Rapist on payroll - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

kenny

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 7245
Share

Post
#1

Rapist on payroll

01-20-2003, 08:17 PM

I watched this documentary of Sadam Hussein on TV recently about his rule over Iraq. He has rapist on payroll to rape peoples family members during interrogative procedure. He has also been known to have peoples children get tortured in front of them as a form of interrogation. Speaking agaisnt Sadam Hussein is punishable in written law by cutting out your tongue. He uses several torture methonds including acid baths, electric shock, etc.
The program also described how thick his security is. Estimated 20 doubles that appear in public for him. They said the real Sadam Hussein hasnt been video taped in public in 4 - 5 years.
Makes me appreciate the fact that I live in a country that gives me the right to speak and live with freedom. When the United States goes to war and removes the Sadam goverment it will benifit the US and the people of Iraq.

7
Tags: None
Sly_RJ

Live Hard - Die Hard

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 17042
Share

Post
#2

01-20-2003, 08:19 PM

Yep, this has been known for quite some time.

PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price!
sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144
Comment
stanton

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jun 2002

Posts: 2640
Share

Post
#3

01-20-2003, 08:20 PM

blah blah blah

Sadam Hussein is Bad

Amerika is good

FLAG WAVING HICK!
Comment
asuna

Confirmed User

Join Date: May 2002

Posts: 8743
Share

Post
#4

01-20-2003, 08:21 PM

you know his name backwards is Mad ass
Comment
mpegposter

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2002

Posts: 483
Share

Post
#5

01-20-2003, 08:21 PM

I wonder what kind of job criteria he has for his Royal rapist. Can you imagine the interview process?

The voice of the Moral Minority.

New Sponsor Converting Like Hell!
Comment
kenny

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 7245
Share

Post
#6

01-20-2003, 08:22 PM

Originally posted by Sly_RJ
Yep, this has been known for quite some time.

Yes, but I have never heard it before with such detailed information.

7
Comment
Sly_RJ

Live Hard - Die Hard

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 17042
Share

Post
#7

01-20-2003, 08:25 PM

Originally posted by kenny

Yes, but I have never heard it before with such detailed information.

Yeh, I wish you could have had this to post several months ago when people kept saying how much his people loved him.

Ooo, he won the election 100%! His people love him!

Haha. It's still funny...

PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price!
sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144
Comment
multisexsite

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 929
Share

Post
#8

01-20-2003, 08:29 PM

George Bush has doubles too....
Comment
mpegposter

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2002

Posts: 483
Share

Post
#9

01-20-2003, 08:30 PM

Yeah that election was great. State-run voting booths with a YES or NO option for Hussein.

We should have pulled a Vietnam on them and decided to declare it void after it happened!

The voice of the Moral Minority.

New Sponsor Converting Like Hell!
Comment
stanton

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jun 2002

Posts: 2640
Share

Post
#10

01-20-2003, 08:31 PM

ahhhh

WHY US GOVERNMENT IS SO UPSEST WITH SADAM AND SOME EMPTY SHELLS FROM SOME TORPEDOS, WHEN THERE IS A FUCKING NORTH KOREA WITH NUKES?

answer: Iraq has Oil, N. Korea Got Rice

Last edited by stanton; 01-20-2003, 08:33 PM.
Comment
stanton

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jun 2002

Posts: 2640
Share

Post
#11

01-20-2003, 08:32 PM

Sorry for caps
Comment
stanton

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jun 2002

Posts: 2640
Share

Post
#12

01-20-2003, 08:36 PM
Comment
kenny

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 7245
Share

Post
#13

01-20-2003, 08:39 PM

Originally posted by Sly_RJ

Yeh, I wish you could have had this to post several months ago when people kept saying how much his people loved him.

Ooo, he won the election 100%! His people love him!

Haha. It's still funny...

