Should GFY Charge For People To Have Sigs?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Stud Money
    So Fucking Banned
    • Sep 2003
    • 3214

    #1

    Should GFY Charge For People To Have Sigs?

    I know i would pay to have a sig if it meant that TCG sig whores were not able to post meaningless replies to threads just to earn an additional $0.25

    What do you think? Still being able to post but only those who have paid for the privellage can use sigs?
  • polish_aristocrat
    Too lazy to set a custom title
    • Jul 2002
    • 40377

    #2
    They should charge $10 monthly for posting.
    And f.e $25 for premium status ( private messages enabled ).
    I don't use ICQ anymore.

    Comment

    • Peter Romero
      Long time no happy ending
      • Feb 2003
      • 10604

      #3
      Originally posted by Stud Money
      I know i would pay to have a sig if it meant that TCG sig whores were not able to post meaningless replies to threads just to earn an additional $0.25

      What do you think? Still being able to post but only those who have paid for the privellage can use sigs?
      You should have to pay to have yours... it's faggy & stoopid felcher boy.


      [email protected]

      See them all here: https://www.Petergirls.com

      Comment

      • klik
        Confirmed User
        • Nov 2001
        • 5092

        #4
        choke on my quarters beeeyatch

        Comment

        • SomeCreep
          :glugglug
          • Mar 2003
          • 26118

          #5
          Yes, GFY should charge $100 dollars for each post your sig appears in.

          Webair Hosting

          I use and recommend Webair for hosting.

          Comment

          • Spunky
            I need a beer
            • Jun 2002
            • 133978

            #6
            They should just charge you

            Comment

            • anidifranco
              So Fucking Banned
              • Feb 2003
              • 711

              #7
              No, GFY wouldn't have any posts without sigs.

              Comment

              • AWC
                Confirmed User
                • Aug 2001
                • 1223

                #8
                ban sigs altogether and turn IMs on

                Comment

                • SureFire
                  Confirmed User
                  • Jan 2003
                  • 4398

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Stud Money
                  I know i would pay to have a sig if it meant that TCG sig whores were not able to post meaningless replies to threads just to earn an additional $0.25

                  What do you think? Still being able to post but only those who have paid for the privellage can use sigs?
                  No comment?No, I lied you should pay for your sig since it is false advertising for the women on this board.

                  Comment

                  • kenny
                    Confirmed User
                    • Mar 2002
                    • 7245

                    #10
                    Somebody would abuse the IMs with spam bots or something similar

                    I have turned all sigs off in my user options
                    7

                    Comment

                    • - AFN -
                      Confirmed User
                      • Jun 2003
                      • 3101

                      #11
                      Originally posted by Stud Money
                      I know i would pay to have a sig if it meant that TCG sig whores were not able to post meaningless replies to threads just to earn an additional $0.25

                      What do you think? Still being able to post but only those who have paid for the privellage can use sigs?
                      Nahhhh, page views would tank.
                      cat cash* | tr -d '\r' | tr -s '/n' > money

                      Comment

                      Working...