The End Of Illegal Tubes Starts HERE
Collapse
X
-
-
Not fully relevant, but still a good precedent. With some effort it can be extended to our area of interest (copyright infringements), as most of the arguments that convinced the court in LV case will still be valid..
.
FerroCash - 50+ quality niche paysites to promote | 100K+ FHGs | Check recently added galleries
New sites | Pantyhose | Nylon | Shemale | Strapon | Lesbian | Mature/MILF | Anal | Old&Young | Gay | Feet
Morphing RSS feeds - check them at the Official blog| Page Peels (Sample 1 : Sample 2)
Wish to review or evaluate our sites before promoting them? Contact me for free password.
ICQ: 38.89.22.76 e-mail: support AT ferrocash.comComment
-
You can?t extend it to copyright they are two spate things and that is why it is beneficial as they can?t claim safe harbor, once a host or advertiser is put on notice of the mark infringement or even if they merely should have know about the infringement they are liable from that point forward they can?t wait for the Tube owner to take it down.Comment
-
Yes I agree they're two separate things and this case is yet another "arrow", as was said in another thread, one more weapon to throw at the offending site in court.You can’t extend it to copyright they are two spate things and that is why it is beneficial as they can’t claim safe harbor, once a host or advertiser is put on notice of the mark infringement or even if they merely should have know about the infringement they are liable from that point forward they can’t wait for the Tube owner to take it down.
I didn't read the actual court case but from the magazine articles about it, it looks like DMCA and safe harbor were the part of the argument in court anyway. Don't know what was the exact reason for it, but it looks like the court found them connected in one way or the other.
Thus, if DMCA and safe harbor were parts of the reasoning anyway, that's what makes me think the decision can be extended into the copyright area. It will take one more legal battle, but having LV precedent behind you, a precedent that is portrayed as the one setting the limits of the safe harbor defense, will surely help.
Going after the trademark infringement is good, but not THAT good. For example, our older videos were not watermarked and they're still flying around at tubes and torrents, and we'll still need copyright laws and precedents if we're going to fight the offenders in court..
.
FerroCash - 50+ quality niche paysites to promote | 100K+ FHGs | Check recently added galleries
New sites | Pantyhose | Nylon | Shemale | Strapon | Lesbian | Mature/MILF | Anal | Old&Young | Gay | Feet
Morphing RSS feeds - check them at the Official blog| Page Peels (Sample 1 : Sample 2)
Wish to review or evaluate our sites before promoting them? Contact me for free password.
ICQ: 38.89.22.76 e-mail: support AT ferrocash.comComment
-
As it has been explained to me, by one of the best attorneys in LA, that if you are seeking protection under the DMCA by the letter of the law -- the tubes should leave the gates wide open and allow every video that comes through to go up on the site. It just basically says, "people just submit content up here, if someone wants it removed, we will remove it in reasonable time."i think you are misunderstanding what happened.
the guy set up the ISPs specifically for the purpose of running these sites. he wasn't acting as an hosting company dealing with hosting clients... and as a result, he didn't meet the legal requirements for safe harbor protection. i don't see how this applies to any real hosting company or tube sites.
If an ISP is even NOT ALLOWING certain submissions to go straight up on the front page, then they are actually controlling what is going up there and the DMCA does not apply.
If the DMCA doesn't apply at this point, these weasels have left themselves open for all kinds of problems.Last edited by xxxjay; 09-05-2009, 11:32 AM.Comment
-
youtube exercises editorial judgment all day every day over their uploads and it does not nullify their safe harbor provisions.
As it has been explained to me, by one of the best attorneys in LA, that if you are seeking protection under the DMCA by the letter of the law -- the tubes should leave the gates wide open and allow every video that comes through to go up on the site. It just basically says, "people just submit content up here, if someone wants it removed, we will remove it in reasonable time."
If an ISP is even NOT ALLOWING certain submissions to go straight up on the front page, then they are actually controlling what is going up there and the DMCA does not apply.
