Quote:
Originally posted by pamphage
so you are saying it's all a legal thing and morality is irrelevant?
|
You are reading things into my words that aren't there. I said nothing about whether one or the other was morally wrong, I was pointing out (from a legal standpoint of course) that you seemed to be confusing these two very different things as being the same. They aren't.
As for my moral viewpoint, I'm 40. A YOUNG 40 of course :D , but still, old enough that jumping a 16 yr old in all probablity isn't part of my plan for living. But most of these guys here are in the 20-30 range, thus it is not outside the realm of possibility that a hot 16 yr old might entice them at some point.
Again, doing underage content of ANY kind that involves any sort of sexuality is illegal, so bringing up the dani-girl thing wasn't the best analogy here. But the law of most states and countries says that it is okay for a 16 yr old to be having consentual sex in their private lives, morality notwithstanding.