Acacia's use of Cnet property

Collapse
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • RiverRat19602003
    Registered User
    • Oct 2003
    • 39
    #1

    Acacia's use of Cnet property

    Can someone check their Acacia paperwork for the following:


    From Cnet site at

    http://www.cnet.com/aboutcnet/edito...ermissions.html

    In all cases, if permission is granted, stories must be reproduced in their entirety, unedited, and accompanied by the following copyright statement and credit: Used with permission from CNET Networks, Inc. Copyright 200__. All rights reserved."


    Does the Cnet stuff from Acacia say the above? If not, please post a copy. I'd like to let Cnet know.
    ----------------------------------------------------

    Add P2P File Sharing and Chat to your membership site!



    http://p2pposse.com/
    Tags: None
    • LuSiD
      Confirmed User
      • Dec 2002
      • 434
      #2
      They used this company to do their reprinting.

      RMS (Reprint Management Services)
      I bought a dog the other day... I named him Stay. It's fun to call him... "Come here, Stay! Come here, Stay!" He went insane. Now he just ignores me and keeps typing.

        Comment

        • GFED
          Confirmed User
          • May 2002
          • 8121
          #3
          https://www.flow.page/savethechildren

            Comment

            • GeXus
              Confirmed User
              • May 2003
              • 3320
              #4
              Im sure they did.. i meen who cares.. really.. you think it will make any difference even if they didnt get their permission?

                Comment

                • Mr.Fiction
                  Confirmed User
                  • Feb 2002
                  • 9484
                  #5
                  Originally posted by GeXus
                  Im sure they did.. i meen who cares.. really.. you think it will make any difference even if they didnt get their permission?
                  Isn't that the point of this whole issue?
                  Don't be lazy, protect free speech: ACLU | Free Speech Coalition | EFF | IMPA

                    Comment

                    • doober
                      Confirmed User
                      • Jul 2003
                      • 6984
                      #6
                      Originally posted by GeXus
                      Im sure they did.. i meen who cares.. really.. you think it will make any difference even if they didnt get their permission?
                      yes

                        Comment

                        • GFED
                          Confirmed User
                          • May 2002
                          • 8121
                          #7
                          .
                          https://www.flow.page/savethechildren

                            Comment

                            • GeXus
                              Confirmed User
                              • May 2003
                              • 3320
                              #8
                              Originally posted by Mr.Fiction


                              Isn't that the point of this whole issue?
                              My point is, they arent stupid.. I meen Yes, We are all against them, but its not like a two clueless guys in a basement somewhere.. of course they have cnets permission.

                                Comment

                                • tootie
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Jun 2003
                                  • 6041
                                  #9
                                  Originally posted by GeXus


                                  My point is, they arent stupid.. I meen Yes, We are all against them, but its not like a two clueless guys in a basement somewhere.. of course they have cnets permission.
                                  They can't be TOO smart.

                                  They're charging multiple times for the same infringement. (The content provider, the affiliate program and the affiliates.)

                                  They're sending packets out to people using usernames (some of them obscene) instead of doing research to find out who the people actually are.

                                  They're sending out packets to DESIGNERS, some of whom have no sites at all.

                                  They're sending out packets to people who don't have any videos at all but that just LINK to sites that do....

                                  They don't sound too bright to me...


                                    Comment

                                    Previous template Next
                                    Working...