Production Hold Issued by PASS After Positive HIV Test 🚨

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Kelli58
    Confirmed User
    • Aug 2006
    • 2260

    #1

    Production Hold Issued by PASS After Positive HIV Test 🚨

    PASS (Performer Availability Screening Services) has issued an immediate preliminary production hold across the adult industry after a performer tested positive for HIV.

    👉 The hold applies to all scenes involving fluid exchange, including work by independent creators, and will stay in effect until further notice.

    PASS is currently conducting contact tracing and retesting. The hold could last just a few days if all exposed performers are cleared quickly, but could extend up to 14 days if risks or delays arise.

    ❗ What’s Paused:

    Penetrative sex scenes
    Oral sex with ejaculation
    Shared toy use
    Any acts involving bodily fluid exchange

    ✅ What’s Still Allowed:

    Solo content
    Non-shared toy use
    Masturbation near a partner
    Kissing
    Non-fluid-exchange BDSM scenes

    PASS urges full compliance and reminds performers: anyone who chooses not to work during this time must be respected.

    These holds are rare but vital in protecting the health of the performer community.

    🛑 Safety comes first — always.

    👉 Read the full story at
    https://fleshbot.com/biz/post/prelim...tive-hiv-test/
    💎 Earn Money by Helping Content Creators Earn More. 💎 The most unique affiliate program in the game. There are more than 1.5 million OnlyFans creators. Here's your chance to make money from them!
  • TheLegacy
    SEO RobertWarrenSEO.com
    • Apr 2003
    • 18116

    #2
    so is the idea that someone lied or faked their pass? or did the testing facility make a mistake?

    RobertWarrenSEO.com
    Telegram: @TheLegacy54

    Comment

    • ReggieDurango
      Confirmed User
      • Nov 2007
      • 4784

      #3
      Originally posted by TheLegacy
      so is the idea that someone lied or faked their pass? or did the testing facility make a mistake?
      Umm no, quite the opposite. I don't think anyone lied or faked their test. But I could be wrong! We'll see...

      Comment

      • natkejs
        Confirmed User
        • Jan 2003
        • 1640

        #4
        Originally posted by TheLegacy
        so is the idea that someone lied or faked their pass? or did the testing facility make a mistake?
        Granted I'm not a doctor, but considering that it can take several months for an HIV infection to show up on a test, while I believe you need to get tested every few weeks -- there is always the off chance that an infection becomes detectable during that window.

        Not necessarily faked or any error involved, just unfortunate.

        Comment

        • Christianx
          Rubber Duck Collector
          • Sep 2005
          • 159

          #5
          Originally posted by TheLegacy
          so is the idea that someone lied or faked their pass? or did the testing facility make a mistake?
          what a strange thing to infer. This is what I would assume happened based on all of the previous infections - The performer had a negative test and filmed using that negative test for the 2 week period. and then when they retested it popped positive.

          So now you have to retest all the performers who filmed with that person during those 2 weeks. This is the first generation.

          Then you have to find all the performers who worked with the first generation performers and retest them as well. This is the second generation.

          Usually the initial positive performer contracted HIV from someone outside of the testing pool.
          WWW.PUREMEDIAENTERPRISES.COM

          Comment

          • TheLegacy
            SEO RobertWarrenSEO.com
            • Apr 2003
            • 18116

            #6
            Originally posted by natkejs
            Granted I'm not a doctor, but considering that it can take several months for an HIV infection to show up on a test, while I believe you need to get tested every few weeks -- there is always the off chance that an infection becomes detectable during that window.

            Not necessarily faked or any error involved, just unfortunate.
            The time it takes for HIV to show up on a blood test depends on the type of test used. Antibody tests, the most common, can detect HIV 23-90 days after exposure, while antigen/antibody tests can detect HIV 18-90 days after exposure. Nucleic acid tests (NATs) can detect HIV 10-33 days after exposure

            although anything is possible I was merely curious as to what they found was the reason

            RobertWarrenSEO.com
            Telegram: @TheLegacy54

            Comment

            • Kelli58
              Confirmed User
              • Aug 2006
              • 2260

              #7
              No fake test. Some guy popped after coming home from XBIZ Miami. We don't know who just that he's a mainstream performer.
              💎 Earn Money by Helping Content Creators Earn More. 💎 The most unique affiliate program in the game. There are more than 1.5 million OnlyFans creators. Here's your chance to make money from them!

              Comment

              • Tasty1
                Bla bla blaa
                • Jan 2005
                • 9529

                #8
                Aren´t performers using Prep?

                everything is fake

                Comment

                • EdgyBuzz
                  Acquisitions
                  • Feb 2015
                  • 108

                  #9
                  The hold has been lifted
                  https://www.passcertified.org/news/p...tely-6-12-2025

                  Comment

                  Working...