Would PornHub.com, Tube8.com,and KeezMovies.com agree to responding to DMCA's on GFY?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Young
    Bland for life
    • Nov 2004
    • 10468

    #1

    Would PornHub.com, Tube8.com,and KeezMovies.com agree to responding to DMCA's on GFY?

    Maybe a thread where content owners could post links to videos they wanted taken down?

    I'm guessing the answer is going to be a resounding no...but worth a shot.
    ★★★
  • Young
    Bland for life
    • Nov 2004
    • 10468

    #2
    And by DMCA's I obviously mean take down requests.

    Maybe the "unaffiliated" TrafficJunky can get word to someone who matters.
    ★★★

    Comment

    • Barefootsies
      Choice is an Illusion
      • Feb 2005
      • 42635

      #3
      Are they refusing DMCA's?
      Should You Email Your Members?

      Link1 | Link2 | Link3

      Enough Said.

      "Would you rather live like a king for a year or like a prince forever?"

      Comment

      • Young
        Bland for life
        • Nov 2004
        • 10468

        #4
        Originally posted by Barefootsies
        Are they refusing DMCA's?
        No. But the "I didn't get an email request" is a little harder to pull off in a thread.

        Someone started a thread that linked to a handful of their videos and they magically disappeared within 5 minutes. You don't get that kind of response via email.
        ★★★

        Comment

        • grumpy
          Too lazy to set a custom title
          • Jan 2002
          • 9870

          #5
          why not a class law suite. Looks like a lot of people are hurt by them
          Don't let greediness blur your vision | You gotta let some shit slide
          icq - 441-456-888

          Comment

          • Zorgman
            Confirmed User
            • Aug 2002
            • 6103

            #6
            What law are they going to sue them under? You took my content so i sue you...
            There is a law that protects them. It also protects every site that links to and hosts content from someone else. Just like google does. If a tube site goes down, chances are google will be attacted by that law too.
            ---

            Comment

            • Riffhard
              Confirmed User
              • Jul 2009
              • 659

              #7
              This is off-topic, but I don't wanna start another tube thread: why don't they need a landing page with a disclaimer and an "enter or exit" option?
              Glad to be here. Glad to be anywhere.

              Comment

              • MrDeiz
                • May 2008
                • 9802

                #8
                isn't it the same that closing those tubes?

                there just won't be any video left (besides brazzers i guess)
                Make money with WEBC$MS
                The only way to still make money in adult

                Comment

                • FightThisPatent
                  Confirmed User
                  • Aug 2003
                  • 4090

                  #9
                  Originally posted by Young
                  Maybe a thread where content owners could post links to videos they wanted taken down?

                  I'm guessing the answer is going to be a resounding no...but worth a shot.

                  its a no, because you have to provide them with info to prove you are the content owner.,

                  otherwise, you could submit DMCA requests to knock off your competitors.

                  pornhub has a dmca page:

                  http://www.pornhub.com/dmca


                  from a link on the front of their site, where everyone has it.


                  Fight the click challenged!

                  http://www.t3report.com
                  (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
                  http://www.FightThePatent.com
                  | ICQ 52741957

                  Comment

                  • fatfoo
                    ICQ:649699063
                    • Mar 2003
                    • 27763

                    #10
                    I don't think they would do that. A thread like that on gfy would be too much bad publicity for pornhub, wouldn't it.
                    Send me an email: [email protected]

                    Comment

                    • FightThisPatent
                      Confirmed User
                      • Aug 2003
                      • 4090

                      #11
                      if you have not put your content onto a CD/DVD and sent it in for copyright protection, then you have less of a legal ground to sue for copyright infringement.

                      find an attorney, and have them show you the process. then every month, as you produce new content, send it in. the filing fee is low and gives you legal grounds to stand on.


                      Fight the copywrongs!

                      http://www.t3report.com
                      (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
                      http://www.FightThePatent.com
                      | ICQ 52741957

                      Comment

                      • fris
                        I have to go potty
                        • Aug 2002
                        • 55991

                        #12
                        just a reminder trafficjunky = brazzers
                        Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence.


                        Only Fans Data

                        20+ Custom Adult Themes and Plugins

                        Comment

                        • BigDeanEvans
                          So Fucking Banned
                          • Apr 2006
                          • 1368

                          #13
                          Could you sue the host for unfair practices if the host is incorporated in the same state as you are?

                          Comment

                          • Dirty Dane
                            Sick Fuck
                            • Feb 2004
                            • 9491

                            #14
                            Originally posted by fris
                            just a reminder trafficjunky = brazzers
                            Thanks .

                            Comment

                            • PornMD
                              Mainstream Businessman
                              • Jan 2007
                              • 9291

                              #15
                              Originally posted by fris
                              just a reminder trafficjunky = brazzers
                              omg i didnt no !!1
                              Want to crush it in mainstream with Facebook ads? Hit me up.

                              Comment

                              • SleazyDream
                                I'm here for SPORT
                                • Jul 2001
                                • 41470

                                #16
                                Originally posted by Zorgman
                                What law are they going to sue them under? You took my content so i sue you...
                                There is a law that protects them. It also protects every site that links to and hosts content from someone else. Just like google does. If a tube site goes down, chances are google will be attacted by that law too.
                                that 'law' doesn't provide protection for selective choosing of the videos.
                                This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!

                                Now read without the word dog.

                                Comment

                                • gideongallery
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Aug 2003
                                  • 7082

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by FightThisPatent
                                  its a no, because you have to provide them with info to prove you are the content owner.,

                                  otherwise, you could submit DMCA requests to knock off your competitors.

                                  pornhub has a dmca page:

                                  http://www.pornhub.com/dmca


                                  from a link on the front of their site, where everyone has it.


