Bush getting ready to go after porn
Collapse
X
-
Tags: None
-
Ok, The bush Familly wanna take over the Porn Money and controle the bizness -
Among the activities that will be discouraged in a Bush era porno include: "no food used as a sex object, no peeing unless in a natural setting, such as a field or roadside and no coffins or blindfolds." And as Mark Cromer stresses in The Nation, "No black men, white women themes," although white men can still have sex with black women. Lastly, Cromer reports the ubiquitous money shot, in which the man shoots his sperm upon the face of his sex partner, may be endangered as well.
/(bb|[^b]{2})/Comment
-
"Among the activities that will be discouraged in a Bush era porno include: "no food used as a sex object, no peeing unless in a natural setting, such as a field or roadside and no coffins or blindfolds." And as Mark Cromer stresses in The Nation, "No black men, white women themes," although white men can still have sex with black women. Lastly, Cromer reports the ubiquitous money shot, in which the man shoots his sperm upon the face of his sex partner, may be endangered as well."
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Oh no, not the endangered money shot!
No black men and white women themes? What a joke!!
But until the war on terrorism is over I don't think that we have much to worry about
AIM sherierocks
ICQ 127-296-286
Skype traffichorComment
-
I dunno Wizzo...
If the DOJ has all that spare time on their hands to go bust pipe dealers, you think they might be blowing a few dollars on some T&A dealers?
sure they are....
my guess is that we'll see more and more anti-porn litigation beefing up in 03, esp now that MSN/AOL is going after those 'dirty porn spammers' etc....
I hope you're right though...Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.
Comment
-
Has anyone ever considered pushing an online porn-defense fund/coolition type of thing?
If they're gonna gang up on this industry, does this industry have a plan to group together and bang back?
Or will it be every man/woman for him/herself?
Just curious if any of the biggies or smallies out there have thought of pushing a concept like that...
"The Porn Union" or something of the sort...Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.
Comment
-
Originally posted by Interlude
Be thankful he's busy hunting terrorists, it keeps the industry safe
I hope you're right, but I got a gutt feeling otherwise...Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.
Comment
-
Has anyone ever considered pushing an online porn-defense fund/coolition type of thing?
Tried that last year grouped with a general association T-J... it ended up with a bunch of whiners not wanting to pay a small yearly fee to belong...
Whiners
Even WITH thehun being involved... Appears he has pulled out as well.<center><a target="_blank" href="http://dev.datedollars.com/index.php?s=signup&aid=535&cfg=aac"><img border="0" src="http://216.130.172.224/gfy/gsig.gif" width="490" height="100"></a><br><a href="http://dev.datedollars.com/index.php?s=signup&aid=535&cfg=aac" target="_blank"><b><font face="Arial"><font color="#FF99FF"> Buy me away from Slavedriver Smokey!<br>It's May Sig Sweeps!<font></b></center>Comment
-
Originally posted by Gemini
Has anyone ever considered pushing an online porn-defense fund/coolition type of thing?
Tried that last year grouped with a general association T-J... it ended up with a bunch of whiners not wanting to pay a small yearly fee to belong...
Whiners
Even WITH thehun being involved... Appears he has pulled out as well.
Figures as much, and really too bad.
The need is there for sure! Although most 'biggies' could survive a lengthy legal onslaught I'd say the majority of smaller webmasters would just end up being future cast members of Oz...
:/Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.
Comment
-
There's already a few groups like that in place - unless someone comes along and posts them, I'll search through all my old bookmarks and get the links for yaOriginally posted by TheJimmy
Has anyone ever considered pushing an online porn-defense fund/coolition type of thing?
If they're gonna gang up on this industry, does this industry have a plan to group together and bang back?Comment
-
In any kind of crackdown they're probably going to target the big video producers. It is much easier to prosecute someone for porn they are selling on a video tape. Everyone understands videotapes, so it is easier to explain to the jury. Prosecuting websites is more complex because there is no physical item you can villify. Also, if they go after internet porn, it will all just move offshore.
It would be terrible to see some of the bigger internet porn companies get taken out by Ashhahahahaha. What do you think would change if ARS, TopBucks, etc were gone tomorrow?FTVGirls simply convert better.
