp one, aren't you?

I just stated Bush is a terrible liar. Meaning you can see when he's talking out of his ass and when he's adamant about something.

But thanks for the "stupid" compliment. Have anything else up your sleeve?

PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price!
sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144
Comment
ThunderBalls

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 2926
Share

Post
#20

03-25-2003, 02:48 PM

Originally posted by Sly_RJ

You're a sharp one, aren't you?

Yes I am, thanks for noticing.

Originally posted by Sly_RJ

I just stated Bush is a terrible liar. Meaning you can see when he's talking out of his ass and when he's adamant about something.

Uh, no, you didnt state he is a terrible liar. Your exact words were You think Bush is a good liar?
And since he is ALWAYS talking out of his ass you are dumber than I originally thought.
Comment
Sly_RJ

Live Hard - Die Hard

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 17042
Share

Post
#21

03-25-2003, 02:51 PM

Originally posted by ThunderBalls

Uh, no, you didnt state he is a terrible liar. Your exact words were You think Bush is a good liar?
And since he is ALWAYS talking out of his ass you are dumber than I originally thought.

Try reading the context.

PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price!
sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144
Comment
Torn Rose

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2003

Posts: 752
Share

Post
#22

03-25-2003, 03:38 PM

Originally posted by dig420

Bullshit. All politicians are expert liars. The question is what are they gonna lie ABOUT. I'll take lies over blowjobs compared to Bush's lies about everything anyday.

ICQ# 123278082
Comment
jas1552

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2002

Posts: 1462
Share

Post
#23

03-25-2003, 04:32 PM

What would Clinton do? Nothing. He had plenty of opportunity when Saddam kicked out inspectors. He bombed for a few days and then let Saddam get away with it.
Comment
Gutterboy

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 4751
Share

Post
#24

03-25-2003, 04:40 PM

Clinton would have continued his policy of containment and sanctions.. with occasional bombings of military infrastructure & weapons plants when Saddam got uppity.

I like how some people try to blame this conflict on Clinton. What a crock. Lets get it right, George Bush and only George Bush is the reason we are at war.

Not Clinton, not Clinton's policies.

There is no more evidence that Saddam is a threat to the US now than there was at the beginning of W's term. He didn't want to bomb Saddam then, in fact he showed no indications of doing anything other than continuing Clinton's policies until 9/11. Those are the facts. The 'war on terror' is just a convenient cover for him to take out Saddam.

And as for Bush's lies... Bush and his senior administration have been lying repeatedly and profusely for the last year, both to the American public, the UN and many other nations, about Saddam being a threat to the U.S.

Last edited by Gutterboy; 03-25-2003, 04:47 PM.
Comment
jas1552

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2002

Posts: 1462
Share

Post
#25

03-25-2003, 04:46 PM

Originally posted by Gutterboy
Clinton would have continued his policy of containment and sanctions.. with occasional bombings of military infrastructure & weapons plants when Saddam got uppity.

I like how some people try to blame this conflict on Clinton. What a crock. Lets get it right, George Bush and only George Bush is the reason we are at war.

Not Clinton, not Clinton's policies.

There is no more evidence that Saddam is a threat to the US now than there was at the beginning of W's term. He didn't want to bomb Saddam then, in fact he showed no indications of doing anything other than continuing Clinton's policies until 9/11. Those are the facts. The 'war on terror' is just a convenient cover for him to take out Saddam.

Look at North Korea and judge for yourself how well containment and sanctions work. The people are starving and the government is building nukes.

If Clinton hadn't been weak and put real pressure on Saddam right after he kicked out inspectors we probably wouldn't be where we are today.
Comment
dig420

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 9240
Share

Post
#26

03-25-2003, 04:48 PM

conservatives have been trying to blame Clinton for everything including the weather because they're terrified he's going to go down in history as a great president. that's the entire reason for Kenneth Starr and all that other bullshit.

they not only play hardball, they're fanatics.
Comment
Gutterboy

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 4751
Share

Post
#27

03-25-2003, 04:49 PM

Originally posted by jas1552

Look at North Korea and judge for yourself how well containment and sanctions work. The people are starving and the government is building nukes.

