Police have near-live satellite views of City

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • xenigo
    Confirmed User
    • Jan 2001
    • 8067

    #1

    Police have near-live satellite views of City

    My brother's wife was applying for a police dispatcher position in the City of Rocklin this week, and did a 'ride-along' with someone there. She said they have a wall that consists of a satellite surveillance screen that refreshes every 4 minutes. They can key in your address and look at the cars parked in front of your house, see anyone in the area, etc.

    This is scary shit IMO.

    The possibilities of it's unscrupulous use are endless.
  • SBJ
    So Fucking Fabulous
    • Apr 2003
    • 11377

    #2
    Enemy of the state.. right there

    Comment

    • dav3
      Confirmed User
      • May 2007
      • 7348

      #3
      Webmasters :: Juicy Ads :: ACWM :: Crak Revenue :: Money Tree

      Comment

      • xenigo
        Confirmed User
        • Jan 2001
        • 8067

        #4
        Originally posted by dav3
        Cause everyone has a bush parked in their driveway...

        Comment

        • Machete_
          WINNING!
          • Oct 2002
          • 14579

          #5
          It's not satellite images if its updated avery 4 minutes. Its images gathered by the police and news choppers that fly over the area

          Low Earth orbit satellites used to take those images, only pass over a given spot on the ground once every few days

          Comment

          • xenigo
            Confirmed User
            • Jan 2001
            • 8067

            #6
            Originally posted by KrisH
            It's not satellite images if its updated avery 4 minutes. Its images gathered by the police and news choppers that fly over the area

            Low Earth orbit satellites used to take those images, only pass over a given spot on the ground once every few days
            It is definitely satellite images, and it is definitely every 4 minutes. And it's definitely scary shit.

            I used to live in Rocklin and there is not a helicopter flying 24/7. That would be an incredible nuisance, and an even bigger waste of taxpayer dollars.

            Comment

            • Machete_
              WINNING!
              • Oct 2002
              • 14579

              #7
              Originally posted by xenigo
              It is definitely satellite images, and it is definitely every 4 minutes. And it's definitely scary shit.

              I used to live in Rocklin and there is not a helicopter flying 24/7. That would be an incredible nuisance, and an even bigger waste of taxpayer dollars.
              I dont belive you(your brother's wife). geostationary satellite images dont have that kind of resolution and I do think a 50+ community can afford one even if it had.

              Comment

              • xenigo
                Confirmed User
                • Jan 2001
                • 8067

                #8
                Originally posted by KrisH
                I dont belive you(your brother's wife). geostationary satellite images dont have that kind of resolution and I do think a 50+ community can afford one even if it had.
                It's not a 50+ community. It's a city, dude. Population 53,000.

                Comment

                • just a punk
                  So fuckin' bored
                  • Jun 2003
                  • 32385

                  #9
                  Originally posted by xenigo
                  My brother's wife was applying for a police dispatcher position in the City of Rocklin this week, and did a 'ride-along' with someone there. She said they have a wall that consists of a satellite surveillance screen that refreshes every 4 minutes. They can key in your address and look at the cars parked in front of your house, see anyone in the area, etc.

                  This is scary shit IMO.

                  The possibilities of it's unscrupulous use are endless.
                  Welcome to the pitch dark and gloomy world of CYBER PUNK. The future was much closer than most of us were thinking before...
                  Obey the Cowgod

                  Comment

                  • just a punk
                    So fuckin' bored
                    • Jun 2003
                    • 32385

                    #10
                    Originally posted by KrisH
                    I dont belive you(your brother's wife). geostationary satellite images dont have that kind of resolution and I do think a 50+ community can afford one even if it had.
                    Actually they have. Enjoy the specs for the begging at this century: http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2001/...lleLouis.shtml
                    Obey the Cowgod

                    Comment

                    • Machete_
                      WINNING!
                      • Oct 2002
                      • 14579

                      #11
                      Originally posted by xenigo
                      It's not a 50+ community. It's a city, dude. Population 53,000.
                      50+ as in 50k

                      Comment

                      • dav3
                        Confirmed User
                        • May 2007
                        • 7348

                        #12
                        Originally posted by xenigo
                        Cause everyone has a bush parked in their driveway...
                        dont they have yards where you live? i mean fuck, if you are going to camo net your car, you might as well park in the fucking yard too.
                        Webmasters :: Juicy Ads :: ACWM :: Crak Revenue :: Money Tree

                        Comment

                        • xenigo
                          Confirmed User
                          • Jan 2001
                          • 8067

                          #13
                          Originally posted by dav3
                          dont they have yards where you live? i mean fuck, if you are going to camo net your car, you might as well park in the fucking yard too.
                          I think the garage tends to work better.

