After United States basicaly told United Nations to go fuck themselfs he has a nerve to brag that Iraqi military dont treat US prisoners according to Geneva convention.
-
-
the Geneva convention has nothing ot do wit hthe UN so shut your fucking hole bitch and stop starting dumbass threads.... ALL OF YOU. SUCK MY MANCOCK. -
Actually I was amused at the one comment Rumsfeld made.. I got a Borg Flashback... "Resistance is futile".
I am dyslexic of borg, your ass will be laminated.Comment
-
from the mouths of moronsOriginally posted by DarkJedi
After United States basicaly told United Nations to go fuck themselfs he has a nerve to brag that Iraqi military dont treat US prisoners according to Geneva convention.Comment
-
You stupid fuck, Geneva convention is an Internation Law Act.
So is United Nation resolutions. USA is a member of United Nations and UN didn't approve this war. So USA and UK broke the international law.Comment
-
SO according to you.... Once you break a law all other laws are thrown our the window???Originally posted by DarkJedi
You stupid fuck, Geneva convention is an Internation Law Act.
So is United Nation resolutions. USA is a member of United Nations and UN didn't approve this war. So USA and UK broke the international law.
Please go have a logic shake and come back when your feeling well again.Comment
-
Anybody see him on Meet the Press this morning? He was sweating... the current situation doest sound to good right now.Comment
-
international law..
the UN is like having criminals have a say in who gets arrested..
Comment
-
wow what clever responses you come up with monkeyOriginally posted by MonkeyMan
the Geneva convention has nothing ot do wit hthe UN so shut your fucking hole bitch and stop starting dumbass threads.... ALL OF YOU. SUCK MY MANCOCK.Comment
-
WHen your right you don't need to be clever.Originally posted by Filter
wow what clever responses you come up with monkeyComment
-
Originally posted by MonkeyMan
SO according to you.... Once you break a law all other laws are thrown our the window???
Please go have a logic shake and come back when your feeling well again.
WTF are you talking about ?
USA broke the International Law and now they bitch that Iraq doesn't play by the rules.Comment
-
Originally posted by MonkeyMan
WHen your right you don't need to be clever.
Try evolving Monkey Man.Comment
-
Your wife is deadOriginally posted by Joe Sixpack
Try evolving Monkey Man.
Hahahahahahahaha.Comment
-
Hahaha I see that.Originally posted by MonkeyMan
WHen your right you don't need to be clever.
Someone give this guy a banana and a place in a protected home before he hurts others or himself.Comment
-
hypocrits. they expect iraq to follow what the UN says, but they don't have to.Originally posted by DarkJedi
After United States basicaly told United Nations to go fuck themselfs he has a nerve to brag that Iraqi military dont treat US prisoners according to Geneva convention.
the geneva convention wasn't from the UN i don't believeComment
-
The US and UK have NOT broken ANY International Laws.
UN Resolution 678 gives the US and her allies FULL permission to go into Iraq and use whatever means necessary to rid the country of weapons that go against the UN resolutions... resolution 687 specifically tells us to CONTINUE using whatever means necessary to enforce 678.
Those resolutions were never revoked.
If you're going to run your mouth, know what the fuck you're talking about.Comment
-
Carrie: didn't the Bush administration refuse to follow the Geneva Convention with regards to Al Qaeda and Taliban prisoners?Comment
-
I SEE 4 LIGHTS!!!!!!!Originally posted by LadyMischief
Actually I was amused at the one comment Rumsfeld made.. I got a Borg Flashback... "Resistance is futile".
I am dyslexic of borg, your ass will be laminated.Spam link hereComment
-
you are the one talking out of your ass.Originally posted by Carrie
The US and UK have NOT broken ANY International Laws.
UN Resolution 678 gives the US and her allies FULL permission to go into Iraq and use whatever means necessary to rid the country of weapons that go against the UN resolutions... resolution 687 specifically tells us to CONTINUE using whatever means necessary to enforce 678.
Those resolutions were never revoked.
If you're going to run your mouth, know what the fuck you're talking about.
UN Resolution 678 was adopted by the UN Security Council at its 2963rd meeting on 29 November 1990
Comment
-
Shusssssssshhhhh..... Silence please...... Quiet .... ( no, not youOriginally posted by Gutterboy
Carrie: didn't the Bush administration refuse to follow the Geneva Convention with regards to Al Qaeda and Taliban prisoners?
) .
