Originally posted by Mr.Fiction One reason is because most of the big sites have been around for a longtime and they are afraid to change their design because it's working.
The most popular TGPs are usually old, from the days when every free site was ugly. And now that they have a large base of bookmarkers (ie people like it), there's no sense in changing the look or feel of the site.
Originally posted by Mr.Fiction One reason is because most of the big sites have been around for a longtime and they are afraid to change their design because it's working.
I've had the same design since '96 and I'll be the first to admit it sucks but everytime I change it to something more appealing my signups go down and I end up going back to the original, its something I could never figure out.
simple sells. Lots of graphical sites lost their way and lost their usability. Bottom line, we are selling pussy here (or cock for the gay guys) and not fucking art pieces.
It is all about usability and turning on the surfer fast.
Hell, I would not promote most of these major paysites with your traffic let alone mine. Too much $$ spend on a designer and no money spent on a true Internet marketer and usabiltiy expert.
Just my 2 strokes
Mogul
Mogul Networks Inc.
MogulPass.com Free AVS system that pays $30 per free signup, $5 per referred sale, has Promoter Sites you can just send traffic to and more.
ContentLotto.com Win free content, hosting, design, traffic, lotto sites, cash and more instanty.
Adult Check did a survey of their users not too long ago. They asked them what they want in a porn site, and what factors contributed most to their joining. The quality and quantity of the porn itself were tops by a huge margin, not the design & graphics. Its good porn and lots of it people want to see, not pretty logo's.
The real reason is that the surfer wants the site to load fast -- lots of surfers are still on dialup... If it's a trading site especially, productivity will be higher if the site loads fast -- and usually that means VERY MINIMAL graphics...
This is all changing with the movie site guys or guys that trade on picture links... movie surfers are generally high bandwidth surfers, but I think some of them go overboard with images. Some of these movie archive sections have so many pics that my browser crashes. Just a tip for those movie guys -- you don't want the surfer's browser to crash EVER, even if it's 5% of surfers that's still lost revenue.
Originally posted by Mogul simple sells. Lots of graphical sites lost their way and lost their usability. Bottom line, we are selling pussy here (or cock for the gay guys) and not fucking art pieces.
It is all about usability and turning on the surfer fast.
Hell, I would not promote most of these major paysites with your traffic let alone mine. Too much $$ spend on a designer and no money spent on a true Internet marketer and usabiltiy expert.
Just my 2 strokes
Mogul
Mogul Networks Inc.
Most of the older sites aren't in kind terms with usability, I can tell you that.
Originally posted by Gutterboy Adult Check did a survey of their users not too long ago. They asked them what they want in a porn site, and what factors contributed most to their joining. The quality and quantity of the porn itself were tops by a huge margin, not the design & graphics. Its good porn and lots of it people want to see, not pretty logo's.
Originally posted by xdcdave plain = nonthreatening
Someone giving away porn with a $10,000 site design looks suspecious (sp?). Just my
Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.
Originally posted by Gutterboy Adult Check did a survey of their users not too long ago. They asked them what they want in a porn site, and what factors contributed most to their joining. The quality and quantity of the porn itself were tops by a huge margin, not the design & graphics. Its good porn and lots of it people want to see, not pretty logo's.
but surely this doesn't apply to tgp galleries, or does it? I thought the more enticing and professional the gallery look - the higher the conversion all other things being equal?
but surely this doesn't apply to tgp galleries, or does it? I thought the more enticing and professional the gallery look - the higher the conversion all other things being equal?
I disagree.
You can have a well designed attractive gallery with hideous content and very few people are going to click on the link to even get to the paysite. How can you sell them the paysite if you show them shitty content? Enticing content is far more important than design in my opinion.
Apparently, based on ICQ chats with some program operators, the same observation is true with paysites. "Pretty" or "Slick" or "High Tech" does not necessarily CONVERT. Amateurish type designs often convert better because it is tied to the uniqueness of the content--which should be the main selling point of any site.
You can have a well designed attractive gallery with hideous content and very few people are going to click on the link to even get to the paysite. How can you sell them the paysite if you show them shitty content? Enticing content is far more important than design in my opinion.
but all things being equal - as in you are using the same content lets say - will the design of the gallery ever make a significant difference is my question?
okay kinda slightly off topic here but if loading fast is the key then why are the TGP's with thumbnail previews so popular? surely it would take longer to load on a 56k dialup than one with just text links?
Snazzy
<font size="1"> SnazzyTGP.com Visit this site now or I'll kill you</font>
Originally posted by Snazzy okay kinda slightly off topic here but if loading fast is the key then why are the TGP's with thumbnail previews so popular? surely it would take longer to load on a 56k dialup than one with just text links?
I guess the hassle of load time is offset by the benefit of seeing a sample image from the gallery thereby saving time ultimately
Those who have been doing this long enough understand that understanding your market, simple design and GOOD 100% exclusive content = 10 times more sales. When you count the conversions at the end of the day the bullshit stops. Simple as that.
Originally posted by Snazzy okay kinda slightly off topic here but if loading fast is the key then why are the TGP's with thumbnail previews so popular? surely it would take longer to load on a 56k dialup than one with just text links?
My guess is that it's because most of the surfers arrive at the TGP via a traffic-script link which promised them a gallery. Thumbnail previews make the TGP look like a giant gallery, so they feel like they got what they expected. Whereas if they end-up with a text-based TGP (when they expected a gallery) they're more likely to feel like they've been conned and close the window or backout.
It is simple plain sites do not do better than fancy sites.
The reason for a sites success is holistic not specific, if a plain site is doing better than a fancy site it is because of a thousand and one other reasons not just the presentation. For every successful plain site you can find you will find at least ten successful ?fancy? sites.
If you are looking for that elusive success paradigm then presentation is only one part of the gestalt.
Comment