If the DMCA doesn't apply at this point, these weasels have left themselves open for all kinds of problems.Comment
-
You sure hang with a lot of criminals and shady individuals.I knew a few people involved with knock off goods in Cali/LA, BIG BUSINESS, Louis Vutton is small percentage of whats actually happening in california. Knock off business stretches around entire world and runs seemingly without interuption. From Obama shirts in London to knock off Vutton in LA.Comment
-
What good is talking to all of these good lawyers if you're still doing nothing? You could save money by only talking about it on gfy.As it has been explained to me, by one of the best attorneys in LA, that if you are seeking protection under the DMCA by the letter of the law -- the tubes should leave the gates wide open and allow every video that comes through to go up on the site. It just basically says, "people just submit content up here, if someone wants it removed, we will remove it in reasonable time.".
I remember you used to have pictures with your tongue hanging out with a thumbs up about to do a line of blow off of a whore's stomach....Now even your avatar looks sad and defeated.....WTF?Comment
-
this just sounds right...............As it has been explained to me, by one of the best attorneys in LA, that if you are seeking protection under the DMCA by the letter of the law -- the tubes should leave the gates wide open and allow every video that comes through to go up on the site. It just basically says, "people just submit content up here, if someone wants it removed, we will remove it in reasonable time."
If an ISP is even NOT ALLOWING certain submissions to go straight up on the front page, then they are actually controlling what is going up there and the DMCA does not apply.
If the DMCA doesn't apply at this point, these weasels have left themselves open for all kinds of problems.This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!
Now read without the word dog.Comment
-
he just got outa the hospital - give him a little time.........What good is talking to all of these good lawyers if you're still doing nothing? You could save money by only talking about it on gfy.
I remember you used to have pictures with your tongue hanging out with a thumbs up about to do a line of blow off of a whore's stomach....Now even your avatar looks sad and defeated.....WTF?This dog, is dog, a dog, good dog, way dog, to dog, keep dog, an dog, idiot dog, busy dog, for dog, 20 dog, seconds dog!
Now read without the word dog.Comment
-
thailand/laos/cambodia are extremely bad for this. they are selling 'armani' suits on every street corner lol. and i have seen several completely fake bmw's from china. i shit you not.I knew a few people involved with knock off goods in Cali/LA, BIG BUSINESS, Louis Vutton is small percentage of whats actually happening in california. Knock off business stretches around entire world and runs seemingly without interuption. From Obama shirts in London to knock off Vutton in LA.
music too. load up your ipod, 20 gigs of music for 30 baht (less than a dollar). and it is everywhere. or if you are old school, you can buy 3 (sometimes 5) cds for around a buck. it's pretty crazy.we'll miss you our friend. RIPComment
-
so they should allow cp to be uploaded too, and supporting that illegal activity is the only way that they can be protected by safe harbor.As it has been explained to me, by one of the best attorneys in LA, that if you are seeking protection under the DMCA by the letter of the law -- the tubes should leave the gates wide open and allow every video that comes through to go up on the site. It just basically says, "people just submit content up here, if someone wants it removed, we will remove it in reasonable time."
If an ISP is even NOT ALLOWING certain submissions to go straight up on the front page, then they are actually controlling what is going up there and the DMCA does not apply.
If the DMCA doesn't apply at this point, these weasels have left themselves open for all kinds of problems.
There is no way "best lawyer" in la told you that.
while there are limits on what you can do to block access (partner accounts ala tgp would cause problems, because of the direct financial benefit) editorial control is not an automagic invalidation of Safe harbor.
You could restrict content via your terms of service, not only to prevent things like cp and beastiality but by niche etc.
You could even exclude all porn as youtube does.Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
Very good news! But who know how long it will take till the major illegal tubs will be ass-fired...I had a meeting with an industry lawyer today. An ISP got slapped for $32M for DMCA violation. It should be interesting to see how the spills into tubes.