More free content than SobeGirl and
conversions almost as good as Swoit!Comment
-
-
It already exists http://www.freespeechcoalition.com/Originally posted by TheJimmy
Has anyone ever considered pushing an online porn-defense fund/coolition type of thing?
FTVGirls simply convert better.
More free content than SobeGirl and
conversions almost as good as Swoit!Comment
-
Originally posted by skazzel
In any kind of crackdown they're probably going to target the big video producers. It is much easier to prosecute someone for porn they are selling on a video tape. Everyone understands videotapes, so it is easier to explain to the jury. Prosecuting websites is more complex because there is no physical item you can villify. Also, if they go after internet porn, it will all just move offshore.
It would be terrible to see some of the bigger internet porn companies get taken out by Ashhahahahaha. What do you think would change if ARS, TopBucks, etc were gone tomorrow?
I don't think they will stick 'strictly' to the 'hard targets'
they most likely will do a mix to get the broadest coverage and message across....going after big and little alike...
that's just a hunch, as it makes the most sense...
if you wanted to push a message/issue would you ONLY stick to the hard targets?Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.
Comment
-
-
yes, there is the one mentioned above, but there's also http://www.i-freedom.org/ and http://www.eff.org/Comment
-
Great so blacks can´t fuck white chicks anymore and tape it....white men can fuck black chicks and tape it. What´s next No Blacks allowed signs on the streets? USA Leaders of the Free
world
DynaMite
Comment
-
-
Maybe, maybe not. They might try the big online sites first, or even the little ones. While my case was over 2 years ago and not associated with any new crackdown, it happened nonetheless. I ran DyannaDoes.com, and if you want to read a little about it, there's an article on The Adult Webmaster that was written by my attorney. Go here http://www.theadultwebmaster.com/art...erman_01.phtmlOriginally posted by skazzel
In any kind of crackdown they're probably going to target the big video producers. It is much easier to prosecute someone for porn they are selling on a video tape. Everyone understands videotapes, so it is easier to explain to the jury. Prosecuting websites is more complex because there is no physical item you can villify.
And you might also visit http://www.theadultwebmaster.com/leg...er/index.phtml as it has a lot of links to useful sites plus articles on specific topics.Comment
-
ordinary porn will continue in the United States, even so-called hardcore.
this is because in the USA we have something called due process. now 18 year olds and college students are in jury pools. Playboy TV now shows hardcore. we have presidents who like to get sucked off. the genie will not be put back into the bottle. so-called hardcore appeared in europe in the mid 60's. guess what---it is still there, except for open child porn. anywhere in stockholm today you can buy a video of a woman fellating a pony.
and no one gives a shit.
gay rights advocates have been pushing the political correctness of "gayness"--- "will and grace" is a ratings hit. rump wrangler hardcore will continue unabated due to that political correctness.
ubiquitous porn unsolicited email bombards everyone who has an internet connection---yes, people are annoyed with it---but they have now seen it---and they did not die, and the sky did not fall.
consensual themed "porno" will survive---no matter how "hard".
now, because ordinary porn is so available and common there are producers that have begun to push the envelope.
and, i believe, non-consensual appearing porn IS vulnerable to prosecution and conviction (i.e. "max hardcore" type stuff). it is true that his stuff might get an acquital in california---it probably would not get an acquital by community standards in other states.
my 3 cents.Comment
-
First off it would just have to be for adult webmasters. If you look at the free speech coalitions site. Its bookstore owners and strip bars for the most part who get busted and I wouldnt want my membership dollars being spent on them.
Why a Adult webmaster union wouldn't work :
Too many egos
A big rule would have to be no explicit porn on your free pages. (I had a meeting with people that wanted to do a adult website and I told the guy we dont do sites with explicit porn on the free pages .We believe in protecting kids, he looked at me like I was fucking insane. Then he went on to tell me how everyone is doing and noone gets in trouble. Thats the attitude for the most part.)Many would never do that because they prefer the easy way.