His people mainly live in absolute fear of Sadam and ignorance towards a better way of life. He has been dictator of Iraq for almost 30 years, many of those people dont know of a different way of life.
If the united states removes Sadam the money from that country will put the US economy back on the fast track. I cant understand why millions of US citizens would oppose this war. They want to drive big cars and live in wealth from a country that was built on war, kind of like I want to get paid without working.

7
Comment
playa

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2001

Posts: 6432
Share

Post
#14

01-20-2003, 08:40 PM

Originally posted by stanton
N. Korea Got Rice

they don't even have rice
Comment
Sly_RJ

Live Hard - Die Hard

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 17042
Share

Post
#15

01-20-2003, 08:41 PM

Originally posted by kenny

His people mainly live in absolute fear of Sadam and ignorance towards a better way of life. He has been dictator of Iraq for almost 30 years, many of those people dont know of a different way of life.
If the united states removes Sadam the money from that country will put the US economy back on the fast track. I cant understand why millions of US citizens would oppose this war. They want to drive big cars and live in wealth from a country that was built on war, kind of like I want to get paid without working.

You're absolutely right.

Somewhat like the tree-huggers living in large houses, using paper, and having nice oak desks.

PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price!
sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144
Comment
stanton

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jun 2002

Posts: 2640
Share

Post
#16

01-20-2003, 08:41 PM

Originally posted by kenny

His people mainly live in absolute fear of Sadam and ignorance towards a better way of life. He has been dictator of Iraq for almost 30 years, many of those people dont know of a different way of life.
If the united states removes Sadam the money from that country will put the US economy back on the fast track. I cant understand why millions of US citizens would oppose this war. They want to drive big cars and live in wealth from a country that was built on war, kind of like I want to get paid without working.

you maza faka!!!

what gives you the right talking about other countries money and puting it in the US economy?!?!? Maybe if they remove Sadam, they should put money in the Iraqs economy?

You are a Nazi, aint better then Sadam !
Comment
mpegposter

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2002

Posts: 483
Share

Post
#17

01-20-2003, 08:42 PM

Originally posted by playa

they don't even have rice

The Ils laughed off the last famine. What was it, 150,000 people dead?

I believe it's Kim Jong who has something like 10,000 VHS videos in a huge movie library. He should watch Ghandi some more.

The voice of the Moral Minority.

New Sponsor Converting Like Hell!
Comment
kenny

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 7245
Share

Post
#18

01-20-2003, 08:44 PM

Originally posted by stanton
ahhhh

WHY US GOVERNMENT IS SO UPSEST WITH SADAM AND SOME EMPTY SHELLS FROM SOME TORPEDOS, WHEN THERE IS A FUCKING NORTH KOREA WITH NUKES?

answer: Iraq has Oil, N. Korea Got Rice

N.Korea can be dealt with in a diplomatic fashion, while Iraq was proven time after time not to work on a diplomatic level

7
Comment
kenny

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 7245
Share

Post
#19

01-20-2003, 08:48 PM

Originally posted by stanton

you maza faka!!!

what gives you the right talking about other countries money and puting it in the US economy?!?!? Maybe if they remove Sadam, they should put money in the Iraqs economy?

You are a Nazi, aint better then Sadam !

It will not only help the US economy but over time Iraq, and for that matter many other nations around the globe.

7
Comment
Sly_RJ

Live Hard - Die Hard

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 17042
Share

Post
#20

01-20-2003, 08:48 PM

I just find it amusing how people rave on about Bush being so terrible and some wild dictator, and then turn around and act like Saddam is a model world citizen.

PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price!
sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144
Comment
mpegposter

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2002

Posts: 483
Share

Post
#21

01-20-2003, 08:51 PM

The whole problem is there shouldn't be a difference. If we find nukes in Iraq (or strong evidence of a nuclear program) we invade. We find it in North Korea who DOES need the money (no oil) and has a reputation for extreme unpredictability (we were involved in a REAL war with them for years) and may very well sell the nukes to the highest bidder, and we want to pursue diplomacy?