The US haven't declare war to Afghanistan ( that is their official response ... lol ). So why the soldiers in Afghanistan ????I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....Comment
-
LOL....Originally posted by Dildozer
I SEE 4 LIGHTS!!!!!!!Comment
-
Ouch!!!!Originally posted by DarkJedi
you are the one talking out of your ass.
UN Resolution 678 was adopted by the UN Security Council at its 2963rd meeting on 29 November 1990
BTW Carrie, are you blond???I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !
But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....Comment
-
Serge?Originally posted by MonkeyMan
Your wife is dead
Hahahahahahahaha.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Carrie
The US and UK have NOT broken ANY International Laws.
UN Resolution 678 gives the US and her allies FULL permission to go into Iraq and use whatever means necessary to rid the country of weapons that go against the UN resolutions... resolution 687 specifically tells us to CONTINUE using whatever means necessary to enforce 678.
Those resolutions were never revoked.
If you're going to run your mouth, know what the fuck you're talking about.
mmh, that had to do with the Kuwait invasion.... nothing with suspecting Iraq of having weapon of mass destuction...Comment
-
You are an idiot...Originally posted by DarkJedi
After United States basicaly told United Nations to go fuck themselfs he has a nerve to brag that Iraqi military dont treat US prisoners according to Geneva convention.Comment
-
Originally posted by greentea
You are an idiot...
Hmmm ....good argument.Comment
-
I saw video on MSNBC yesterday of a reporter walking around Iraqi POW's and putting the camera right into their faces. One guy had a blanket over his head and the cameraman got down low to look up into the guys face. The reporter even walked up to a POW and picked up some of his person things and showed them to the camera. There were US soldiers escorting the reporter around the POW's.
Cant find the video on MSNBC.com now.. it was there yesterday.Old SchoolComment
-
I also saw this video but it was on cnn last night. The reporter was pointing out that they had slippers and one was eating army rations, which he picked up and showed the cameraOriginally posted by Zebra
I saw video on MSNBC yesterday of a reporter walking around Iraqi POW's and putting the camera right into their faces. One guy had a blanket over his head and the cameraman got down low to look up into the guys face. The reporter even walked up to a POW and picked up some of his person things and showed them to the camera. There were US soldiers escorting the reporter around the POW's.
Cant find the video on MSNBC.com now.. it was there yesterday.Comment
-
Originally posted by DarkJedi
You stupid fuck, Geneva convention is an Internation Law Act.
So is United Nation resolutions. USA is a member of United Nations and UN didn't approve this war. So USA and UK broke the international law.
- *** -Comment
-
BwahahahhahahahahahahaahhOriginally posted by Dildozer
I SEE 4 LIGHTS!!!!!!!Comment
-
Can I steal that line from you? Keep in mind that no matter what you answer, I'll steal it from you anyways.Originally posted by MonkeyMan
Please go have a logic shake and come back when your feeling well again.
But everytime I use it, I'll give you credit.
"Hey idiot, go have a logic shake and call me when you feel better. (MonkeyMan)"
Bad Girl Bucks - 50% Revshare through CCBill.
Promote BrandyDDD, Pixie's Pillows, Action Allie and more!
Phoenix Forum Pics | Webmaster Access Montreal pics
email: psyko514(a)gmail.com | icq: 214-702-014Comment
-
Let's just hope that Iraq considers them POWs and *not* "illegal combatants".Comment
-
actually you just backed her arguement up 100%Originally posted by DarkJedi
you are the one talking out of your ass.
UN Resolution 678 was adopted by the UN Security Council at its 2963rd meeting on 29 November 1990
The resolution was adopted giving definate timelines and allowing for military action if not met. This resolution was never revoked, meaning it is still in effect today. The US did not go against the UN at all, seeing as this resolution was either unanimously agreed upon by all delegates or damn close to all of them.The next generation of SEOComment
-
The UN is a joke and waste of money. The US alone pays 25% of their operations. Countries can break laws and they don't do shit!Comment
-
Hello ? after that resolution had been adopted, the action was taken - the Gulf War.Originally posted by nuclei
actually you just backed her arguement up 100%
The resolution was adopted giving definate timelines and allowing for military action if not met. This resolution was never revoked, meaning it is still in effect today. The US did not go against the UN at all, seeing as this resolution was either unanimously agreed upon by all delegates or damn close to all of them.
A week ago UN had a new resolution that US and UK refused to vote on and just invaded Iraq.Comment
-
Hello??
and has already been noted in another thread "france" was already on to veto the new resolution immediately. Which is why it was not voted on. why bother when you know its not going thru?