Another big rule would have to be that we would have to do all our business practices with integrity which means no saying I have 500,000 pics in my site when they really have 500. No fuck the customer. I think most would frown on that also.
We would need adult (who is squeaky clean)to represent us some who looks good on TV and a PR firm to get us on the news programs when porn and the internet comes up. (A example either zdnet or cnet had a story on the video patent thing, it said they asked Holio lawyer for a comment and got none. Now maybe if he opened his mouth and said how today its us tomorrow its you. It would of created support for us) We need a voice we are way too quiet so they can say whatever the fuck they want about us.
Adult webmasters are cheap by nature, most started their business for free.Ever think why no adult lawyers hang on this board, its because they see no money to be made here. I think to pay $500 a year to be a member isn't much if it helped protect me but most webmasters if its not free its not for them.
Also a large amount of adult webmasters live under the illusion they we will never come after me so they don't see the need for forming a strong group with a strong voice.
This is a shame alot of us make a good living and they can start cherry picking us off. All that will be left is the flat ,uninspired corporate stuff.Comment
-
porn will be here as long as the sun shines... porn is not like a switch that you can just shut it off !!
sex rules - YEAH
Comment
-
Just like they went after these guys for selling bongs
http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/reuters20030224_588.html
Im wondering when they will hand down the indictments for obscenity.Comment
-
You can protect yourself, no explicit porn on free pages. If they want to see it they have to pay. For paid porn I doubt they will really go after the mainstream adult sites. When I can walk into borders and buy a penthouse, with pics of one girl sticking a whip handle up anothers pussy. But the people that do extreme shit will be a target but if you want to dance you have pay the band.Comment
-
Tony404
hit me up on ICQ if you got a few, would like to speak with you more about the topic if you're up to it...
5702550
thx...Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.
Comment
-
models - I pretty much agree with all of that. Ordinary hardcore porn will not go away. However, it can still be targeted.
But, this applies to ordinary porn too. Since there is no precedent for establishing where the prosecution will come from, you're not 100% safe no matter what you are doing.and, i believe, non-consensual appearing porn IS vulnerable to prosecution and conviction (i.e. "max hardcore" type stuff). it is true that his stuff might get an acquital in california---it probably would not get an acquital by community standards in other states.
Until the government determines whether online porn falls in the jurisdiction of it's creation, where the server is, where the company is, or where it is DOWNLOADED . . . you just don't know.
If you read the link I provided above about my case, I was prosecuted where the material was DOWNLOADED.Comment
-
100% correct. The Internet Freedom Association - http://www.i-freedom.org/ - comes closest to that. However, I have no idea how much they are really doing.Originally posted by tony404
First off it would just have to be for adult webmasters.
As to the rest of your post, I couldn't agree more with all of it.Comment
-
True, but it's still possible - my site was a paid member area and all the content they ruled "obscene" was inside the member area. And all of my content was "regular" porn.Originally posted by tony404
You can protect yourself, no explicit porn on free pages. If they want to see it they have to pay. For paid porn I doubt they will really go after the mainstream adult sites. When I can walk into borders and buy a penthouse, with pics of one girl sticking a whip handle up anothers pussy. But the people that do extreme shit will be a target but if you want to dance you have pay the band.
blazi & tony - yes, porn will never go away - it's a huge industry with huge consumer demands.
The message that adult webmasters need to get across to the right wing christian groups and conservative governement is this:
Even if they are able to shut down all the porn for profit sites in the US, the problem will get WORSE, not better. As it stands, a large majority of traffic is controlled by the big companies trying to follow the law. But if they shut us all down in the US, they'll end up with much more free hardcore porn available, and the content will be even worse as it wil be coming from Europe and Russia, etc.Comment
-
Excuse me.. I'd just like to say WTF IS WRONG WITH PORN?
I'm sure bush is a pr0n addict himself,
He makes money off the tax with it. He'd do himself a favour if he delt with the war and not with porn..Comment
-
Are you claiming that Europe has worse quality porn than the US?Originally posted by horns
True, but it's still possible - my site was a paid member area and all the content they ruled "obscene" was inside the member area. And all of my content was "regular" porn.
blazi & tony - yes, porn will never go away - it's a huge industry with huge consumer demands.