N. Korea was part of the 'Axis of Evil' but we're offering them FOOD and ECONOMIC AID to disarm, to Iraq we're offering invasion forces with no proof or admission of guilt.

The voice of the Moral Minority.

New Sponsor Converting Like Hell!
Comment
kenny

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 7245
Share

Post
#22

01-20-2003, 08:58 PM

Originally posted by Sly_RJ
I just find it amusing how people rave on about Bush being so terrible and some wild dictator

The microwave popcorn society factor, people see the economy in its current state from the threat of war, without realizing the long term benifits. After the war is over and Bush loses the election some democrate will likely benifit and credit from the economic boom.

7
Comment
Sly_RJ

Live Hard - Die Hard

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 17042
Share

Post
#23

01-20-2003, 09:01 PM

Originally posted by kenny

The microwave popcorn society factor, people see the economy in its current state from the threat of war, without realizing the long term benifits. After the war is over and Bush loses the election some democrate will likely benifit and credit from the economic boom.

Again...

PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price!
sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144
Comment
TurboTrucker

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 2363
Share

Post
#24

01-20-2003, 09:12 PM

I'm not totally against the war, but I would like to see some more evidence in support of it. Saddam being a bad man just isn't enough, if we went to war with every country that had a bad person running it, we'd be at war with a lot of countries.
Comment
kenny

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 7245
Share

Post
#25

01-20-2003, 09:14 PM

Originally posted by mpegposter
The whole problem is there shouldn't be a difference. If we find nukes in Iraq (or strong evidence of a nuclear program) we invade. We find it in North Korea who DOES need the money (no oil) and has a reputation for extreme unpredictability (we were involved in a REAL war with them for years) and may very well sell the nukes to the highest bidder, and we want to pursue diplomacy?

N. Korea was part of the 'Axis of Evil' but we're offering them FOOD and ECONOMIC AID to disarm, to Iraq we're offering invasion forces with no proof or admission of guilt.

There is many reasons why it is different,

War with Iraq is a investment rather then a long term costly burden as war with N. Korea would be. Iraq has proven not to work on a dipolmatic level, while N.Korea can actually be dealt with in that manner.
The UN weapon violations is just one reason for removing Sadam, Sadam is also considered a war criminal and has violated human rights in such ways as Hitler.

7
Comment
TurboTrucker

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 2363
Share

Post
#26

01-20-2003, 09:18 PM

Hasn't N Korea broken every treaty we've had with them? I think that they're just not that much of a threat, like a small dog with a big bark.
Comment
mpegposter

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2002

Posts: 483
Share

Post
#27

01-20-2003, 09:49 PM

Originally posted by kenny

There is many reasons why it is different,

War with Iraq is a investment rather then a long term costly burden as war with N. Korea would be. Iraq has proven not to work on a dipolmatic level, while N.Korea can actually be dealt with in that manner.
The UN weapon violations is just one reason for removing Sadam, Sadam is also considered a war criminal and has violated human rights in such ways as Hitler.

N. Korea has its fair share of human rights violations. You're right that no two snowflakes are the same but to think it's 'okay' to essentially cave in to one dangerous country in favor of invading another...?

Makes us look like bigger asses than we already do. If that's possible.

The voice of the Moral Minority.

New Sponsor Converting Like Hell!
Comment
Rochard

Jägermeister Test Pilot

Join Date: Dec 2001

Posts: 75768
Share

Post
#28

01-20-2003, 09:54 PM

Originally posted by stanton
ahhhh

WHY US GOVERNMENT IS SO UPSEST WITH SADAM AND SOME EMPTY SHELLS FROM SOME TORPEDOS, WHEN THERE IS A FUCKING NORTH KOREA WITH NUKES?

answer: Iraq has Oil, N. Korea Got Rice

The difference is we've been dealing with the Koreas since the 1950's. North Korea is a problem with a violation of a treaty; Iraq is killing it's own people. Huge difference.