The existing resolution was all that was written up til then. That resolution is just being enforced. I dont particularly like the way bush has done a lot of things, but saying the govt was doing something illegal attacking is just wrong. Their real reasons for war may be wrong, but they had legal right to enforce that resolution.The next generation of SEOComment
-
They dont need international support or permission to invade Iraq. They just wanted it. I think giving the Iraqi military a warning reguarding captured US/British soilders was fair enough.7Comment
-
Your free trade script is not working.... http://www.pileofturds.comOriginally posted by MonkeyMan
I suck DaLord's cock cause I'm a small timer
That's humor...Comment
-
Originally posted by nuclei
Hello??
and has already been noted in another thread "france" was already on to veto the new resolution immediately. Which is why it was not voted on. why bother when you know its not going thru?
The existing resolution was all that was written up til then. That resolution is just being enforced. I dont particularly like the way bush has done a lot of things, but saying the govt was doing something illegal attacking is just wrong. Their real reasons for war may be wrong, but they had legal right to enforce that resolution.
1 country (france) can not veto a resolution and make it not pass.
All countries vote on a resolution. And US/UK/Spain just started the war without any voting because they knew other countries would vote against that war.Comment
-
whether what the US/UK is doing is against International Law is a moot point. There is no court to try the case (no thanks to the US
).
There are many "experts" who claim Intl law has been broken, and many who claim it hasn'tComment
-
Jedi...
First search for the ceasefire agreements that Iraq signed
Second Search for what a ceasefire MEANS
Third, Search for WHO the Iraqi's signed the ceasefire WITH
Fourth, Have your humble pie quietly
(You'll learn more if YOU search them out instead of whining for links to be handed to you AND you might even learn to research before you make yourself out to be an expert and then turn into a fool)
And solly Chalie, ONE country CAN Veto ANY resolution in front of the Security Council, IF they are one of the permenent nations.
Who made FRANCE one (perm member) is beyond me tho. Must have been an inside joke that has backfired.
I think France AND Russia have some tallllll 'splaining to do and very soon too!<center><a target="_blank" href="http://dev.datedollars.com/index.php?s=signup&aid=535&cfg=aac"><img border="0" src="http://216.130.172.224/gfy/gsig.gif" width="490" height="100"></a><br><a href="http://dev.datedollars.com/index.php?s=signup&aid=535&cfg=aac" target="_blank"><b><font face="Arial"><font color="#FF99FF"> Buy me away from Slavedriver Smokey!<br>It's May Sig Sweeps!<font></b></center>Comment
-
oh and by the way the UN security council is formed. There is no way the security council can find US or UK in breach of UN resolutions because they can automatically veto anything that goes through there
Comment
-
Thanks Gemini, I was just looking for where I had seen that bit that you said =POriginally posted by Gemini
And solly Chalie, ONE country CAN Veto ANY resolution in front of the Security Council, IF they are one of the permenent nations.
[/B]The next generation of SEOComment
-
These guys want to espouse all sorts of nonsense about the UN and related things Nuclei, but so far not many of them have been even in the ballpark with their rants. Its a shame that someone who was taught this BS in High School TWENTY TWO YEARS ago has hung onto more of the knowledge than they bothered to learn.
Last edited by Gemini; 03-24-2003, 01:54 AM.<center><a target="_blank" href="http://dev.datedollars.com/index.php?s=signup&aid=535&cfg=aac"><img border="0" src="http://216.130.172.224/gfy/gsig.gif" width="490" height="100"></a><br><a href="http://dev.datedollars.com/index.php?s=signup&aid=535&cfg=aac" target="_blank"><b><font face="Arial"><font color="#FF99FF"> Buy me away from Slavedriver Smokey!<br>It's May Sig Sweeps!<font></b></center>Comment
-
there, you said it.
USA invaded Iraq knowing that France was going to veto agains the war. They didnt get green light from the UN security council.Comment
-
Originally posted by DarkJedi
there, you said it.
USA invaded Iraq knowing that France was going to veto agains the war. They didnt get green light from the UN security council.
The fact is the resolution never made it to vote. Whatever the reason is not even relevant due to the previous resolution giving the US full power to attack.
Period.
Argue all you wish, but it will not change the facts.
Have fun arguing with yourself in this thread
The next generation of SEOComment
-
Geneva Convention... Guantanomo Bay... hmmm.Comment
Comment