                          Comment

                          • Machete_
                            WINNING!
                            • Oct 2002
                            • 14579

                            #14
                            Originally posted by cyberxxx
                            Actually they have. Enjoy the specs for the begging at this century: http://hypertextbook.com/facts/2001/...lleLouis.shtml
                            none of those are geostationary satellites you idiot. It's impossible to have orbiting satellites flying over your head every 4 minutes.

                            Comment

                            • dav3
                              Confirmed User
                              • May 2007
                              • 7348

                              #15
                              lol k, too much discussion over something that was supposed to make you crack a smile, not make your butt hurt.
                              Webmasters :: Juicy Ads :: ACWM :: Crak Revenue :: Money Tree

                              Comment

                              • xenigo
                                Confirmed User
                                • Jan 2001
                                • 8067

                                #16
                                Originally posted by KrisH
                                none of those are geostationary satellites you idiot. It's impossible to have orbiting satellites flying over your head every 4 minutes.
                                Apparently they demo'd it to her by asking what her Rocklin address was. They typed it in, saw the image, and said "looks like nobody's home". The technology is apparently very, very advanced. Much more so than I had imagined before this evening.

                                Comment

                                • xenigo
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Jan 2001
                                  • 8067

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by dav3
                                  lol k, too much discussion over something that was supposed to make you crack a smile, not make your butt hurt.
                                  I swear I didn't sense the sarcasm... if it was more sarcasmic, perhaps I would have picked up on the driveway / bush / car joke...

                                  Comment

                                  • just a punk
                                    So fuckin' bored
                                    • Jun 2003
                                    • 32385

                                    #18
                                    Originally posted by KrisH
                                    none of those are geostationary satellites you idiot. It's impossible to have orbiting satellites flying over your head every 4 minutes.
                                    The modern geostationary spy satellites have effective optical resolution of 1 meter (IGS-1a etc). This is an official info, but there is also a secret part of info which is unavailable for everyone. I won't be surprised if there are GEO spy satellites with an optical resolution as low as 50 centimeters and even less.
                                    Obey the Cowgod

                                    Comment

                                    • Machete_
                                      WINNING!
                                      • Oct 2002
                                      • 14579

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by cyberxxx
                                      The modern geostationary spy satellites have effective optical resolution of 1 meter (IGS-1a etc). This is an official info, but there is also a secret part of info which is unavailable for everyone. I won't be surprised if there are GEO spy satellites with an optical resolution as low as 50 centimeters and even less.
                                      IGS-1a is NOT geostationary, they are orbiting god damn it!

                                      For that 50k community to have a quasilive image feed from a satellite every 4 minute, they need something like 25 satellite in orbit exclusive passing over their head. Every person in that community needs to be billionairs to be able to afford that kind of service.

                                      I'm not saying they dont have the images - all im saying is, its not satellite based.
                                      Last edited by Machete_; 07-26-2009, 04:46 AM.

                                      Comment

                                      • Doug E
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • Sep 2005
                                        • 511

                                        #20
                                        IGS-1a is NOT geostationary, they are orbiting god damn it!

                                        For that 50k community to have a quasilive image feed from a satellite every 4 minute, they need something like 25 satellite in orbit exclusive passing over their head. Every person in that community needs to be billionairs to be able to afford that kind of service.

                                        I'm not saying they dont have the images - all im saying is, its not satellite based.


                                        And it all comes down to basic math and common sense, both basically uncommon.