The message that adult webmasters need to get across to the right wing christian groups and conservative governement is this:
Even if they are able to shut down all the porn for profit sites in the US, the problem will get WORSE, not better. As it stands, a large majority of traffic is controlled by the big companies trying to follow the law. But if they shut us all down in the US, they'll end up with much more free hardcore porn available, and the content will be even worse as it wil be coming from Europe and Russia, etc.
Are you insinuating that the Euro porn/biz is the same as Russian?
If you do.......you´re out of your fucking mind.
DynaMite
Comment
-
Its ok to expose our children to an horrific and terrifying image of christ nailed to a cross bleeding to death, but images of people giving one another mutal pleasure are wrong? Give me a fucking break! We are sexual beings and sex is healthy as long is is among consenting adults. Dep-ictions of sex are also healthy, it is de-pictions of violence that pervade the religious right to scare its followers into obeying its hypocrital brainwashing that should that should be sensored. (GFY: Why is E-P-I-C Blocked on this board????)Last edited by LongShlong8; 02-25-2003, 10:29 AM.Comment
-
Its ok to expose our children to an horrific and terrifying image of christ nailed to a cross bleeding to death, but images of people giving one another mutal pleasure are wrong? Give me a fucking break! We are sexual beings and sex is healthy as long is is among consenting adults. Dhahahahations of sex are also healthy, it is dhahahahations of violence that pervade the religious right to scare its followers into obeying its hypocrital brainwashing that should that should be sensored.Comment
-
Well, in one way yes and in one way no. I didn't mean, ALL of Europe, just parts of it.Originally posted by DynaSpain
Are you claiming that Europe has worse quality porn than the US?
Are you insinuating that the Euro porn/biz is the same as Russian?
If you do.......you´re out of your fucking mind.
DynaMite
But my main point is that since the porn will be coming from OUTSIDE the US, there will be nothing the government can do to regulate or stop it.
As for quality, yes some of Europe does some GREAT stuff.Comment
-
I agree on this....I just get irritated by seeing so many timesOriginally posted by horns
Well, in one way yes and in one way no. I didn't mean, ALL of Europe, just parts of it.
But my main point is that since the porn will be coming from OUTSIDE the US, there will be nothing the government can do to regulate or stop it.
As for quality, yes some of Europe does some GREAT stuff.
the way many americans think about Europe when:
1: They can´t find it on a map
2: Have no clue what´s Europe like
3: Never have visited
4: Do not realise how many Big Famous companies are run by
Europeans or actually are European.
and the last is not only content. Countries you refer to are not
Europe as in the European Union. They are simply called East
Europe because they are attached to us.....like South America
and Canada are attached to the US.
The same with Holland everytime it´s mentioned as it´s the
freehaven of everything. Yes Holland is liberal yes animal stuff
is legal.....NO Holland is not trying to push the animal stuff....the
same with the old teens laws which said 17 year old girls are legal.
I can assure that if you put it up now.....you WILL get big problems. It´s for a reason why Clubseventeen is now
pushing 18 years old content only.
European countries are not hunting down porn because it´s porn
They will only adapt laws if things get out of control. We call that
Freedom of Speech/Information/Publicity. Cristians who don´t like
it? Don´t watch it!
DynaMite
Comment
-
Originally posted by LongShlong8
Its ok to expose our children to an horrific and terrifying image of christ nailed to a cross bleeding to death, but images of people giving one another mutal pleasure are wrong? Give me a fucking break! We are sexual beings and sex is healthy as long is is among consenting adults. Dhahahahations of sex are also healthy, it is dhahahahations of violence that pervade the religious right to scare its followers into obeying its hypocrital brainwashing that should that should be sensored.
AMEN to that man!
I'd much rather have my kid see a few people fuckin than a few people dying, getting killed or getting mutilated on the News or in a movie
but they will never attack the mass media as it is the ONLY thing more powerful than the government itself...as senators and politicians are made or broke on the public opinion which can be skewed by mass media....Investor with 5m - 15m USD to invest. Do you have a site or network of sites earning 50k - 200k a month income? Email your contact and preliminary data to: domain.cashventures (at) gmail.com....Please...no tire kickers...serious offers and inquiries only.
