The 1st chemical bomb explodes - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

dantheman

OG

Join Date: May 2002

Posts: 3308
Share

Post
#1

The 1st chemical bomb explodes

03-17-2003, 09:47 AM

If iraq chooses to use chemical weapons on the invading troops, will everyone (nations) then agree that saddam is a liar and cannot be trusted at all?
He's been saying there's no such weapons that they have all been destroyed.

M3server.com
VPS>Get your 2nd month free
Ded>$100 off your 2nd month
since 1996
icq-25135623
dannyh at~m3server DOT com
Tags: None
LiveDose

Show Yer Tits!

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 25792
Share

Post
#2

03-17-2003, 09:53 AM

Nope unfortunately they will spin it and say that Bush provoked it.

There won't be any mention of his violations...

Sad, very sad.

Scammer Alert: acer19 acer [email protected] [email protected] Money stolen using PayPal
Comment
Va2k

I’m still alive barley.

Join Date: Oct 2001

Posts: 10060
Share

Post
#3

03-17-2003, 09:53 AM

I really hope it don't get that far, I would hate to see chems used in this shit ass war. I feel sorry for the iraqs that are going to die just as I feel bad for our troops that are going to die and suffer! FUCK this really sucks donkey piss ya know I am wondering whats going to happen over here in the usa once the war starts? Are we doomed? are they going to fuck us up as they have been telling us? I hate bush I wish bush dead but I agree we need to take sadam out, I liked clinton personaly oh and ass hahahahaha I think I hate worse then bush. Maybe if i wasnt peddleing porn I wouldn't hate as much eh?

TOM
Comment
ronaldo

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2002

Posts: 5475
Share

Post
#4

03-17-2003, 09:55 AM

Originally posted by LiveDose
Nope unfortunately they will spin it and say that Bush provoked it.

There won't be any mention of his violations...

Sad, very sad.

Don't agree.

If he uses any chemical or biological weapons, the US will confront the rest of the world and say "Where the fuck are you now chickenshits, you see we were right, now get your asses over here".

All but the French will respond with troops.
Comment
foreverjason

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2003

Posts: 1452
Share

Post
#5

03-17-2003, 09:56 AM

Who knows what could happen. We have shit filled countries like France in the world, anything is possible.
Comment
[Labret]

Registered User

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 10945
Share

Post
#6

03-17-2003, 10:03 AM

Even if they Saddam doesnt have any, I am sure they will conveniently "find" some.

This war is only justified by Bush on 2 levels. Liberating the poor Iraqi people, and (as much as I hate to use the buzzword of the fucking century) weapons of mass distraction.

If Johnny soldier does not march into Baghdad and receive a welcome that rivals that of the the heros welcome the allies marching into Paris received, Bush fails.

If no chemical or biological weapons are found, he fails.

They will be found. They HAVE to be found.
Comment
AaronM

GFY Royality ;)

Join Date: Oct 2001

Posts: 46917
Share

Post
#7

03-17-2003, 10:04 AM

Originally posted by dantheman
If iraq chooses to use chemical weapons on the invading troops, will everyone (nations) then agree that saddam is a liar and cannot be trusted at all?
He's been saying there's no such weapons that they have all been destroyed.

Forget about Iraq.....We are manufacturing this stuff in the US!

http://gofuckyourself.com/showthread...hreadid=116564
Comment
bikinihouse

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 843
Share

Post
#8

03-17-2003, 10:08 AM

Originally posted by dantheman
If iraq chooses to use chemical weapons on the invading troops, will everyone (nations) then agree that saddam is a liar and cannot be trusted at all?
He's been saying there's no such weapons that they have all been destroyed.

The world will admit that they were wrong in assessing Saddam if he unleashes 'illegal' chemical weapons, how could they say they were right?

Chances are that Saddam will unleash chemical weapons, because he probably does own them. If he doesn't, I'm sure the USA would mimmick him using them just so they can 'show the world' that they were right.

War is war though, there is no right or wrong in the way you kill someone... whether from gas or from a bullet, you'll still die. I don't like how they say it's illegal to use gas. For fucks sake, it's war.. if the US is going to attack Iraq, you're taking that risk. It's not like the US isn't going to use depleated uranium. lol

I expect a lot of surprises out of this war, and I'm already feeling sorry for both Iraqi, American, and UK soldiers... many will die.

Remember, no war has rules.
Comment
Amputate Your Head

There can be only one

Join Date: Aug 2001

Posts: 39075
Share

Post
#9

03-17-2003, 10:10 AM

eh... who fucking cares anymore. The next episode of ER is more interesting than Iraq.

SIG TOO BIG
Comment
DarkJedi

No Refunds Issued.

Join Date: Feb 2001

Posts: 28301
Share

Post
#10

03-17-2003, 10:11 AM
Comment
directfiesta

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 30198
Share

Post
#11

03-17-2003, 10:11 AM

Originally posted by [Labret]
weapons of mass distraction.

Hehe... " distraction "....

I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....
Comment
The Porn Dude

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2003

Posts: 369
Share

Post
#12

03-17-2003, 10:14 AM

Originally posted by [Labret]
Even if they Saddam doesnt have any, I am sure they will conveniently "find" some.

This war is only justified by Bush on 2 levels. Liberating the poor Iraqi people, and (as much as I hate to use the buzzword of the fucking century) weapons of mass distraction.

If Johnny soldier does not march into Baghdad and receive a welcome that rivals that of the the heros welcome the allies marching into Paris received, Bush fails.

