Errotica-archives - a bit over photoshoped - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

DVTimes

xxx

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 31650
Share

Post
#1

Errotica-archives - a bit over photoshoped

09-09-2009, 03:26 PM

i love the site, but the latest fhg seem too over photoshoped.

what do you think?

samples:

http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...185250/1794391
http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...235649/1794391
http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...713575/1794391
http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...818175/1794391
http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...722408/1794391

13 Voters

yes

0%

5 votes

no

0%

6 votes

do not care

0%

2 votes

XXX
Tags: None
Machete_

WINNING!

Join Date: Oct 2002

Posts: 14579
Share

Post
#2

09-09-2009, 03:28 PM

Originally posted by allanuk

i love the site, but the latest fhg seem too over photoshoped.

what do you think?

samples:

http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...185250/1794391
http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...235649/1794391
http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...713575/1794391
http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...818175/1794391
http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...722408/1794391

Not really

Females outside the UK just look that good
Comment
katharos

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Nov 2005

Posts: 1515
Share

Post
#3

09-09-2009, 03:30 PM

looks like met art people are finaly taking this site down with blured shit
Comment
rowan

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Mar 2002

Posts: 17393
Share

Post
#4

09-09-2009, 03:35 PM

I've always thought Erro's images looked a bit oversharpened.
Comment
harvey

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jul 2001

Posts: 9266
Share

Post
#5

09-09-2009, 03:38 PM

Originally posted by KrisH

Not really

Females outside the UK just look that good

btw, not too photoshopped, as a matter of fact it's on the lower side of nowadays ridiculous photoshopping. I've seen girls without nipples, without bellybutton, girls that look like was statues (just go to most TGP nowadays and you'll see it). This looks more like really good photography and some color correction and minor tweaking. In the first photo I saw you'd even see the net of veins in the girl's leg

http://hosted.errotica-archives.com/...d/185250/1.jpg

as we are at it: why is that there's not a single site with over-photoshopping that ever succeeded, yet people still continues doing it? It really amazes me

This post is endorsed by CIA, KGB, MI6, the Mafia, Illuminati, Kim Jong Il, Worldwide Ninjas Association, Klingon Empire and lolcats. Don't mess around with it, just accept it and embrace the truth
Comment
Boogie3

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 816
Share

Post
#6

09-09-2009, 03:43 PM

Great stuff, but yes, way over photoshopped.

How ya like my sig?
Comment
DVTimes

xxx

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 31650
Share

Post
#7

09-09-2009, 03:49 PM

i thought so.

top pics spoilt with silly photoshop.

XXX
Comment
GrouchyAdmin

Now choke yourself!

Join Date: Apr 2006

Posts: 12085
Share

Post
#8

09-09-2009, 03:50 PM

I, personally, won't stand for shit photoshopped like this!

I will, however, sit down and rub one out.

AIM: GrouchyGfy
Comment
DVTimes

xxx

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 31650
Share

Post
#9

09-09-2009, 06:24 PM

Originally posted by GrouchyAdmin

I, personally, won't stand for shit photoshopped like this!

I will, however, sit down and rub one out.

he he

me too

XXX
Comment
MaDalton

I am Amazing Content!

Join Date: Feb 2004

Posts: 39861
Share

Post
#10

09-09-2009, 06:45 PM

i just know they were paying shitty low money to the girls

AmazingContent.com - providing only the best content and service since 2003
Monetize your content on Veegaz.com - one of Germanies largest VOD sites
Got German traffic? We convert it into money for you!
Email: oltecconsult [at] gmail [dot] com
Comment
DonovanTrent

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2006

Posts: 968
Share

Post
#11

09-09-2009, 07:33 PM

Question is, do people sign up from it? If they do, it's not over-Photoshopped.

Donovan Trent
Comment
bronco67

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Dec 2006

Posts: 29026
Share

Post
#12

09-09-2009, 07:49 PM

Digital artist here ---

I don't think so at all. It's obvious they're photoshopped to me, because I know girls' skin just ain't that perfect -- but most people wouldn't think that. They'd buy it, because it's good, subtle photoshop work.

Overphotshopped is what the chick magazines do on their covers(Cosmo, bazaar, etc). They trim waistlines and make the skin look plastic.

Erotica-archives skin tones look right.
Comment
DVTimes

xxx

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 31650
Share

Post
#13

09-10-2009, 01:38 PM

to me they look almost cartoon like rather than real pics.

XXX
Comment
BestXXXPorn

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2009

Posts: 2277
Share

Post
#14

09-10-2009, 01:51 PM

Beauty is in the eye of the beholder... I mean, some people go for 3D porn and/or Anime... Do I find that a turn on, not at all... but some people do...

Errotica-Archives, to me, is about erotic nudes in exotic locales. Its goal isn't to appear realistic, leave that for reality sites. Instead I see the goal as fulfilling a fantasy and fantasy doesn't have to be realistic.

ICQ: 258-202-811 | Email: eric{at}bestxxxporn.com
Comment
BestXXXPorn

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2009

Posts: 2277
Share

Post
#15

09-10-2009, 01:55 PM

A more interesting question to me would be...

In today's adult entertainment world with reality and realism soooo popular, does Errotica-Archives miss out on attracting a large percentage of users because they veer so far away from the some of todays hottest niches?

However everything is cyclic, 80s fashion is coming back in right after retro 70s is fading out. 5 years from now the masses may have tired of the reality niche and may be swinging back into the fantasy realm in which case they'd be poised to dominate the market :P

ICQ: 258-202-811 | Email: eric{at}bestxxxporn.com
Comment
JayAllan

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jan 2008

Posts: 1148
Share

Post
#16

09-10-2009, 03:42 PM

It is way too over photoshopped. The people that chime in here saying it is fine and creates the fantasy etc are missing the point. A picture can be TOTALLY photoshopped and still have that amazing glamour appearance. Once it looks like a plastic doll it has gone way too far.

I shoot a lot of mainstream and we spend up to 10-12 hours on a single image all the time. But you can't tell by looking at it that is is retouched. All the detail is still there. you can even see pores. But it is very clean.

Here is a sample. Not the best pic in the world, but it illustrates my point ..
Comment
Lassitor

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2009

Posts: 278
Share

Post
#17

09-10-2009, 03:48 PM

I use photoshop for tat removal, if possible, and to smooth out skin blemishes or other unwanted artifacts. However, to enlarge breast, hips or whatever is when things get silly.
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...