                                        Comment

                                        • just a punk
                                          So fuckin' bored
                                          • Jun 2003
                                          • 32385

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by KrisH
                                          IGS-1a is NOT geostationary, they are orbiting god damn it!
                                          Yes, I got wrong info on IGS-1. BTW, what is an effective optical resolution of USA-171 for example?
                                          Obey the Cowgod

                                          Comment

                                          • just a punk
                                            So fuckin' bored
                                            • Jun 2003
                                            • 32385

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by Doug E


                                            And it all comes down to basic math and common sense, both basically uncommon.
                                            How exactly the information on optical resolution of GEO spy satellites correlates with basic math and common sense? What shit are you smoking man?
                                            Obey the Cowgod

                                            Comment

                                            • Gerco
                                              Confirmed User
                                              • Nov 2005
                                              • 2052

                                              #23
                                              Does anyone in here really believe we know what the hell is up there and what it can really do? Maybe in ten years we will know what can be done today, by then it will have become so obsolete that the information will surface.
                                              Http://www.extremehole.com

                                              **** CLOSED ****

                                              400 HOURS of exclusive custom extreme content, already on external HD in Raw DV ready to encode.
                                              over 150,000 exclusive images and more.

                                              Comment

                                              • just a punk
                                                So fuckin' bored
                                                • Jun 2003
                                                • 32385

                                                #24
                                                Originally posted by Gerco
                                                Does anyone in here really believe we know what the hell is up there and what it can really do?
                                                Exactly. Almost all the REAL information is secret. That's why I asked about USA-171 because nobody here knows the actual (non-fake) specs.

                                                P.S. As about USA-171, so at least we know it's really exists, but I doubt we know about ALL military satellites that were launched by various countries.
                                                Obey the Cowgod

                                                Comment

                                                • Machete_
                                                  WINNING!
                                                  • Oct 2002
                                                  • 14579

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by cyberxxx
                                                  Yes, I got wrong info on IGS-1. BTW, what is an effective optical resolution of USA-171 for example?
                                                  I would say ZERO since its a sattelite that is build to pick up radio and other electronic signals. Or did you think they managed to throw a huge cam in it as well?

                                                  for satellite images where you can see stuff on the ground, you need Low Earth orbit satellites.

                                                  You use geostationary positioned further out in space when you want to measure radiosignals, weather, heat ect ect ect. But optical cameras NEED to be low Earth orbiting

                                                  Comment

                                                  • just a punk
                                                    So fuckin' bored
                                                    • Jun 2003
                                                    • 32385

                                                    #26
                                                    BTW, as you may remember, the US government has denied the existence of ECHELON. There is always a big difference between what the government says and what it actually has.
                                                    Obey the Cowgod

                                                    Comment

                                                    • Machete_
                                                      WINNING!
                                                      • Oct 2002
                                                      • 14579

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by cyberxxx
                                                      BTW, as you may remember, the US government has denied the existence of ECHELON. There is always a big difference between what the government says and what it actually has.
                                                      wtf does that have to do with the physical impossibilities if a 50k community having a geostationary positioned satellite hovering over their head?

                                                      Comment

                                                      • just a punk
                                                        So fuckin' bored
                                                        • Jun 2003
                                                        • 32385

                                                        #28
                                                        Originally posted by KrisH
                                                        Or did you think they managed to throw a huge cam in it as well?
                                                        As I said above, I don't really know what exactly equipment they have on this (as well as on other) satellites. Should I rely upon the publicly available info?
                                                        Obey the Cowgod

                                                        Comment

                                                        • sortie
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Mar 2007
                                                          • 7771

                                                          #29
                                                          The government still doesn't spy on you as much as your neighbors do.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • Machete_
                                                            WINNING!
                                                            • Oct 2002
                                                            • 14579

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by cyberxxx
                                                            Should I rely upon the publicly available info?
                                                            No, you should rely on scientific FACTS and simple math


                                                            I give up .. you obviously rather belive you sifi-tinhat-hollywood story. It's as pointless as debating religion with religious people
                                                            Last edited by Machete_; 07-26-2009, 05:40 AM.

                                                            Comment

                                                            • just a punk
                                                              So fuckin' bored
                                                              • Jun 2003
                                                              • 32385

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by KrisH
                                                              wtf does that have to do with the physical impossibilities if a 50k community having a geostationary positioned satellite hovering over their head?
                                                              Nothing. Actually yes, I believe I have moved a bit offtopic there. Course all these secret military systems are 100% unavailable there.
                                                              Obey the Cowgod

                                                              Comment

                                                              • Dirty Dane
                                                                Sick Fuck
                                                                • Feb 2004
                                                                • 9491

                                                                #32
                                                                That is nothing compared to what military do, and have been doing for years. I could tell all about some cool stuff, but then they had to shoot me.

