Linux cent os 5,beacuse it easiest.People promote freebsd beacuse of it's security,but freebsd doesn't have thing anything special when it comes to security except many disabled features which sometimes make it hard to manage it.So if you want linux with security of freebsd,you just need to harden system with things like bastila and grsecurity plus firewall,mod security and many other things.
Linux cent os 5,beacuse it easiest.People promote freebsd beacuse of it's security,but freebsd doesn't have thing anything special when it comes to security except many disabled features which sometimes make it hard to manage it.So if you want linux with security of freebsd,you just need to harden system with things like bastila and grsecurity plus firewall,mod security and many other things.
I have been a fan of freebsd myself because if the outofthebox security
It's managed hosting, and the host (www.isprime.com in this case) provides both.
I wanted to hear your answers and compare it with theirs
I?m running FreeBSD at ISPimre. Since you?re doing managed hosting, go with what they recommend. After all, they?re the ones that have to do the maintenance and support.
BTW, what email server are you planning to run?
The Only Time When Success Comes Before Work Is In A Dictionary.
Did you ever notice: When you put the 2 words 'The' and 'IRS' together it spells 'Theirs.'
I’m running FreeBSD at ISPimre. Since you’re doing managed hosting, go with what they recommend. After all, they’re the ones that have to do the maintenance and support.
BTW, what email server are you planning to run?
Thx
The email will be on my local MS exchange server here in denmark, just need a smtp relay on the server
Linux cent os 5,beacuse it easiest.People promote freebsd beacuse of it's security,but freebsd doesn't have thing anything special when it comes to security except many disabled features which sometimes make it hard to manage it.So if you want linux with security of freebsd,you just need to harden system with things like bastila and grsecurity plus firewall,mod security and many other things.
I wont go in to details about the setup for obvious reasons.
The mail lands on MX A (smtp) and relays it to MX B wich is my exchange server.
MX B Only accept incomming traffic from MX A.
That keeps the ddos attacks and scriptkiddies away.
I love to far out in the country to get anything bigger then a 5/5mbit connection.
A larger ddos attack would block access to the Cisco VPS consentrator and customer support
That is why I dont have email or webtraffic go straight to the server.
The outlook webaccess aitn even hosted locally either. Its just the frontend on a remote server
When sending email from my Outlook or outlook-webaccess, it is send out by MX B (domain.local)
Its the cheapest and safest bang for the bucks, It can run everything safely here with just two Cisco pix 501 for the services, and one linksys for webtraffic.
Others have said it best, go with whatever the folks maintaining the server are most familiar with with. In the end, there isn't a lot of difference performance wise and such, if ran by competent sys-admins.
I prefer Linux, simply because I *know* linux. If anything happens on Linux, there is a good chance I can recovery/fix it. FreeBSD however, I only know the basics.
If ran by competent folks, you will have a good experience with either.
FreeBSD is my preferred choice. the ports system is pure bliss. its also true UNIX and I find there is much more consistant documentation. Some of the highest uptimes (3-4 yrs) are systems running BSD.
Comment