If Clinton hadn't been weak and put real pressure on Saddam right after he kicked out inspectors we probably wouldn't be where we are today.

lol. Lets try this again... be sure to read it slowly so it sinks in..

Saddam is no worse a threat to the US today than he was when he was ejected from Kuwait in 1991.

Nothing has gotten worse.

This "crisis" was entirely manufactured by the Bush administration.

We are in this situation because W. decided he wanted to use the war on terror as an excuse to play out a personal vendetta against Hussein. No other reason.

Last edited by Gutterboy; 03-25-2003, 04:55 PM.
Comment
jas1552

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2002

Posts: 1462
Share

Post
#28

03-25-2003, 04:54 PM

Originally posted by Gutterboy

lol. Lets try this again... be sure to read it slowly so it sinks in..

Saddam is no worse a threat to the US today than he was ejected from Kuwait.

Nothing has gotten worse.

This "crisis" was entirely manufactured by the Bush administration.

We are in this situation because W. decided he wanted to use the war on terror as an excuse to play out a personal vendetta against Hussein. No other reason.

Read the first post in this thread. Specifically Clintons quote. Clinton sure seemed to think Saddam was a big threat. Clinton could talk a good game but he was all talk and no action. Bush actually turned Clinton's rhetoric into action.
Comment
Gutterboy

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 4751
Share

Post
#29

03-25-2003, 04:57 PM

Originally posted by jas1552

Read the first post in this thread. Specifically Clintons quote. Clinton sure seemed to think Saddam was a big threat. Clinton could talk a good game but he was all talk and no action. Bush actually turned Clinton's rhetoric into action.

Two words: North Korea

What is Bush doing about that? Nothing. No action, just promises they'll be a "dipomatic solution"

Gee, sounds a bit like Clinton? Wonder why?

Did North Korea build nukes, reactivate its reactors and begin saber rattling under Clinton? No. They did it specifically to make Bush's posturing about "premption" foolish.. and they succeeded.

Bush is only a "man of action" when it comes to non-threatening dictators of barely above 3rd world status, starving nations.

To do something useful, you have to deal effectively with real threats. Saddam never was a threat.

When Bush does something useful for the US, its economy, and the real threats it faces.. something besides pretending his is a cowboy and blowing up starving ragheads.. I'll take notice.

Maybe he could start with catching Bin Ladin?

Last edited by Gutterboy; 03-25-2003, 05:02 PM.
Comment
jas1552

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2002

Posts: 1462
Share

Post
#30

03-25-2003, 05:12 PM

Originally posted by Gutterboy

Did North Korea build nukes, reactivate its reactors and begin saber rattling under Clinton? No. They did it specifically to make Bush's posturing about "premption" foolish.. and they succeeded.

Actually yes they were building nukes when Clinton was president. We only found out about it later and when we called them on it I guess they got embarrassed and started their sabre rattling.

Originally posted by Gutterboy
Saddam never was a threat.

Are you calling Clinton a liar?
Comment
Gutterboy

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 4751
Share

Post
#31

03-25-2003, 05:23 PM

Originally posted by jas1552

Are you calling Clinton a liar?

Henry Hyde once said that "Lying is part and parcel of the game of politics."

Of course Clinton is a liar. All politicians are liars to one degree or another. As a previous poster said, the only thing you need to be concerned about is what the policitican in question is lying about.

With Clinton he lied about getting a blowjob to hide it from his wife.

With Bush he lied about Saddam being an imminent threat to hide the general faliure of his war on terror and take out a personal vendetta on Saddam.

He also lied about his preemption doctrine, because it is obvious now.. in light of Kim Jong Il making Bush look like a bitch.. that it was just an arbitrary, once off thing to justify invading Iraq.

In other words, we STILL don't have a coherent foreign policy, nor much of a domestic one either.

Remember how it used to be about a guy named Osama? Probably not, which is the precisely the point.
Comment
jas1552

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2002

Posts: 1462
Share

Post
#32

03-25-2003, 05:26 PM

I'll rephrase the question. Is Clinton a liar for saying the following.
"Some day, some way, I guarantee you, he'll use the arsenal."
Comment
rooster

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 2384
Share

Post
#33

03-25-2003, 05:30 PM

Daschle said the same things about Sadaam in 98 like Clinton did. And now he think Sadaam is a great guy and no threat.