Herschel Savage
Brooklyn, NY
Comment
Sly_RJ

Live Hard - Die Hard

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 17042
Share

Post
#29

01-20-2003, 09:54 PM

Originally posted by mpegposter

N. Korea has its fair share of human rights violations. You're right that no two snowflakes are the same but to think it's 'okay' to essentially cave in to one dangerous country in favor of invading another...?

Makes us look like bigger asses than we already do. If that's possible.

Don't get me wrong, I see where you're coming from...

But, people are already bitching about how all focus has dropped from OBL and is now on Iraq. What do you think would happen if the Administration suddenly decided to drop Iraq and hit North Korea? The same damn thing, but worse.

Can't really fight both... the ball is rolling with one. Why start pissing with another using threats right now? Could lead to a major disaster.

PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price!
sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144
Comment
Gutterboy

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 4751
Share

Post
#30

01-20-2003, 09:59 PM

Originally posted by Sly_RJ
Can't really fight both... the ball is rolling with one. Why start pissing with another using threats right now? Could lead to a major disaster.

The whole idea of foreign policy is to have a consistent strategy for dealing with threats. Right now the US has no foreign policy. The flap with N Korea shows that Bush's pre-emption doctrine is nothing more than a once off justification for following though on his personal grudge with Saddam.

North Korea is more of a threat and its dictator Kim has racked up a body count through starvation that Saddam could dream about. Despite what those who try to rationalize the inconsistency might say, there is no evidence that a diplomatic solution will work with N. Korea, but there is evidence that it works with Saddam, who has been relatively quiet and contained for nearly a decade.

Last edited by Gutterboy; 01-20-2003, 10:00 PM.
Comment
mpegposter

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2002

Posts: 483
Share

Post
#31

01-20-2003, 10:00 PM

No argument there. Just saying actively coddling one regime just makes it even WORSE. Contrary to current doctrine you don't have to invade someone just because they pose a threat. We sure didn't ever take direct military action against Russia, that's why they call it 'cold.'

We have economic sanctions on Iraq already, but we're offering AID to North Korea if they make concessions we never gave Saddam the chance to make (well arguably we did give him resolutions, but the UN certainly didn't enforce them). Let the UN do their thing, he doesn't really need their aid as much as he says due to his oil reserves, but the whole thing smacks of hypocrisy.

Noone gives a fuck about starving and suffering populace elsewhere in the world. We OBVIOUSLY don't give a fuck about other dangerous rogue countries having nukes or our reaction to North Korea would have been more serious than a rap on the knuckles.

I just hate the bullshit we're being fed by the government right now. For once I'd like to see an honest statement by ANYone in power, on either side of the aisle.

The voice of the Moral Minority.

New Sponsor Converting Like Hell!
Comment
Sly_RJ

Live Hard - Die Hard

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 17042
Share

Post
#32

01-20-2003, 10:01 PM

Originally posted by Gutterboy

The whole idea of foreign policy is to have a consistent strategy for dealing with threats. Right now the US has no foreign policy. The flap with N Korea shows that Bush's pre-emption doctrine is nothing more than a once off justification for following though on his personal grudge with Saddam.

North Korea is more of a threat and its leader has killed many more of its people through starvation that Saddam could dream about. Despite what those who try to rationalize the inconsistency might say, there is no evidence that a diplomatic solution will work with N. Korea, but there is evidence that it works with Saddam, who has been relatively quiet and contained for nearly a decade.

That's fine.

But you completely avoided my question.

How can you have consistent foreign policy by dumping yet another mission for a "bigger dog"?

PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price!
sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144
Comment
mpegposter

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2002

Posts: 483
Share

Post
#33

01-20-2003, 10:03 PM

Originally posted by Gutterboy

The whole idea of foreign policy is to have a consistent strategy for dealing with threats. Right now the US has no foreign policy. The flap with N Korea shows that Bush's pre-emption doctrine is nothing more than a once off justification for following though on his personal grudge with Saddam.