                                                                Comment

                                                                • Doug E
                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                  • Sep 2005
                                                                  • 511

                                                                  #33
                                                                  Originally posted by cyberxxx
                                                                  How exactly the information on optical resolution of GEO spy satellites correlates with basic math and common sense? What shit are you smoking man?
                                                                  For some reason I'm reminded of a line of dialogue from some movie that went roughly "NASA spent millions developing a pen that could write in space. The Russians, they used a pencil."

                                                                  The common sense to know that a satellite costs a lot of money and the basic math to understand that a lot of money spent surveilling a town of butt-fuck proportions is not worth the expenditure. But what do I know, it could very well be some piggy back experiment on a scientific satellite used to monitor the decline in numbers of the endangered WuWu bird of Rocklin and its correlation to global warming. And as I don't have much past basic math and common sense I'm not capable of figuring out the possibility of that.

                                                                  In all my ignorance and lack of wisdom I am also overly sure that if the Rocklin police department has access to a super secret spy satellite the capabilities of their surveillance program would not be allowed to be openly spoken about by every badge to every job applicant.

                                                                  But for real, I got no idea. This thread just cracked me up enough that I had to post, be I the dumb or the not

                                                                  ( And for super real, my own town in butt-fuck nowhere just got an F-22 to chase speeders down the highway that goes past. )

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • EscortBiz
                                                                    Fuck Checks, CASH only!
                                                                    • May 2002
                                                                    • 19422

                                                                    #34
                                                                    total bullshit A-Z

                                                                    Spanking, Medical Fetish, Sleeping, Strap-on Anal Lesbians, Girls Fucking Guys, Handjob site REAL HOT, Shemales, Anal and Ass Licking sites 100% Real EXCLUSIVE with amazing retention, ccbill payouts, lots of content FREE FTP HOSTING

                                                                    Promote the largest and oldest member paid escort site, Converts 10 times better then any dating site, CCBill payouts

                                                                    ICQ# 158802076

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • SmokeyTheBear
                                                                      ►SouthOfHeaven
                                                                      • Jun 2004
                                                                      • 28609

                                                                      #35
                                                                      i think they were just playing a joke on your brothers wife. It would cost unheard of amounts of $$$ to accomplish this feat, besides the technical impossibility.
                                                                      hatisblack at yahoo.com

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • Machete_
                                                                        WINNING!
                                                                        • Oct 2002
                                                                        • 14579

                                                                        #36
                                                                        ok - I did a little research while cooking dinner

                                                                        http://www.rocklin.ca.gov/government...tch__9_1_1.asp

                                                                        its that map she saw. its a satellite image, but its not updated every 4 minutes. That map is used to embed the calls and locations in to the map, so they can get a live view of the calls (not the map, but the CALLS)

                                                                        The only thing that updates every 4 minutes is the GPS location of the police staff

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • Angry Jew Cat - Banned for Life
                                                                          (felis madjewicus)
                                                                          • Jul 2006
                                                                          • 20368

                                                                          #37
                                                                          You took this word from a woman? They were probably refreshing Google Earth!

                                                                          I LOL atball the GFY aerospace engineers and their advanced knowledge of spy satellites. I have no doubt that there are some pretty advanced fucking satellites way out there, that could probably read the newspaper with you. The government has got all sorts of fucked up technologies that no common man seems to know about until 50 years after its been in use.

                                                                          That being said though, I do have to agree, the idea that a city of 50,000 is using this sort technology in their local PD is fucking ridiculous...

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • Pleasurepays
                                                                            BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES
                                                                            • Aug 2002
                                                                            • 11913

                                                                            #38
                                                                            its not possible.

                                                                            its not even debatable.

                                                                            gfy is getting dumber and dumber by the minute

                                                                            may god help us all

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • San
                                                                              So Fucking Banned
                                                                              • Jan 2004
                                                                              • 790

                                                                              #39
                                                                              Originally posted by dav3
                                                                              Awesome!

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • San
                                                                                So Fucking Banned
                                                                                • Jan 2004
                                                                                • 790

                                                                                #40
                                                                                Originally posted by Pleasurepays
                                                                                its not possible.
                                                                                I guess you haven't watched 24

                                                                                They had sattelites 'n shit able to survey any area in the world.