                                  Fight the click challenged!
                                  bump for someone who actually understands the law

                                  the entire point of the safe harbor provision is to make sure that legitimate fair use of content are not censored by the take down process.

                                  adding a external thread, outside the scope of the proper notification process would undermine that as much as not having the safe harbor at all.

                                  “When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve Wozniak

                                  Comment

                                  • SleazyDream
                                    I'm here for SPORT
                                    • Jul 2001
                                    • 41470

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by Zorgman
                                    What law are they going to sue them under? You took my content so i sue you...
                                    There is a law that protects them. It also protects every site that links to and hosts content from someone else. Just like google does. If a tube site goes down, chances are google will be attacted by that law too.
                                    copywright theft

                                    you charge for licence to use content - if they didn't pay licence - they is theft that is suable in small claims court.

                                    problem is all you fuckwads like sucking BIG dick so if it isn't a 10 million dollar lawsuit you won't do it
                                    This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!

                                    Now read without the word dog.

                                    Comment

                                    • FightThisPatent
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Aug 2003
                                      • 4090

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by SleazyDream
                                      copywright theft

                                      you charge for licence to use content - if they didn't pay licence - they is theft that is suable in small claims court.

                                      while it would be easy to get jurisdiction in your own town for small claims court, the problem is just that , "small claims".

                                      copyright infringement goes up to $150,000 per infraction. each download of a video counts as 1 strike, so you can see how the dollar amount can be much higher than the cap of small claims court.

                                      i know it varies from state to state, but one state i was in it was like $3500 when i looked into it.

                                      you need to get your content copyrighted. it doesn't cost much, and you can do it on a monthly basis as you create the content.

                                      if you don't get a copyright, you have a whole lot harder time of proving copyright infringement.


                                      Fight the big claims court!

                                      ps. once you have copyrighted material being stolen, and you have sent DMCA request, and they haven't taken it down (in a "reasonable period of time", like 48 hours), then you have a potential case.

                                      there are some attorneys who might take the case on contingency if you have a solid case.

                                      to be in this game, you have to first have your stuff documented with copyright. if you don't have that, your back to playing putt putt instead of up at bat.
                                      Last edited by FightThisPatent; 09-24-2009, 03:05 PM.

                                      http://www.t3report.com
                                      (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
                                      http://www.FightThePatent.com
                                      | ICQ 52741957

                                      Comment

                                      • Quentin
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Dec 2002
                                        • 1280

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by gideongallery
                                        bump for someone who actually understands the law

                                        the entire point of the safe harbor provision is to make sure that legitimate fair use of content are not censored by the take down process.

                                        adding a external thread, outside the scope of the proper notification process would undermine that as much as not having the safe harbor at all.
                                        I wouldn't go so far as to say that's the "entire point" of the safe harbor (it's also there to limit liability for legitimate ISPs/OSPs with respect to the bad acts of their clients/users), but GG and FTP are correct; such sites really cannot legally/properly respond to take down requests made outside of the proper channels.

                                        I don't have the case citation handy, but there's some recent case law that's pretty squarely on point for this.
                                        Q. Boyer

                                        Comment

                                        • FightThisPatent
                                          Confirmed User
                                          • Aug 2003
                                          • 4090

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by Quentin

                                          I don't have the case citation handy, but there's some recent case law that's pretty squarely on point for this.
                                          i was wondering when my fellow arm-chair attorney was going to show up

                                          yes that's right, Quentin esquire, from the law firm of Q, FTP, GFY, WTF, and CYA LLC

                                          Fight the LOL!

                                          http://www.t3report.com
                                          (where's the traffic?) v5.0 is out! |
                                          http://www.FightThePatent.com
                                          | ICQ 52741957

                                          Comment

                                          • Quentin
                                            Confirmed User
                                            • Dec 2002
                                            • 1280

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by FightThisPatent
                                            i was wondering when my fellow arm-chair attorney was going to show up

                                            yes that's right, Quentin esquire, from the law firm of Q, FTP, GFY, WTF, and CYA LLC

                                            Fight the LOL!
                                            Guilty as charged. LOL

                                            Edit -- except that should be "PLLC," no? ;-)

                                            - Q.
                                            Q. Boyer

                                            Comment

                                            • digitaldivas
                                              ..I Heart Cannibal Corpse
                                              • Sep 2007
                                              • 4328

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by SleazyDream
                                              copywright theft

                                              you charge for licence to use content - if they didn't pay licence - they is theft that is suable in small claims court.

                                              problem is all you fuckwads like sucking BIG dick so if it isn't a 10 million dollar lawsuit you won't do it
                                              I do it if I see my content places that it shouldn't be, no matter what the amount. I do see your point though.
                                              ...

                                              Comment

                                              • Young
                                                Bland for life
                                                • Nov 2004
                                                • 10468

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by fatfoo
                                                I don't think they would do that. A thread like that on gfy would be too much bad publicity for pornhub, wouldn't it.
                                                exactly. and that is why the links that were posted in every other thread were removed so quickly.

                                                i think most people misunderstood what I was trying to say. it's not only a matter of having them take your content down....it's a way to show everyone the obscene amounts of unauthorized content being used no these sites.
                                                ★★★

                                                Comment

                                                • Agent 488
                                                  Registered User
                                                  • Feb 2006
                                                  • 22511

                                                  #25
                                                  would a pigeon drive a 4X4?

                                                  Comment

                                                  • iTouch!
                                                    So Fucking Banned
                                                    • Sep 2007
                                                    • 1457

                                                    #26
                                                    does a bear shit in the woods?

                                                    Comment

                                                    Working...