North Korea is more of a threat and its dictator Kim has racked up a body count through starvation that Saddam could dream about. Despite what those who try to rationalize the inconsistency might say, there is no evidence that a diplomatic solution will work with N. Korea, but there is evidence that it works with Saddam, who has been relatively quiet and contained for nearly a decade.

Exactly. Better phrasing than I could pull off at 2 am. All the more ironic that N. Korea was one of the 'Axis of Evil' specifically singled out as a major threat to our soverignty.

The voice of the Moral Minority.

New Sponsor Converting Like Hell!
Comment
kmanrox

aka K-Man

Join Date: Oct 2001

Posts: 29295
Share

Post
#34

01-20-2003, 10:05 PM

i dont condone rape (i do condone torture though).... but think about it... he has absolute power... he makes the laws in his country he rules, he answers to nobody..... he wants info from someone.... why not employ every option available to get what you need to retain your power?

you dont think bush wouldnt do the same thing to the al quaeda terrorists we arrest in our country if he had nobody to answer to?

food for though....

im just playing devil's advocate, dont get all teary eyed on me...

Crypto HODLr
Crypto mining
Angel investor
Comment
Sly_RJ

Live Hard - Die Hard

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 17042
Share

Post
#35

01-20-2003, 10:05 PM

Originally posted by mpegposter
Noone gives a fuck about starving and suffering populace elsewhere in the world. We OBVIOUSLY don't give a fuck about other dangerous rogue countries having nukes or our reaction to North Korea would have been more serious than a rap on the knuckles.

Of course not, there's more economic interest in Iraq.

I just hate the bullshit we're being fed by the government right now. For once I'd like to see an honest statement by ANYone in power, on either side of the aisle.

That won't happen. The propaganda is needed to propel the government and it's agenda. It goes both ways. That's how politics works.

Besides, Americans don't want honest answers. They want candy-coated stories to make them feel good at night. Why do you think all box office hits have happy endings?

PHAT SERVERS - Quality dedicated hosting at a quality price!
sly AT phatservers DOT com - 147479144
Comment
Gutterboy

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 4751
Share

Post
#36

01-20-2003, 10:09 PM

Originally posted by Sly_RJ

How can you have consistent foreign policy by dumping yet another mission for a "bigger dog"?

The current policy, supposedly, is one of preemptive strikes on countres which threaten the US. Saddam is not a threat to the US. His military is pathetic, he has no nuclear weapons, and its doubtful that he has enough chemical or biological weapons to do any real damage. N. Korea on the other hand has a real military, and nuclear weapons, and chem/bio weapons, and a crackpot dictator.

So if we're going to run around doing preemptive strikes, we should be invading N Korea, not Iraq. There is no reason to invade Iraq beyond the fact that Saddam is an obvious prick, and again, to be consistent, if we're going to invade Saddam for being a prick to his own people, there are lots of other countries we're going to have to do the same thing to. But we won't because Iraq is about Bush's personal grudge, not any rational need to invade to protect our interests.

That is the whole point of the anti-war movement. No one thinks Saddam is a nice guy or a model citizen, its the fact that Bush is obviously playing out his personal grudges rather than looking out for the interests & security of the nation that worries people. It worries alot of other countries too.

Last edited by Gutterboy; 01-20-2003, 10:13 PM.
Comment
theking

Nice Kitty

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 21053
Share

Post
#37

01-20-2003, 10:11 PM

Originally posted by stanton
blah blah blah

Sadam Hussein is Bad

Amerika is good

FLAG WAVING HICK!

Two correct out of three.

When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
Comment
mpegposter

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2002

Posts: 483
Share

Post
#38

01-20-2003, 10:12 PM

NY TIMES -

As American combat forces continued to flow into the Persian Gulf region and the United Nations debated Iraq, Mr. Rumsfeld said "it will not take months" to decide whether President Saddam Hussein is cooperating with weapons inspectors.