$32M Louis Vuitton judgment shows limits of ISP safe harbors
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/n...fe-harbors.arsObey the CowgodComment
-
No no, this below sound right.
so they should allow cp to be uploaded too, and supporting that illegal activity is the only way that they can be protected by safe harbor.
There is no way "best lawyer" in la told you that.
while there are limits on what you can do to block access (partner accounts ala tgp would cause problems, because of the direct financial benefit) editorial control is not an automagic invalidation of Safe harbor.
You could restrict content via your terms of service, not only to prevent things like cp and beastiality but by niche etc.
You could even exclude all porn as youtube does.
WE ARE BUYING PAY SITES! CONTACT ME
ClubSweethearts | ManUpFilms | SinfulXXX | HOT * AdultPrime * HOT
Paying webmasters since 1996! Contact: r.riepen @ sansylgroup.com | telegram: roaldr
Comment
-
And the ads they sell have no "direct financial benefit"?so they should allow cp to be uploaded too, and supporting that illegal activity is the only way that they can be protected by safe harbor.
There is no way "best lawyer" in la told you that.
while there are limits on what you can do to block access (partner accounts ala tgp would cause problems, because of the direct financial benefit) editorial control is not an automagic invalidation of Safe harbor.
You could restrict content via your terms of service, not only to prevent things like cp and beastiality but by niche etc.
You could even exclude all porn as youtube does.Comment
-
Sadly this is what happens in countries where copyright is not respected.thailand/laos/cambodia are extremely bad for this. they are selling 'armani' suits on every street corner lol. and i have seen several completely fake bmw's from china. i shit you not.
music too. load up your ipod, 20 gigs of music for 30 baht (less than a dollar). and it is everywhere. or if you are old school, you can buy 3 (sometimes 5) cds for around a buck. it's pretty crazy.
I remember renting videos (back in the VHS days) in a regular video rental store in the Bahamas where every single video was an illegal copy and they had everything! Completely blatant with Avery labels on the tapes.
Dirty D - ICQ #1326843 - $1 Million Dollars of Bonus Money - 8,000+ FHG!
Glory Hole Girlz - Crack Whore Confessions - Tampa Bukkake - Slut Wife Training - Fuck a Fan
Electricity Play - Porn Video Drive - Theater Sluts - Skunk Riley - Ukraine Amateurs - Strapon SessionsComment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!Comment
-
Comment
-
I wonder where's more chances to prevail in court, in sueing tubes themselves or their ISPs?
Sueing ISPs is a better route if we aim at reducing the amount of thieves out there, because ISPs are the bottleneck, if no ISP is willing to host the illegal tube = no illegal tubes. But I'm not sure which one is easier to win in court..
.
FerroCash - 50+ quality niche paysites to promote | 100K+ FHGs | Check recently added galleries
New sites | Pantyhose | Nylon | Shemale | Strapon | Lesbian | Mature/MILF | Anal | Old&Young | Gay | Feet
Morphing RSS feeds - check them at the Official blog| Page Peels (Sample 1 : Sample 2)
Wish to review or evaluate our sites before promoting them? Contact me for free password.
ICQ: 38.89.22.76 e-mail: support AT ferrocash.comComment
-
Sounds like a cracked out witch hunt to me, everyone settle down, next week some conspiracy to sue their grandmother will come up, come on guys, jay says he has the best lawyer of the land, and the best they got is to use this, jay needs to go back to that lawyer and say are you fucking kidding me, either way good luck with the huntComment
-
Illegal tubes suck.
That is the extent of my contribution to this topic.
Honest adult reviews? - Adult Reviews
Ethnic paysite owners? - Get reviewed
Follow me? - Twitter PornComment
-
Happy Birthday, Jay
$9.95/month for 15000 GB bandwidth monthly, unlimited (sub)domains and MySQL5, PHP4/5, 500 GB disk storage!
; use any of these invitation codes: 216263692101; 408636009193; 846090586647; my ICQ 30160426!Comment






Comment