-
-
spAmacontent, your stuff is also sprinkled throughout youjizz.com as well. Heads up.
Hopefully you have better luck fighting tubes than you did fighting Sobegirl, who's claim to fame was his dodge neon. I doubt the owner of KeezMovies drives a Neon, know what I mean? $$$$
Good luck to ya!
Comment
-
a no watermark rule is just as arbitritary as youtube's no nudity rule.
If youtube is allowed to make an arbitrary rule and keep DMCA safe harbor protection
so can any porntube site.
it really depends on the guidelinesthey would be saying, well, you're not paying for the right to display your own content, so no game, but the other users are then all paying for the right to display content? and if that was the case, what safegaurds are then in place to make sure those paying customers aren't copyright infringing? and what info is collected? what info can be then shared with the original copyright holder?
seems to whichever way you cut it, this instance cannot be compared to Youtube, b/c Youtube basically said, we have millions of uploaders that upload, and we don't pre-approve them, but we filter for one set of things ( nudity based ) and therefore can only work in a reactive method to take down your content.
i'm sure there is a finite amount of users that upload stolen content on their own, b/c the activity is demonstrated in forums, and that is ok. but you cannot say that these tubes can have it both ways.
you can't force someone to pay to be listed without guidelines, and once you have those guidelines, they have to be enforeced the whole way down or you should be open for suit.
turning a blind eye for those that follow one behavior ( un watermarked, re watermarked, full length videos ) and denying other behavior ( watermarked, shorter movies ) won't work. that just demonstrates a pre-meditated business plan that won't follow any safe harbors.
I don't think porntubes could prove they have any of these things in place, and therefore, dmca would only go so far ....
they would have to be uniform, but a guideline based on watermarking
robbie mentioned that the watermarked it enough that it was impossible for it to be zoomed out
that would represent a level that would be potentially very intrusive
that would cause the tube site to lose repeat viewership.
personally this model is stupid, charging for the right to upload is counter productive to the user generated content
selling views, is a much better solution
let people upload as much as they want and set up account system that allows them to buy views from the related video bar below videos
spiking your traffic views to get honors (most viewed, etc)
the problem is that these tube guys are tgp guys not seo guys running them
they don't realize the massive value that the keywords have on their site.
“When crimes occur through the mail, you don’t shut the post office down,” Steve WozniakComment
-
much appreciatedspAmacontent, your stuff is also sprinkled throughout youjizz.com as well. Heads up.
Hopefully you have better luck fighting tubes than you did fighting Sobegirl, who's claim to fame was his dodge neon. I doubt the owner of KeezMovies drives a Neon, know what I mean? $$$$
Good luck to ya!Comment
Comment