It furthur illustrates how the lefts objections to this has mainly to do with partisan politics.

I give credit to guys like Liberman who arent playing those games.

Last edited by rooster; 03-25-2003, 05:32 PM.

Ever notice that pretty much everything added to the Constitution after the original was a mistake.
Comment
jimmyf

OU812

Join Date: Feb 2001

Posts: 12651
Share

Post
#34

03-25-2003, 05:33 PM

Originally posted by rooster
dig, you are a perfect example of why the democrat party has gone to hell and is very divided.

This is sooooooooooooo true, I don't think you know how true. I know they don't have a clue. I like, same with talk radio, they don't get it why so many people listen, don't have a fucking clue.
just watch what they post now

Epic CashEpic Cash works for me
Solar Cash Paysite Plugin
Gallery of the day freesites,POTD,Gallery generator with free hosting
Comment
Gutterboy

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 4751
Share

Post
#35

03-25-2003, 05:33 PM

Originally posted by jas1552
I'll rephrase the question. Is Clinton a liar for saying the following.
"Some day, some way, I guarantee you, he'll use the arsenal."

Saddam is a threat to Israel, maybe the Kurds, Iran etc. So Clinton was probably right.

When I said Saddam is not a threat, I meant a threat in the only sense that should IMHO be used to justify war.. an imminent threat to the United States.

Despite the fact that Bush and his adminsitration have lied and spun relentlessly over the past year, Saddam is not, and never has been, a threat to the United States.

The breadth of Bush's campaign of deception is easy to see. A recent Gallup poll showed that close to 1/2 of those surveyed believed Saddam had some role in 9/11. Why do they believe that? Hard evidence? There is none. Circumstantial evidence.. hmm.. none of that either. Because they've been fed a steady diet of Bush adminsitration lies and half truths? 'Fraid so.

Don't get me wrong, this war will probably be good for the Iraqi people.. assuming they welcome us "liberating" them.. but its being fought for the wrong reasons.
Comment
nuclei

old school fart

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 1015
Share

Post
#36

03-25-2003, 05:42 PM

Originally posted by ThunderBalls

Uh, no, you didnt state he is a terrible liar. Your exact words were You think Bush is a good liar?
And since he is ALWAYS talking out of his ass you are dumber than I originally thought.

Ummm actually he was saying bush IS a shitty liar. read the context.

The next generation of SEO
Comment
dig420

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 9240
Share

Post
#37

03-25-2003, 05:50 PM

Originally posted by jimmyf

This is sooooooooooooo true, I don't think you know how true. I know they don't have a clue. I like, same with talk radio, they don't get it why so many people listen, don't have a fucking clue.
just watch what they post now

I am so proud I could bust to belong to the party that educated people prefer. The party that prefers an open court system, seperation of religion and state and believes in an individual's right to privacy.

I am proud that I'm not so gullible that I can be convinced to vote for the party that repeatedly says it wants to put me in jail for what I do, the party that counts David Duke and Pat Robertson and G. Gordon Liddy and Oliver North among it's most prominent members. The party that tells women they can't decide for themselves whether they can have an abortion, the party that is campaigning for secret courts and the 'Patriot' act, the party that wants to be tough on crime and put pot smokers in prison.

The same party where secret degenerates like John Ashhahahahaha wrap themselves in the flag and drape a cloak over Lady Liberty's breast, where they believe in confiscating your car if they find a joint in it because 'the car is guilty of a crime'. The party that wants the right to hold suspects without benefit of representation indefinitely and that wants the right to phone and wiretap everyone without having to ask permission from a Judge and then present the evidence in a secret court. The party of the 'morally upright and holy' who wants to force every kid to stand in lockstep and recite the pledge of allegiance when they're damn well told to. The party that wants to force me to live in a police state based on biblical principles, brought to you by the Moral Majority and the Republicans.

