Hentai CP, what the hell?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • czarina
    Webmaster Extraordinaire
    • Jul 2002
    • 10751

    #1

    Hentai CP, what the hell?

    I was browsing thru hentai sites today and I came across an otherwise legal looking hentai TGP site that in one of the sample thumbs had a drawing of a little girl (I'm talking like 6 or 7 years old) being molested by an adult.
    Does this quality as CP? Should I report it?
  • DefaultMan
    Confirmed User
    • Nov 2006
    • 1869

    #2
    As someone who enjoys hentai (NOT the CP kind) you tend to come across that alot
    mypornolife [at] gmail [dot] com

    Comment

    • candyflip
      Carpe Visio
      • Jul 2002
      • 43074

      #3
      That's actually protected free speech. Upheld by the Supreme Court.

      Spend you some brain.
      Email Me

      Comment

      • czarina
        Webmaster Extraordinaire
        • Jul 2002
        • 10751

        #4
        Originally posted by candyflip
        That's actually protected free speech. Upheld by the Supreme Court.
        that's so messed up. I'm very open about adult stuff and it's hard to shock me, but as the mom of a 4-year old, I'm outraged. How can that be legal? And then they mess with regular pornographers, unbelievable! This world is upside down.

        Comment

        • pornpf69
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Jun 2004
          • 15782

          #5
          how can a cartoon be CP?
          I don't get that...

          Comment

          • czarina
            Webmaster Extraordinaire
            • Jul 2002
            • 10751

            #6
            I'm not going to post the image here, but it depicts an adult molesting a very young kid. Isn't that the whole concept of CP? Granted, no actual children were molested in it since it's a toon, but the idea is actually disturbing.

            Comment

            • Pleasurepays
              BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES
              • Aug 2002
              • 11913

              #7
              Originally posted by czarina
              I'm not going to post the image here, but it depicts an adult molesting a very young kid. Isn't that the whole concept of CP? Granted, no actual children were molested in it since it's a toon, but the idea is actually disturbing.
              if you draw a cartoonish pic of someone getting killed, does that make someone a murderer?
              Last edited by Pleasurepays; 10-02-2009, 03:45 PM.

              Comment

              • Loch
                Confirmed User
                • Feb 2002
                • 7674

                #8
                This has always been a very talked about subject.
                Its not real "really its not?", im imho what it does is feed sick peoples fantasies and THAT alone should be punishable by law

                People who make toons like this have a very clear focus, target the pedophiles....thereby feeding into their sick twisted fantasies
                Why else make this? Its not like normal people would watch it let alone BUY it.

                BUT, this does go under the touchy subject of freedom of speech etc etc

                Contact us for Beta store access (4000 HD/SD productions) - Editing - Encoding/Post production
                ICQ - 277 862 930 E-mail casper /@/ cool-content.com

                Comment

                • brassmonkey
                  Pay It Forward
                  • Sep 2005
                  • 77390

                  #9
                  Originally posted by czarina
                  I was browsing thru hentai sites today and I came across an otherwise legal looking hentai TGP site that in one of the sample thumbs had a drawing of a little girl (I'm talking like 6 or 7 years old) being molested by an adult.
                  Does this quality as CP? Should I report it?
                  your avatar is distracting me
                  TRUMP 2026 KEKAW!!! - The Laken Riley Act Is Law!
                  DACA ENDED - SUPPORT AZ HCR 2060 52R - email: brassballz-at-techie.com

                  Comment

                  • Fletch XXX
                    GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
                    • Jan 2002
                    • 60840

                    #10
                    the same was said about britney spears photos of her face (underage) photoshopped on adult models nude bodies.

                    its legal, legit, and not CP, itsd not much different from a story, and incest stories are legal too

                    Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?

                    Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

                    Comment

                    • After Shock Media
                      It's coming look busy
                      • Mar 2001
                      • 35299

                      #11
                      Originally posted by czarina
                      that's so messed up. I'm very open about adult stuff and it's hard to shock me, but as the mom of a 4-year old, I'm outraged. How can that be legal? And then they mess with regular pornographers, unbelievable! This world is upside down.
                      You see in just about every law there needs to be a victim. Typically the accused also gets to address such. It falls under habeas corpus.

                      I am more shocked that this is new to you. Just about all hentai is underage girls/boys having sex, getting molested, or being raped by tentacles.

                      It also was why it was a shock when an author got busted for CP for writting about it. Again pure bullshit.
                      Back you trolls, this does not mean I am pro cp. I am just anti thought crimes.

