My critique of Glorious Basterds

**Jman** · 09-10-2009, 10:27 AM

is that the sequal for inglorious basterds ;-)

**theking** · 09-10-2009, 10:31 AM

Originally posted by Jean-Francois

is that the sequal for inglorious basterds ;-)

I see what you are saying here. My mistake..."Inglorius Basterds".

**X37375787** · 09-10-2009, 10:32 AM

Originally posted by theking

"Inglorius Basterds".

You still managed to get it wrong.

**MaDalton** · 09-10-2009, 10:33 AM

i don't trust movie reviews where the reviewer can't even spell the title correctly

**ProG** · 09-10-2009, 10:35 AM

Maybe you should get a coloring book instead

**X37375787** · 09-10-2009, 10:36 AM

Originally posted by madalton

i don't trust movie reviews where the reviewer can't even spell the title correctly

+ 1

**theking** · 09-10-2009, 10:36 AM

Originally posted by Equinox

You still managed to get it wrong.

Well...fuck it. Still a bad movie.

**onwebcam** · 09-10-2009, 10:39 AM

This thread explains so much about you. That movie is/was a work of art. But it would take someone with at least half a brain to understand it.

**CaptainHowdy** · 09-10-2009, 10:43 AM

After 5 minutes of GRINDHOUSE'S "DEATH PROOF" I'm no longer willing to watch a Tarantino movie...

**Davy** · 09-10-2009, 11:05 AM

I found it at least as good as Pulp Fiction.
It actuallz had some dialogue!

**BobG** · 09-10-2009, 11:13 AM

I didn't hate it but I thought it was meh.

Comment