View Single Post
Old 11-22-2003, 10:02 PM  
theking
Nice Kitty
 
theking's Avatar
 
Industry Role:
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: The good old USA!!!
Posts: 21,053
Quote:
Originally posted by crockett


I duno about the stats in that flash, but depleted Uranium shells should be banned, I 100% agree with this.. The pentagon was warned years before the 1st Gulf War that these shells were a very serious heath hazard.. but the brass had a hard on for what they can do..

I'll agree they are a great advantage on the battlefield but the overall effect of these shells is of major health concern.. not only for our foes , but our own troops as well. The shit health problems that have happened over the last 10 years should be a major wake up call.. too bad the Pentagon buries this from the general public
The shells were designed for one purpose and that is to take out armored vehicles...and I suggest to you that an armored vehicle is hazardous to the health of a soldier...more so than the round that takes the armored vehicle out.
__________________
When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
theking is offline   Share thread on Digg Share thread on Twitter Share thread on Reddit Share thread on Facebook Reply With Quote