"In the case of Iraq, we're nearing the end of the long road, and with every other option exhausted," he said.

In making his case that the United States and "a coalition of the willing" must prepare for military action to disarm Iraq, should President Bush order the nation to war, he said the Hussein government had been stonewalling weapons inspectors.

His regime has large, unaccounted-for stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons including VX, Sarin, mustard gas, anthrax, botulism and possibly smallpox," Mr. Rumsfeld said in an address to the Reserve Officers Association here. "And he has an active program to acquire and develop nuclear weapons."

He dismissed those who were demanding incontrovertible proof of Iraq's arsenal of terror weapons.

While Iraq and North Korea "are both repressive dictatorships," Iraq "is unique," he said.

"No other living dictator has shown the same deadly combination of capability and intent, of aggression against its neighbors, pursuit of weapons of mass destruction, the use of chemical weapons against his own people as well as against his neighbors, oppression of his own people, support of terrorism, and the most threatening hostility to its neighbors, and to the United States, as has Iraq," he said.

---

With these kind of 'arguments' he'd fit right in on GFY.

The voice of the Moral Minority.

New Sponsor Converting Like Hell!
Comment
theking

Nice Kitty

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 21053
Share

Post
#39

01-20-2003, 10:12 PM

Originally posted by stanton
ahhhh

WHY US GOVERNMENT IS SO UPSEST WITH SADAM AND SOME EMPTY SHELLS FROM SOME TORPEDOS, WHEN THERE IS A FUCKING NORTH KOREA WITH NUKES?

answer: Iraq has Oil, N. Korea Got Rice

Wrong assumption.

When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
Comment
theking

Nice Kitty

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 21053
Share

Post
#40

01-20-2003, 10:15 PM

Originally posted by stanton

you maza faka!!!

what gives you the right talking about other countries money and puting it in the US economy?!?!? Maybe if they remove Sadam, they should put money in the Iraqs economy?

You are a Nazi, aint better then Sadam !

We will put money into Iraq's economy. We did it with Japan and Germany.

When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
Comment
kenny

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 7245
Share

Post
#41

01-20-2003, 10:19 PM

Originally posted by mpegposter
NY TIMES -

As American combat forces continued to flow into the Persian Gulf region and the United Nations debated Iraq, Mr. Rumsfeld said "it will not take months" to decide whether President Saddam Hussein is cooperating with weapons inspectors.

"In the case of Iraq, we're nearing the end of the long road, and with every other option exhausted," he said.

In making his case that the United States and "a coalition of the willing" must prepare for military action to disarm Iraq, should President Bush order the nation to war, he said the Hussein government had been stonewalling weapons inspectors.

His regime has large, unaccounted-for stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons including VX, Sarin, mustard gas, anthrax, botulism and possibly smallpox," Mr. Rumsfeld said in an address to the Reserve Officers Association here. "And he has an active program to acquire and develop nuclear weapons."

He dismissed those who were demanding incontrovertible proof of Iraq's arsenal of terror weapons.

While Iraq and North Korea "are both repressive dictatorships," Iraq "is unique," he said.

"No other living dictator has shown the same deadly combination of capability and intent, of aggression against its neighbors, pursuit of weapons of mass destruction, the use of chemical weapons against his own people as well as against his neighbors, oppression of his own people, support of terrorism, and the most threatening hostility to its neighbors, and to the United States, as has Iraq," he said.

---

With these kind of 'arguments' he'd fit right in on GFY.

He just forgot to mention the long term benifits from a post war Iraq. A war would also be a investment towards the economy.

7
Comment
Gutterboy

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 4751
Share

Post
#42

01-20-2003, 10:22 PM

Originally posted by kenny
He just forgot to mention the long term benifits from a post war Iraq. A war would also be a investment towards the economy.

What leads you to believe that the government or leader who replaces Saddam will be any more beneficial to the US than the current regime?

