11-23-2003, 01:12 AM
|
|
|
Confirmed User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: God's Country (Georgia)
Posts: 3,706
|
Quote:
Originally posted by CDSmith
I find that the insinuations, implications, and accusations on this thread to be what is sick in our industry, not to mention utterly ridiculous. Very interesting how the ONLY program mentioned or used as an example is lightspeed. Very interesting.
Because some here seem to have their heads up their collective asses about this, I will clarify the "content vs sex" issue for you.... beyond that, you're on your own.
Content --
18 and over.... legal. PERIOD. None of this "but she's holding a teddy bear" shit either. Props mean nothing, I've had 30 yr old girlfriends that have stuffed animals in their bedroom, get a fucking grip. What, college girls can't have a fucking pillow fight??
18+ is legal in most of the <i>civilized</i> world anyway. If you live in a country where it is illegal to show, produce, or look at nude models that are under 21, then you shouldn't even be looking at LS's content in the first place. You are breaking your own fucking laws.... idiot.
Sex ---
As I said, having sex privately is different from doing content. If you need me to tell you this, chances are you're a moron anyway. The age of consent is what stipulates when a young person can legally have sex with other people, and here in Canada that age is 14. In the USA it varies from state to state, but the standard is 15 or 16 in most areas I know of.
And Krome, it's "pedo", not peado. Pedos gravitate to kids, as in CHILDREN, not young ladies of legal adult age. An 18+ yr old chick holding a fucking stuffed animal or a pillow means fuck ALL to a pedophile I'm sure. Every case I've ever seen in the news has always involved young children, not late-teens, so I'm thinking that there is more to this thread than what is being said. Maybe we best stick to reporting real cp and mind our own networks for a change? Just a thought.
|
Will you have my children? |
|
|