                      [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                      Comment

                      • Libertine
                        sex dwarf
                        • May 2002
                        • 17860

                        #12
                        Originally posted by czarina
                        that's so messed up. I'm very open about adult stuff and it's hard to shock me, but as the mom of a 4-year old, I'm outraged. How can that be legal? And then they mess with regular pornographers, unbelievable! This world is upside down.
                        What exactly are you outraged about? The exploitation of imaginary children? The right of people to imagine things that you find disturbing? The right of people to turn those imaginations into drawings?

                        Tens if not hundreds of thousands of actual children are being abused worldwide, and you decide to focus on what truly matters: drawings. Great job there, genius.
                        /(bb|[^b]{2})/

                        Comment

                        • Iron Fist
                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                          • Dec 2006
                          • 23400

                          #13
                          Don't think about killing someone either... that might be illegal too soon.
                          i like waffles

                          Comment

                          • DVTimes
                            xxx
                            • Jun 2003
                            • 31650

                            #14
                            in the uk I belive its illigall.
                            XXX

                            Comment

                            • moeloubani
                              Confirmed User
                              • Dec 2007
                              • 4235

                              #15
                              in canada it's illegal, alongside of any picture of a girl that is meant to make the girl look underage (even if she isn't), so are stories with underage stuff in them, i agree completely the only problem is how that is interpreted by different people

                              here is a dude who (i didnt read the whole thing so I'm not sure if there was more to it than this one picture) was charged and was at trial for a picture from chloe18.com

                              http://canlii.org/eliisa/highlight.d...008oncj97.html

                              he was found not guilty because they couldn't be sure that she was under 18 but they used things like her wearing a pink ring or bracelet against the guy. kind of shitty in that regards that the dude was being fucked for something that was obviously consenting adults doing something consenting and in the corner it said chloe18 (emphasis on 18) and they still went after him.

                              gives the police leeway to say this or that constitutes child pornography based just on a qualitative observation even if the girl is 18+ so thats kind of shitty, ever since i read that ive tried to steer clear of those sites and once in a while ill run across a picture or video and be like fuck, could i get in shit for this? even though its from a reputable site/production company

                              Comment

                              • alias
                                aliasx
                                • Apr 2001
                                • 19010

                                #16
                                CP is bad mmmmmk.

                                https://porncorporation.com

                                Comment

                                • Deej
                                  I make pixels work
                                  • Jun 2005
                                  • 24386

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by Libertine
                                  What exactly are you outraged about? The exploitation of imaginary children? The right of people to imagine things that you find disturbing? The right of people to turn those imaginations into drawings?

                                  Tens if not hundreds of thousands of actual children are being abused worldwide, and you decide to focus on what truly matters: drawings. Great job there, genius.
                                  No child was hurt but soe people are disgusted by the thought and perpetuation of child molestation...

                                  Her thought to report it is unsubstantiated, but her thought to be repulsed by the imagery does not make her a retard...

                                  Take your horse shit outside...

                                  Deej's Designs n' What Not
                                  Hit me up for Design, CSS & Photo Retouching


                                  Icq#30096880

                                  Comment

                                  • Libertine
                                    sex dwarf
                                    • May 2002
                                    • 17860

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by Deej
                                    No child was hurt but soe people are disgusted by the thought and perpetuation of child molestation...

                                    Her thought to report it is unsubstantiated, but her thought to be repulsed by the imagery does not make her a retard...

                                    Take your horse shit outside...
                                    I didn't call her a retard, you idiot. (for the record: I did just call you an idiot)

                                    The question of "how can that be legal?", however, is pretty dumb. Even if you are disgusted at seeing certain drawings, it should be quite obvious why they can be legal simply because they're drawings.
                                    /(bb|[^b]{2})/

                                    Comment

                                    • Fletch XXX
                                      GFY HALL OF FAME DAMMIT!!!
                                      • Jan 2002
                                      • 60840

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by moeloubani

                                      he was found not guilty because they couldn't be sure that she was under 18 but they used things like her wearing a pink ring or bracelet against the guy. kind of shitty in that regards that the dude was being fucked for something that was obviously consenting adults doing something consenting and in the corner it said chloe18 (emphasis on 18) and they still went after him.
                                      only in america,.... wait...

                                      Want an Android App for your tube, membership, or free site?

                                      Need banners or promo material? Hit us up (ICQ Fletch: 148841377) or email me fletchxxx at gmail.com - recent work - About me

                                      Comment

                                      • Davy
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Apr 2006
                                        • 4323

                                        #20
                                        Even the Bart Simpsons porn was discussed to be illegal not long ago.
                                        So yes, that stuff is illegal.
                                        ---
                                        ICQ 14-76-98 <-- I don't use this at all

                                        Comment

                                        • After Shock Media
                                          It's coming look busy
                                          • Mar 2001
                                          • 35299

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by Davy
                                          Even the Bart Simpsons porn was discussed to be illegal not long ago.
                                          So yes, that stuff is illegal.
                                          Provide proof.