If no chemical or biological weapons are found, he fails.

They will be found. They HAVE to be found.

werd

SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.
Comment
rooster

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 2384
Share

Post
#13

03-17-2003, 10:16 AM

I think the only people loyal to sadaam are his republican guard or whatever its called, and Ive heard even their morale is low.

The rest of the people are starving and once they see the writing on the wall, why would they fight hard for saddam. Traditonally these people arent even good fighters any way.

Ever notice that pretty much everything added to the Constitution after the original was a mistake.
Comment
[Labret]

Registered User

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 10945
Share

Post
#14

03-17-2003, 10:19 AM

Originally posted by rooster

Traditonally these people arent even good fighters any way.

Tell that to the Iranians, Kuwaitis, Kurds, and Shiites. Made the Saudi Arabians shit their pants. If it were not for the United States (and other assorted "allies"), the whole Arabian Peninsula would be called Iraq. And evidently we find them a big enough threat. Or do we?

Is it like beating up a crippled retarded child, or fighting a world class army? If its not a world class army, then viewing them as a threat is a joke. Which is it?

Last edited by [Labret]; 03-17-2003, 10:21 AM.
Comment
rooster

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 2384
Share

Post
#15

03-17-2003, 10:20 AM

yea, they beat up on people with little or no millitary.

Ever notice that pretty much everything added to the Constitution after the original was a mistake.
Comment
[Labret]

Registered User

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 10945
Share

Post
#16

03-17-2003, 10:22 AM

Originally posted by rooster
yea, they beat up on people with little or no millitary.

Iran had no army? I suggest you crack one of your readers digest book club books and look up the Iran/Iraq war.

better yet, show some dignity and leave the thread. How can one person suffer so much humiliation on a daily basis and yet keep coming back for more?

Last edited by [Labret]; 03-17-2003, 10:25 AM.
Comment
playa

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2001

Posts: 6432
Share

Post
#17

03-17-2003, 10:23 AM

Originally posted by rooster
I think the only people loyal to sadaam are his republican guard or whatever its called, and Ive heard even their morale is low.

very true the Republican Guard were not the ones giving up freely in the Gulf War, they fought hard and died very well for their country
Comment
directfiesta

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 30198
Share

Post
#18

03-17-2003, 10:28 AM

Originally posted by [Labret]

Iran had no army? I suggest you crack one of your readers digest book club books and look up the Iran/Iraq war.

better yet, show some dignity and leave the thread. How can one person suffer so much humiliation on a daily basis and yet keep coming back for more?

Because ROOSTER aside from being braindead , he is also a masochist....

I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....
Comment
SpaceAce

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 6493
Share

Post
#19

03-17-2003, 12:18 PM

Originally posted by ronaldo

Don't agree.

If he uses any chemical or biological weapons, the US will confront the rest of the world and say "Where the fuck are you now chickenshits, you see we were right, now get your asses over here".

All but the French will respond with troops.

Sorry, but that is unrealistic. If they don't ALREADY know he is a lying, dangerous sack of shit, one more act won't change their minds. Are any nations really stupid enough to believe that he has been stonewalling inspectors for the last decade because he's not hiding anything? Please.

SpaceAce
Comment
Mr.Fiction

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 9484
Share

Post
#20

03-17-2003, 12:20 PM

Originally posted by rooster
yea, they beat up on people with little or no millitary.

Are you talking about the U.S. or Iraq?

Think about it.

Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA
Comment
ronaldo

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2002

Posts: 5475
Share

Post
#21

03-17-2003, 12:27 PM

Originally posted by SpaceAce

Sorry, but that is unrealistic. If they don't ALREADY know he is a lying, dangerous sack of shit, one more act won't change their minds. Are any nations really stupid enough to believe that he has been stonewalling inspectors for the last decade because he's not hiding anything? Please.

SpaceAce

Actually, this goes with something else I was saying somewhere else.

I think the nations that are pretending he doesn't have anything are quite frankly, scared. Scared of the suicide bombings that will inevitably hit ANY nation that supports this war.

They think that by standing up to the U.S. that the terrorists will take note and cross them off of their hit list.

They are humming and hawing all the while waiting for the U.S. to destroy him. This way, they can say they opposed the war and be the so called keepers of the peace.

You're right, these nations all KNOW he has them. They just don't want to fight him. They're hoping the U.S. kicks his ass and Saddam doesn't pull out those weapons.

Because if he does, the French et al. are gonna have alot of explaining to do to the world. Not just to the U.S.

They'll have to admit they were chicken shit.
Comment
Fletch XYX

Registered User

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 69
Share

Post
#22

03-17-2003, 12:29 PM
Comment
Cash

Click on my TCG signature

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 20825
Share

Post
#23

03-17-2003, 12:41 PM

Originally posted by dantheman
If iraq chooses to use chemical weapons on the invading troops, will everyone (nations) then agree that saddam is a liar and cannot be trusted at all?
He's been saying there's no such weapons that they have all been destroyed.

This is Saddam's dilemma.

$9.95/month for 15000 GB bandwidth monthly, unlimited (sub)domains and MySQL5, PHP4/5, 500 GB disk storage! ; use any of these invitation codes: 216263692101; 408636009193; 846090586647; my ICQ 30160426!
Comment
merlin

Registered User

Join Date: Jul 2001

Posts: 97
Share

Post
#24

03-17-2003, 12:48 PM

No matter if ya agree or not with a war chances are Sadam has chemical weapons, he has "played games" with inspectors for years.
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...