Before answering, think long and hard about the previous "successes" the United States has had over the last 30 years in engineering democracy and puppet governments.
Comment
MrPopup

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 3783
Share

Post
#43

01-20-2003, 10:24 PM

Originally posted by kenny
I watched this documentary of Sadam Hussein on TV recently about his rule over Iraq. He has rapist on payroll to rape peoples family members during interrogative procedure. He has also been known to have peoples children get tortured in front of them as a form of interrogation. Speaking agaisnt Sadam Hussein is punishable in written law by cutting out your tongue. He uses several torture methonds including acid baths, electric shock, etc.
The program also described how thick his security is. Estimated 20 doubles that appear in public for him. They said the real Sadam Hussein hasnt been video taped in public in 4 - 5 years.
Makes me appreciate the fact that I live in a country that gives me the right to speak and live with freedom. When the United States goes to war and removes the Sadam goverment it will benifit the US and the people of Iraq.

2 out of 3 Americans feel Saddam Hussein was responsible for the September 11th bombings. The American media machine at work.

<table cellspacing="0" cellpadding="3" border="1" bgcolor="#008000"><tr><td><font size=3>Gone</font></td></tr></table>
Comment
kenny

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 7245
Share

Post
#44

01-20-2003, 10:29 PM

Originally posted by Gutterboy

What leads you to believe that the government or leader who replaces Saddam will be any more beneficial to the US than the current regime?

Before answering, think long and hard about the previous "successes" the United States has had over the last 30 years in engineering democracy and puppet governments.

Can it be worse?

7
Comment
kenny

Confirmed User

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 7245
Share

Post
#45

01-20-2003, 10:34 PM

Originally posted by MrPopup

2 out of 3 Americans feel Saddam Hussein was responsible for the September 11th bombings. The American media machine at work.

Maybe he does have ties to Al Queda. The news in Iraq has to start with some positive image of Sadam. The US may have a media machine but atleast it can report freely

7
Comment
Matt_WildCash

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jan 2003

Posts: 1699
Share

Post
#46

01-20-2003, 10:36 PM

Originally posted by kenny
I watched this documentary of Sadam Hussein on TV recently about his rule over Iraq. He has rapist on payroll to rape peoples family members during interrogative procedure. He has also been known to have peoples children get tortured in front of them as a form of interrogation. Speaking agaisnt Sadam Hussein is punishable in written law by cutting out your tongue. He uses several torture methonds including acid baths, electric shock, etc.
The program also described how thick his security is. Estimated 20 doubles that appear in public for him. They said the real Sadam Hussein hasnt been video taped in public in 4 - 5 years.
Makes me appreciate the fact that I live in a country that gives me the right to speak and live with freedom. When the United States goes to war and removes the Sadam goverment it will benifit the US and the people of Iraq.

EXACTLY, people against war don't realize the shit those IRAQ's live in. That was once a rich country before Saddam took over and got the country barred from trade with other countries.

Even if the brain washed IRAQ's love Saddam who cares, I say liberate them and show them what life is really all about.

Try the New XMovies.com and make more $$$ with your Traffic
Comment
Forkbeard

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 2236
Share

Post
#47

01-20-2003, 10:44 PM

Originally posted by kenny
I watched this documentary of Sadam Hussein on TV recently about his rule over Iraq. He has rapist on payroll to rape peoples family members during interrogative procedure.

Yah, pretty old news. I saw this story on ErosBlog back in early December.

That documentary last night was pretty chilling, but it was clearly a propaganda piece. I hate being propagandized, even when there's some truth in it.

Offering sponsored blog posts and custom writing services.
Comment
theking

Nice Kitty

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 21053
Share

Post
#48

01-20-2003, 10:48 PM

Originally posted by Gutterboy

The current policy, supposedly, is one of preemptive strikes on countres which threaten the US. Saddam is not a threat to the US. His military is pathetic, he has no nuclear weapons, and its doubtful that he has enough chemical or biological weapons to do any real damage. N. Korea on the other hand has a real military, and nuclear weapons, and chem/bio weapons, and a crackpot dictator.

