ACACIA - I Know Which Sponsor Ratted You Out

**freeadultcontent** · 10-22-2003, 07:28 PM

Originally posted by Battuss
Goddamn, 2 hours of nothing.

Its 5:30 in the morning here.

I give you guys 10 mins more to come up with a name

hit me on icq, and i will tell ya what my thoughts are, but its gotta be in the next 3 min or so.

**BRISK** · 10-22-2003, 07:28 PM

Originally posted by ZoiNk

Source: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/da...a_8kex99-1.txt

In September 2003, the Acacia Technologies group caused 42 websites owned by Go Entertainment, Inc. to be closed down. The websites were continuing to utilize Acacia Technologies group's DMT technology in violation of a court order. The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California issued an injunction prohibiting Go Entertainment from continuing to use Acacia Technologies group's DMT technology without a license. The Acacia Technologies group successfully enforced the injunction against Go Entertainment's web hosting company.
On September 22, 2003, the Acacia Technologies group entered into a license agreement for its DMT technology with Go Entertainment, Inc.

ZoiNk

They settled after that though and were back up

**Dirty F** · 10-22-2003, 07:30 PM

Originally posted by freeadultcontent

hit me on icq, and i will tell ya what my thoughts are, but its gotta be in the next 3 min or so.

Wait, dont go...

cant find your icq.

**sexeducation** · 10-22-2003, 07:30 PM

Originally posted by ZoiNk

Source: http://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/da...a_8kex99-1.txt

In September 2003, the Acacia Technologies group caused 42 websites owned by Go Entertainment, Inc. to be closed down. The websites were continuing to utilize Acacia Technologies group's DMT technology in violation of a court order. The U.S. District Court for the Central District of California issued an injunction prohibiting Go Entertainment from continuing to use Acacia Technologies group's DMT technology without a license. The Acacia Technologies group successfully enforced the injunction against Go Entertainment's web hosting company.
On September 22, 2003, the Acacia Technologies group entered into a license agreement for its DMT technology with Go Entertainment, Inc.

ZoiNk

that is a ZOINK for sure ...
a bouble zoink

**Dirty F** · 10-22-2003, 07:30 PM

Heheh got it

**sexeducation** · 10-22-2003, 07:32 PM

Originally posted by BRISK

They settled after that though and were back up

And the question remains ...
how are you proving your "grosse sales" to calculate the 2%?

When Acacia says - "we don't believe your sales figures" now what? Give them all your affiliate details right?

**Holly** · 10-22-2003, 07:34 PM

They wouldn't care if they don't have/depend on affiliates. If they provide a service to webmasters or take payments from them, they'd still have addresses.

**Dirty F** · 10-22-2003, 07:36 PM

Ahh and the plot thickens.

Thanks freeadultcontent, i will sleep better now.

**sexeducation** · 10-22-2003, 07:36 PM

Originally posted by Holly
They wouldn't care if they don't have/depend on affiliates. If they provide a service to webmasters or take payments from them, they'd still have addresses.

I'm not following your post ...
please reword

**Holly** · 10-22-2003, 07:36 PM

Companies who've gone belly up (think: processors) lately, or know that they soon will be, don't have much to lose either.

**Holly** · 10-22-2003, 07:38 PM

Originally posted by sexeducation

I'm not following your post ...
please reword

How's this:

Fuck off, eat shit, and die, you sick pedo child molester.

**Hooper** · 10-22-2003, 07:39 PM

for the love of R-n.

affiliates in our business and the way we refer to them is NOTHING like what the legal term that acacia is using means.

acacia uses affiliates to refer to companies owned by your company. like gm owns direct tv. so directtv is an affiliate of gm.

but my local magazine advertises direct tv, and lots of local entrepreneurs sell direct tv for a comission. that makes them "advertisers" and "comissioned sales reps"... not affiliates.

the phrase "affiliate marketing" has gotten all twisted out of shape.

**SleazyDream** · 10-22-2003, 07:39 PM

Originally posted by Hooper
i'll tell you this much. boycotting them wont do a damned thing. they dont give a fuck.

things other than boycotting can be done to a RAT

**BRISK** · 10-22-2003, 07:41 PM

Originally posted by Hooper
for the love of R-n.

affiliates in our business and the way we refer to them is NOTHING like what the legal term that acacia is using means.

acacia uses affiliates to refer to companies owned by your company. like gm owns direct tv. so directtv is an affiliate of gm.

but my local magazine advertises direct tv, and lots of local entrepreneurs sell direct tv for a comission. that makes them "advertisers" and "comissioned sales reps"... not affiliates.

the phrase "affiliate marketing" has gotten all twisted out of shape.

Yes, but an affiliate program still could have provided their affiliates details in order to cut a sweet deal.

**sexeducation** · 10-22-2003, 07:44 PM

Originally posted by BRISK

Yes, but an affiliate program still could have provided their affiliates details in order to cut a sweet deal.

Yes ...
it's like double and triple dipping ...

<h3>I will NOT report to ACACIA - ever!</3>

They have NO right to my membership database.

ACACIA - I Know Which Sponsor Ratted You Out

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment

Comment