I don't think they look underage...and as for the pillows they make me think COLLEGE...as in hot college coeds living in a dorm and having pillow fights during study sessions...isn't that the way the fantasy goes?
I think more of it has to do with marketting than the girls themselves. Lightspeed goes out of their way to say "18 year old" or "19 year old" all over the sites, banners, and other promotional material.
You want to shit on something, shit on those people doing the "mature lady inexperienced boy" sites. THAT is marketing based on suggesting that the models are perhaps less than legal.
I love the way people throw around pedo accusations.. In 99.9% of the cases a pedo targets PRE-TEENS. that's a REAL pedo.. Now, are you gonna tell me that any of the lightspeed girls look like 12 or below? or hell, even 13, 14, 15, 16? But yet there are all these people who make idiotic accusations and other bullshit while there are many sites out there with actual pre-teens just posing nude yet the US law says that's ok? and dont tell me it's not because Ive reported countless sites like that and was always told the same shit "We can't do anything. They are no breaking any laws"
But yet, when it comes to regular. legal porn we have to be even more careful?? and the pedos have more rights then we do? Oh yes, the gov. is looking out for the children.. BULLSHIT!
It just makes me laugh that lets say me, a 29 year old goes fuck an 18 year old I would have many people calling me a pedo.. lol.. Perhaps people should think before they speak as not to make themselves look like ignorant fucks..
Fogot too add that when did a pillow fight all of a sudden imply child porn? so i guess if you were at a party and there were many drunk girls that decided to pillow fight naked you would call every guy checking them out a pedo? lol even teddy bears don't imply that.. christ, some 40 years old have a shit load of teddy bears.. a lot of girls/women like that shit.
but i guess its perfectly ok for sears or walmart or whatever other place to sell skimpy panties for girls 6 to 12? And skimpy bikinis for girls 6 to 12? now is the gov gonna blame us because young kids dress slutty? not our fault and still the parents buy the shit for them and still whine about all the porn on the net? Fucking hypocrites. More worried about their kids seeing porn then their kids getting stalked or .... by a pedos due to the skimpy clothing YOU bought for them.. Oh but WE are the root of all evil.. We're just the easiest to target and blame
Originally posted by Krome I know this makes money and that the guys have made fortunes with this but I think this is porn that has been designed for the peadofile. I am not knocking it, it is legal I know people that get paid big cash from Lightspeed.
And surprisingly they are all having pillow fights. It is like the guys who put teddy bears in shoots etc...
Legal porn for the peado but hey who gives a fuck we are making money from them...
What are you fuckin nuts
Not one of the girls in that pic looks underage or is presented that way...Why don't you go fuck with Max Hardcore or some other asshole who really does go after the SICK market...
Steve and his crew are straight up and don't need to keep hearing the same BULLSHIT over and over again in thread after thread
Girls can look young and still be of age...Look at 75% of the 18 yr old seniors in high school now of days. They don't have to look like used up old whores to be in porn and look of age..
and I personally would rather look at porn of innocent looking LEGAL girls rather then some used up pornstar.. does that make me a pedo? NO! BUT the way I see it is that most of the people complaining about all this pedo shit do so in order to hide the fact that they have had thoughts of being with underage girls..
Originally posted by BradShaw I have said it before, will say it again. IMHO Lightspeeds business model is based on catering to pedophiles. I believe last time I said it, Steve said I would be hearing from his lawyer for stating my opnion. I guess his lawyer is still tied up, like KB's.
Brad, someone asked this question in the other thread, what is your REAL issues with Steve and it certainly ain't just his business model or you would be on some of the other assholes in this industry who really go after the pedophile market???
I said if they actually showed 18 year old girls doing what they actually did which is not having pillow fights but is snorting coke and drinking then they would be in trouble...
ARE YOU FUCKIN CRAZY OR WHAT...YOU NEED FUCKIN
I have an 18yr old daughter in college and in their dorm they not only have pillow fights, as I found out on parent weekend, all the girls have a teddy bear or some other stuffed animal or a bunch of stuffed animals on their beds.