Keep voting for them you Repubs and conservatives, hope you enjoy the confiscated property and cozy little jail cell you'll get for your troubles.

Last edited by dig420; 03-25-2003, 05:53 PM.
Comment
ThunderBalls

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 2926
Share

Post
#38

03-25-2003, 06:30 PM

Originally posted by dig420

I am so proud I could bust to belong to the party that educated people prefer. The party that prefers an open court system, seperation of religion and state and believes in an individual's right to privacy.

I am proud that I'm not so gullible that I can be convinced to vote for the party that repeatedly says it wants to put me in jail for what I do, the party that counts David Duke and Pat Robertson and G. Gordon Liddy and Oliver North among it's most prominent members. The party that tells women they can't decide for themselves whether they can have an abortion, the party that is campaigning for secret courts and the 'Patriot' act, the party that wants to be tough on crime and put pot smokers in prison.

The same party where secret degenerates like John Ashhahahahaha wrap themselves in the flag and drape a cloak over Lady Liberty's breast, where they believe in confiscating your car if they find a joint in it because 'the car is guilty of a crime'. The party that wants the right to hold suspects without benefit of representation indefinitely and that wants the right to phone and wiretap everyone without having to ask permission from a Judge and then present the evidence in a secret court. The party of the 'morally upright and holy' who wants to force every kid to stand in lockstep and recite the pledge of allegiance when they're damn well told to. The party that wants to force me to live in a police state based on biblical principles, brought to you by the Moral Majority and the Republicans.

Keep voting for them you Repubs and conservatives, hope you enjoy the confiscated property and cozy little jail cell you'll get for your troubles.

Very well said.
Comment
FlyingIguana

aspiring banker

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 10870
Share

Post
#39

03-25-2003, 06:47 PM

Originally posted by dig420
yeah except Clinton was actually capable enough to get the support of other countries for his actions.

if he would have said lets go into baghdad and take saddam out of power he would have met the same opposition.
Comment
DaDee

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 116
Share

Post
#40

03-26-2003, 08:16 AM

The same party where secret degenerates like John Ashhahahahaha wrap themselves in the flag and drape a cloak over Lady Liberty's breast, where they believe in confiscating your car if they find a joint in it because 'the car is guilty of a crime'.
Comment
TurboTrucker

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 2363
Share

Post
#41

03-26-2003, 08:43 AM

I am so proud I could bust to belong to the party that educated people prefer. The party that prefers an open court system, seperation of religion and state and believes in an individual's right to privacy.

- The party that poor people prefer
- The party that thinks people should be able to sue McDonalds because they're fat
- Should individuals have the right to plot attacks against us if they're plotting in privacy?

I am proud that I'm not so gullible that I can be convinced to vote for the party that repeatedly says it wants to put me in jail for what I do, the party that counts David Duke and Pat Robertson and G. Gordon Liddy and Oliver North among it's most prominent members. The party that tells women they can't decide for themselves whether they can have an abortion, the party that is campaigning for secret courts and the 'Patriot' act, the party that wants to be tough on crime and put pot smokers in prison.

- Jail for porn, like that will happen - for one thing it's way too big of a legitimate business
- Jesse Jackson is on your side
- You think women should have the right to murder other individuals - as long as they created them. I do to, it prevents the spread of their moronic genes.

The same party where secret degenerates like John Ashhahahahaha wrap themselves in the flag and drape a cloak over Lady Liberty's breast, where they believe in confiscating your car if they find a joint in it because 'the car is guilty of a crime'. The party that wants the right to hold suspects without benefit of representation indefinitely and that wants the right to phone and wiretap everyone without having to ask permission from a Judge and then present the evidence in a secret court. The party of the 'morally upright and holy' who wants to force every kid to stand in lockstep and recite the pledge of allegiance when they're damn well told to. The party that wants to force me to live in a police state based on biblical principles, brought to you by the Moral Majority and the Republicans.

- I'm all for the legalization of Cannabis
- Nobody is forced to pledge allegance to our country, however if you're not willing to you should get the fuck out of here.

Keep voting for them you Repubs and conservatives, hope you enjoy the confiscated property and cozy little jail cell you'll get for your troubles.
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...