So if we're going to run around doing preemptive strikes, we should be invading N Korea, not Iraq. There is no reason to invade Iraq beyond the fact that Saddam is an obvious prick, and again, to be consistent, if we're going to invade Saddam for being a prick to his own people, there are lots of other countries we're going to have to do the same thing to. But we won't because Iraq is about Bush's personal grudge, not any rational need to invade to protect our interests.

That is the whole point of the anti-war movement. No one thinks Saddam is a nice guy or a model citizen, its the fact that Bush is obviously playing out his personal grudges rather than looking out for the interests & security of the nation that worries people. It worries alot of other countries too.

Your thinking is flawed. If Saddam is left to his own devices he will eventually acquire nukes. He is a dictator that has attacked Israel, Kuwaite, and Iran. He has demonstrated that he will use WMD's twice (Iran and his own people). He is going to be taken down before he acquires the power that N Korea currently has.

We have to attempt to deal with N Korea in a different way. N Korea has the ability to basically destroy S Korea in a matter of hours if not moments. If they use their Nukes Seoul is toast and tens of millions die in moments. Even if they did not use their nukes they still have the ability to kill hundreds of thousands of people in Seoul and do a repeat of the 1st Korean war which was to take over S Korea other than a small perimiter. Ultimately they would be defeated and this time forever, but the loss of life would be great. A war in Korea will destroy S Korea's economy. The loss of their economy will effect the world economy.

To invade Iraq before they can present the major problem that N Korea has become, is the smart thing to do. An invasion of Iraq will have little effect on the world economy, and will probably mean an improvement of the world economy. The USA will deal with N Korea, and militarily, if it has to, but hopefully we won't have to.

Last edited by theking; 01-20-2003, 11:04 PM.

When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
Comment
candidpublishinginc

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2001

Posts: 707
Share

Post
#49

01-20-2003, 11:23 PM

Originally posted by RocHard

The difference is we've been dealing with the Koreas since the 1950's. North Korea is a problem with a violation of a treaty; Iraq is killing it's own people. Huge difference.

No the difference here is that North Korea has a army of 1 million plus while Iraq has almost no army. Who will be more easy to take care of in a military fashion?

Also N. Korea is killing it's own people too and is run like one massive gulag. If one family member says something against the "Great Leader" the whole family can be thrown in a labor camp where they will die there within three months. There is proof that Kim also likes use people in his camps as human guinea pigs for nasty biological agent experiments.

Earn some education, he is just as bad as Saddam if not worse.....and with a bigger military meaning a war with N. Korea would be worse than the Vietnam war.

Candid Clicks
Earn up to 4 cents a click for blind link traffic!
NO CONVERSIONS, NO BS!
Comment
theking

Nice Kitty

Join Date: Sep 2002

Posts: 21053
Share

Post
#50

01-21-2003, 12:04 AM

Originally posted by candidpublishinginc

No the difference here is that North Korea has a army of 1 million plus while Iraq has almost no army. Who will be more easy to take care of in a military fashion?

Also N. Korea is killing it's own people too and is run like one massive gulag. If one family member says something against the "Great Leader" the whole family can be thrown in a labor camp where they will die there within three months. There is proof that Kim also likes use people in his camps as human guinea pigs for nasty biological agent experiments.

Earn some education, he is just as bad as Saddam if not worse.....and with a bigger military meaning a war with N. Korea would be worse than the Vietnam war.

Actually Iraq has a standing Army of around 400,000 and a million or more reservists. It also has more modern war machines than N Korea, but unlike N Koreans they are not fighters.

When you're running down my country hoss...you're walking on the fighting side of me!

FOR THE LYING LOWLIFE POSTING AS PATHFINDER...http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...athfinder.html
Comment

Previous 1 2 template Next

Working...