You don't have to be under 18 to like pillow fights or stuffed animals. Where did you get that shit
I find that the insinuations, implications, and accusations on this thread to be what is sick in our industry, not to mention utterly ridiculous. Very interesting how the ONLY program mentioned or used as an example is lightspeed. Very interesting.
Because some here seem to have their heads up their collective asses about this, I will clarify the "content vs sex" issue for you.... beyond that, you're on your own.
Content --
18 and over.... legal. PERIOD. None of this "but she's holding a teddy bear" shit either. Props mean nothing, I've had 30 yr old girlfriends that have stuffed animals in their bedroom, get a fucking grip. What, college girls can't have a fucking pillow fight??
18+ is legal in most of the <i>civilized</i> world anyway. If you live in a country where it is illegal to show, produce, or look at nude models that are under 21, then you shouldn't even be looking at LS's content in the first place. You are breaking your own fucking laws.... idiot.
Sex ---
As I said, having sex privately is different from doing content. If you need me to tell you this, chances are you're a moron anyway. The age of consent is what stipulates when a young person can legally have sex with other people, and here in Canada that age is 14. In the USA it varies from state to state, but the standard is 15 or 16 in most areas I know of.
And Krome, it's "pedo", not peado. Pedos gravitate to kids, as in CHILDREN, not young ladies of legal adult age. An 18+ yr old chick holding a fucking stuffed animal or a pillow means fuck ALL to a pedophile I'm sure. Every case I've ever seen in the news has always involved young children, not late-teens, so I'm thinking that there is more to this thread than what is being said. Maybe we best stick to reporting real cp and mind our own networks for a change? Just a thought.
Legal content is 18 and over - As far as I am aware, there is no maximum age.
If it is legal to do so, then what is the problem?
Pedos are NOT interested in 18 year old girls or boys - Pedos' go after kids very much younger.
If an eighteen year old girl is old enough to make her mind up about who she wishes to vote for, then she is old enough to commit herself to a sexual relationship - And work as a shop assistant or model.
Steve Lightspeed has a great business model - Only the jelious will disagree
Originally posted by CDSmith I find that the insinuations, implications, and accusations on this thread to be what is sick in our industry, not to mention utterly ridiculous. Very interesting how the ONLY program mentioned or used as an example is lightspeed. Very interesting.
Because some here seem to have their heads up their collective asses about this, I will clarify the "content vs sex" issue for you.... beyond that, you're on your own.
Content --
18 and over.... legal. PERIOD. None of this "but she's holding a teddy bear" shit either. Props mean nothing, I've had 30 yr old girlfriends that have stuffed animals in their bedroom, get a fucking grip. What, college girls can't have a fucking pillow fight??
18+ is legal in most of the <i>civilized</i> world anyway. If you live in a country where it is illegal to show, produce, or look at nude models that are under 21, then you shouldn't even be looking at LS's content in the first place. You are breaking your own fucking laws.... idiot.
Sex ---
As I said, having sex privately is different from doing content. If you need me to tell you this, chances are you're a moron anyway. The age of consent is what stipulates when a young person can legally have sex with other people, and here in Canada that age is 14. In the USA it varies from state to state, but the standard is 15 or 16 in most areas I know of.
And Krome, it's "pedo", not peado. Pedos gravitate to kids, as in CHILDREN, not young ladies of legal adult age. An 18+ yr old chick holding a fucking stuffed animal or a pillow means fuck ALL to a pedophile I'm sure. Every case I've ever seen in the news has always involved young children, not late-teens, so I'm thinking that there is more to this thread than what is being said. Maybe we best stick to reporting real cp and mind our own networks for a change? Just a thought.
Originally posted by Krome
You are actually technically a peado if you fuck a 17 year old.
Huh no.
You are against the law. Not a pedo. Get a fucking clue.
We are animals.. and it's NORMAL that we get all excited on sexy 15-18 females. I hate hyprocrisy. All men like small tight butts... 16 years old or 21 years old.
Pedos are people looking into pre-teen stuff like 4 to 14 years old.
"There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. A high-powered mutant of some kind never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die." -Hunter S. Thompson
why is no one attacking some of those twink sites out there? i was looking for some good gay sites to mail. and jesus H christ if 90% of them dudes didnt look a fuck of a lot younger then the girls posted in this thread.
Comment