...will not be the last found. It is just the first. It will take some time I am sure to establish what was being produced there, but being out in the middle of no where and apparently being camouflaged I would assume that they were not producing aspirin.
The Chemical Plant that was discovered today
Collapse
X
-
The Chemical Plant that was discovered today
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlTags: None -
Sky News:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The facility was found in Najaf, around 225 miles south of Baghdad, US military officials say.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reuters:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
chemical weapons about 100 miles south of Baghdad, Fox News reported on Sunday.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jerusalem Post:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
huge installation apparently used to produce chemical weapons in An Najaf, some 250 kilometers south of Baghdad.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
They can't even have the same distance from Baghdad!
- 225 miles
- 100 miles
- 250 km
Reliable sources!I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time .... -
the tree huggers will concoct some half baked bullshit story from a dream they had about saving the penguins to deny it was a chem plant.... Saddam wouldn't lie.SIG TOO BIGComment
-
-
Probably used to make baby food. Iraq (apparently) produces more baby food than the rest of the world combined.Comment
-
250 kilometers = 160 miles. 60 miles give or take between two of the reports. Everyone wants to be first to press, a difference in the number of miles reported does not invalidate the report. At least try to come up with something good if you want to ignorantly insist that Iraq wasn't up to anything.Originally posted by directfiesta
Sky News:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The facility was found in Najaf, around 225 miles south of Baghdad, US military officials say.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Reuters:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
chemical weapons about 100 miles south of Baghdad, Fox News reported on Sunday.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jerusalem Post:
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
huge installation apparently used to produce chemical weapons in An Najaf, some 250 kilometers south of Baghdad.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
They can't even have the same distance from Baghdad!
- 225 miles
- 100 miles
- 250 km
Reliable sources!
SpaceAceComment
-
Yep...and they camouflage their baby food production facilities...because of industrial spys...the French.Originally posted by DC1
Probably used to make baby food. Iraq (apparently) produces more baby food than the rest of the world combined.When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
I did not " insist " that Iraq wasn't up to anything.Originally posted by SpaceAce
250 kilometers = 160 miles. 60 miles give or take between two of the reports. Everyone wants to be first to press, a difference in the number of miles reported does not invalidate the report. At least try to come up with something good if you want to ignorantly insist that Iraq wasn't up to anything.
SpaceAce
I just showed how reliable and accurate the news reports are.
On the other hand, if "give or take 60 miles " isn't of an issue, why was much less numbers an issue for missiles....I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....Comment
-
jesus.... every single thing out of your mouth is complete and utter fucking stupidity.... just when I think you can't possibly get any dumber... you do!Originally posted by directfiesta
I did not " insist " that Iraq wasn't up to anything.
I just showed how reliable and accurate the news reports are.
On the other hand, if "give or take 60 miles " isn't of an issue, why was much less numbers an issue for missiles....
SIG TOO BIGComment
-
this is a true statement.Originally posted by theking
Yep...and they camouflage their baby food production facilities...because of industrial spys...the French.
Epic CashEpic Cash works for me
Solar Cash Paysite Plugin
Gallery of the day freesites,POTD,Gallery generator with free hostingComment
-
Saddam's "private stock"...which he will not need much longer, assuming that he is still currently alive.Originally posted by hyper
its a Viagra PlantWhen you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!
FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.htmlComment
-
I'm not sure what you're referring to. I don't remember a big deal being made about a discrepency in the number of missiles used. Even if there IS a discrepency in reports, I would say it still isn't a big deal. War is war for a reason: it's confusing and scary and it's going 24 hours a day. How accurately can missile usage be measured? A discrepency could be caused simply by reporting a number while a handful ships still hadn't filed their reports. At the end of the war, they'll be able to tell us how much of what oridnance was used, but not necessarily during the conflict.Originally posted by directfiesta
On the other hand, if "give or take 60 miles " isn't of an issue, why was much less numbers an issue for missiles....
As for the miles, it still doesn't matter. If one says 200 miles and one says 100 miles and someone else gives a different number in kilometers, so what? 99% of that kind of thing is caused by <B>everyone</B> wanting to go to print before everyone else. My girlfriend is a journalist and I know how much trouble that causes. By tomorrow or the next day, they'll have it worked out and their numbers will match more closely. The important thing is whether or not the plant exists and they ALL agree on that.
SpaceAceComment


Comment