                                          [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                                          Comment

                                          • Glenn Beck
                                            So Fucking Banned
                                            • Sep 2009
                                            • 408

                                            #22

                                            Comment

                                            • Glenn Beck
                                              So Fucking Banned
                                              • Sep 2009
                                              • 408

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by Davy
                                              Even the Bart Simpsons porn was discussed to be illegal not long ago.
                                              So yes, that stuff is illegal.
                                              Never let a silly thing like "knowing what the hell you are talking about" get in the way of opening your big fat dumb mouth I say.
                                              Originally posted by the supreme court
                                              cartoon drawings that formed the basis for the charges . . . because cartoon figures are not depictions of actual people. He argues that § 1466A(a)(1) necessarily requires that the visual depictions be of actual minors and that if the depiction of an actual minor is not required, then [it] would be unconstitutional on its face under . . . Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition, 535 U.S. 234 (2002).

                                              Comment

                                              • After Shock Media
                                                It's coming look busy
                                                • Mar 2001
                                                • 35299

                                                #24
                                                Not sure which fake nick troll, glen beck is, hell even a tube sig for surfers; but didnt eirc sort of make a new rules about certain images and shit?

                                                hmm lets see.

                                                [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                                                Comment

                                                • Glenn Beck
                                                  So Fucking Banned
                                                  • Sep 2009
                                                  • 408

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by After Shock Media
                                                  Not sure which fake nick troll, glen beck is, hell even a tube sig for surfers; but didnt eirc sort of make a new rules about certain images and shit?

                                                  hmm lets see.
                                                  shitting dick nipples are well within the image rules as they are currently posted

                                                  5) Posting images of death, dismemberment, or animal cruelty will not be permitted and will be removed.
                                                  Besides, only a Socialist would ban a good, honest, hardworking America such as myself.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • After Shock Media
                                                    It's coming look busy
                                                    • Mar 2001
                                                    • 35299

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by Glenn Beck
                                                    shitting dick nipples are well within the image rules as they are currently posted



                                                    Besides, only a Socialist would ban a good, honest, hardworking America such as myself.
                                                    Do not really super care. Your posting for shock value. Your obviously a fake nick and know the rules well. You even went out of your way to direct link to a tube site for sufer access.

                                                    I am sorry your life has to suck so bad to feel the need to troll this place under a fake name. I hope it turns around for you.

                                                    [email protected] ICQ:135982156 AIM: Aftershockmed1a MSN: [email protected]

                                                    Comment

                                                    • Glenn Beck
                                                      So Fucking Banned
                                                      • Sep 2009
                                                      • 408

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by After Shock Media
                                                      Do not really super care. Your posting for shock value. Your obviously a fake nick and know the rules well. You even went out of your way to direct link to a tube site for sufer access.

                                                      I am sorry your life has to suck so bad to feel the need to troll this place under a fake name. I hope it turns around for you.
                                                      You, sir, are the only one trolling in this topic. I would appreciate greatly if you could allow me to express my god given first amendment rights in this topic without your undue and uncalled for harassment.

                                                      Mind your own business Mr. "After Shock Media". Which I can only assume is your real full name.

                                                      Comment

                                                      • SomeCreep
                                                        :glugglug
                                                        • Mar 2003
                                                        • 26118

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by Glenn Beck

                                                        Webair Hosting

                                                        I use and recommend Webair for hosting.

                                                        Comment

                                                        • NickB.
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Aug 2001
                                                          • 8865

                                                          #29
                                                          I did read they are putting a smack down on it in Canada
                                                          Makes total sense to me

                                                          Comment

                                                          • Deej
                                                            I make pixels work
                                                            • Jun 2005
                                                            • 24386

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by Libertine
                                                            I didn't call her a retard, you idiot. (for the record: I did just call you an idiot)

                                                            The question of "how can that be legal?", however, is pretty dumb. Even if you are disgusted at seeing certain drawings, it should be quite obvious why they can be legal simply because they're drawings.
                                                            What a technical douche nozzle you are.

                                                            Sometimes you come off with some good intellect, but most times your crass dickhead nature comes out.

                                                            obviously you didnt call her a retard... but you tried to down her simply for being offended by CP drawings.

                                                            Now most people know that being that they are drawings that they are not deemed CP, but still, it depicts the act of molesting/raping/harming a child.

                                                            As a person with a child she has every right to be offended.

                                                            Is it illegal... no... should it be out there... no...

                                                            Not surprised though coming from you. Werent you here boasting several times about banging pretty young asian girls?

                                                            Deej's Designs n' What Not
                                                            Hit me up for Design, CSS & Photo Retouching


                                                            Icq#30096880

                                                            Comment

                                                            Working...