Comment
-
They wont even think about going after the big dogs of porn like ARS etc. those guys can afford to hire Johnny Cochran and the like. The government couldn't afford to lose a case like that. So they will go after the small and medium size guys who cannot afford a long legal battle. And after they have convicted tons of little guys they will say to the big guys clean up your act. The big guys will fold like cheap suits and Bush will be reelected. I have one thing to say to those who would take our freedoms away.
SIG TOO BIG! Maximum 120x60 button and no more than 3 text lines of DEFAULT SIZE and COLOR. Unless your sig is for a GFY top banner sponsor, then you may use a 624x80 instead of a 120x60.Comment
-
Ive been saying this a long time, but from a logical standpoint how long do you really expect to be able to offer hardcore content on free pages.
A few years back when it looked like some law was going to be passed, most paysites started going the way of no hardcore on tour, censor spots, etc.
Now, pretty much every big time program has penetration, fluids, etc on their free tour. Kind of amazing they take that risk actually.
Basically what I'm saying is its inevitable that eventually free hardcore won't be allowed. That day may happen in two years, or it may happen in five years. But its coming.Ever notice that pretty much everything added to the Constitution after the original was a mistake.Comment
-
Given that there is no hard and fast definition - or perhaps I should say interpretation - of what constitutes 'obscene' , I wonder how the government would define 'porn site' ?
For example, is a TGP or links list a porn site? They don't have actual porn on them, just links as we all know.
If they are, then presumably so is Google - search for 'porn' and you'll get almost 52,000,000 results.
Somehow, I can't see Google being prosecuted.Comment
-
As a sitting board member, I can tell you what the IFA is doing:
We're in the process of nominating/electing a permanent board. You can find more information at the web site at http://www.i-freedom.org .
You're right, the industry does need an online-only organization, and that's exactly the purpose of the IFA. So send in your nominations now so the process can continue.Comment
-
Sounds interesting,Originally posted by Danny_C
As a sitting board member, I can tell you what the IFA is doing:
We're in the process of nominating/electing a permanent board. You can find more information at the web site at http://www.i-freedom.org .
You're right, the industry does need an online-only organization, and that's exactly the purpose of the IFA. So send in your nominations now so the process can continue.
I don't really think porn will ever go away as long as you stick to the legal stuff.
There are to many people that want it.
OzComment
-
Interesting...unless they start EUTHANIZING and/or STERILIZING fans of porn, its gonna be quite the uphill battle....Originally posted by models
ordinary porn will continue in the United States, even so-called hardcore.
this is because in the USA we have something called due process. now 18 year olds and college students are in jury pools. Playboy TV now shows hardcore. we have presidents who like to get sucked off. the genie will not be put back into the bottle. so-called hardcore appeared in europe in the mid 60's. guess what---it is still there, except for open child porn. anywhere in stockholm today you can buy a video of a woman fellating a pony.<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" border="1" bgcolor="#008000"><tr><td><font size=3>Gone</font></td></tr></table>Comment
-
How come it seems ifreedom has taken a very low profile on these boards? Also how come the site have very little on it except where to send money ? How come the application or the site doesnt have a list of standards a adult webmaster must follow to be member of your group, just where to send the check?
To make a group worth something they must have standards set forth and followed by the members. It shows the world we are serious.Comment
-
Sorry Danny_COriginally posted by Danny_C
As a sitting board member, I can tell you what the IFA is doing:
We're in the process of nominating/electing a permanent board. You can find more information at the web site at http://www.i-freedom.org .
You're right, the industry does need an online-only organization, and that's exactly the purpose of the IFA. So send in your nominations now so the process can continue.
Be better if your organization took a less country-specific approach in your marketing materials. There are other countries in the world who are interested in Freedom of Expression.<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" border="1" bgcolor="#008000"><tr><td><font size=3>Gone</font></td></tr></table>Comment





Comment