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • fatfoo
                                                                                  ICQ:649699063
                                                                                  • Mar 2003
                                                                                  • 27763

                                                                                  #41
                                                                                  Yeah, they can do that...
                                                                                  Send me an email: [email protected]

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • seeandsee
                                                                                    Check SIG!
                                                                                    • Mar 2006
                                                                                    • 50945

                                                                                    #42
                                                                                    i see you, haha
                                                                                    BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year

                                                                                    Contact here

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • dynastoned
                                                                                      mmm yeah!
                                                                                      • Feb 2005
                                                                                      • 5061

                                                                                      #43
                                                                                      lolol @ rocklin pd

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • ModelPerfect
                                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                                        • Nov 2003
                                                                                        • 2862

                                                                                        #44
                                                                                        Aren't geostationary satellites only achieved over the equator?
                                                                                        Logan
                                                                                        modelperfect [at] gmail.com
                                                                                        http://www.modelperfect.com

                                                                                        (Proudly hosted at www.webair.com )

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • Machete_
                                                                                          WINNING!
                                                                                          • Oct 2002
                                                                                          • 14579

                                                                                          #45
                                                                                          Originally posted by ModelPerfect
                                                                                          Aren't geostationary satellites only achieved over the equator?
                                                                                          that is the correct gramatical meaning of the word, but most people usually use the word for satellites that stay the same in the same spot compared to the ground below. Other people call it Geosynchronous orbit wich is the correct term. But mostly its the same thing people reffer to
                                                                                          Last edited by Machete_; 07-26-2009, 09:41 AM.

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • ModelPerfect
                                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                                            • Nov 2003
                                                                                            • 2862

                                                                                            #46
                                                                                            Originally posted by KrisH
                                                                                            that is the correct gramatical meaning of the word, but most people usually use the word for satellites that stay the same in the same spot compared to the ground below. Other people call it Geosynchronous orbit wich is the correct term. But mostly its the same thing people reffer to
                                                                                            I understand the vernacular distinction, but I thought this could only be achieved along the equator. Upon a little research, it appears that's not an accurate understanding. Apparently, a geosynchronous satellite can be relatively stationary even away from the equator, but will appear to oscillate around a fixed point. Only at the equator will it actually be geostationary, which was my original allusion.
                                                                                            Logan
                                                                                            modelperfect [at] gmail.com
                                                                                            http://www.modelperfect.com

                                                                                            (Proudly hosted at www.webair.com )

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • Machete_
                                                                                              WINNING!
                                                                                              • Oct 2002
                                                                                              • 14579

                                                                                              #47
                                                                                              Originally posted by ModelPerfect
                                                                                              I understand the vernacular distinction, but I thought this could only be achieved along the equator. Upon a little research, it appears that's not an accurate understanding. Apparently, a geosynchronous satellite can be relatively stationary even away from the equator, but will appear to oscillate around a fixed point. Only at the equator will it actually be geostationary, which was my original allusion.
                                                                                              All i know is what the different types of satellites are and what they are used for. That and the fact the earth is actually a little pearshaped. And I only know it because I worked with the danish company that fused the flyover images with googles sattelite images.

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • WiredGuy
                                                                                                Pounding Googlebot
                                                                                                • Aug 2002
                                                                                                • 34515

                                                                                                #48
                                                                                                Originally posted by dav3
                                                                                                If i owned that car, I'd want to hide it too.
                                                                                                WG
                                                                                                I play with Google.

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • 2MuchMark
                                                                                                  Mark of 2Much.net
                                                                                                  • Aug 2004
                                                                                                  • 50998

                                                                                                  #49
                                                                                                  Sigh...

                                                                                                  Satelites in geostationary orbit are always in the same point in space relative to a position on the earth. They are directly above the earth's equator, 22,236 miles up. Even though some have high res cameras, they aren't good enough to view streets and details. Instead they are used mostly for weather.
                                                                                                  Last edited by 2MuchMark; 07-26-2009, 11:21 AM.

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • PPC
                                                                                                    Registered User
                                                                                                    • Jun 2007
                                                                                                    • 60

                                                                                                    #50

                                                                                                    bruno wants to put 2 satellites in orbit around Uranus
                                                                                                    Pay Per Click

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    Working...