Simple Math Eludes AIM - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

mikesouth

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 6340
Share

Post
#1

Simple Math Eludes AIM

06-12-2009, 06:48 PM

OK AIM has stated that everyone who worked with ?patient X? as they call her, since June 6 is quarantined for 2 14 week periods.

Patient X last tested on or around April 29, 2009

patient X could have been HIV positive but within the window period at that time

Meaning that first hand exposures have to go all the way back to the test BEFORE the April 29th test.

This is NOT being done.

Its a good thing that HIV is so hard to transmit, because if it weren?t porn would have been wiped out an awful long time ago.

Mike South

It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.
Tags: None
Helix

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2002

Posts: 6021
Share

Post
#2

06-12-2009, 07:22 PM

Originally posted by mikesouth

OK AIM has stated that everyone who worked with ?patient X? as they call her, since June 6 is quarantined for 2 14 week periods.

Patient X last tested on or around April 29, 2009

patient X could have been HIV positive but within the window period at that time

Meaning that first hand exposures have to go all the way back to the test BEFORE the April 29th test.

This is NOT being done.

Its a good thing that HIV is so hard to transmit, because if it weren?t porn would have been wiped out an awful long time ago.

Yes....you would think that a business that is built on the exchange of bodily fluids would be on top of this. Amazing stupidity to say the least.
Comment
Tempest

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: May 2004

Posts: 10217
Share

Post
#3

06-12-2009, 08:32 PM

Originally posted by mikesouth

OK AIM has stated that everyone who worked with “patient X” as they call her, since June 6 is quarantined for 2 14 week periods.

Patient X last tested on or around April 29, 2009

patient X could have been HIV positive but within the window period at that time

Meaning that first hand exposures have to go all the way back to the test BEFORE the April 29th test.

This is NOT being done.

Its a good thing that HIV is so hard to transmit, because if it weren’t porn would have been wiped out an awful long time ago.

Good point.. Especially since she got it somewhere in that period and no one knows who that original carrier might be.
Comment
xxxdesign-net

My hips don't lie

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 10129
Share

Post
#4

06-12-2009, 09:00 PM

2 + 2 = 5 no? Indeed the date of her last test were she tested negative should be the starting point for identifying who's going to get quarantined ...
Comment
xxxdesign-net

My hips don't lie

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 10129
Share

Post
#5

06-12-2009, 10:18 PM

Btw it says here, http://www.xbiz.com/news/109218 , that the last negative test was on the 29th... and the last test was done on june 4th.. Did they change their story?
Comment
CyberHustler

Masterbaiter

Join Date: Feb 2006

Posts: 28785
Share

Post
#6

06-12-2009, 10:23 PM

“If you can convince the lowest white man he’s better than the best colored man, he won’t notice you’re picking his pocket. Hell, give him somebody to look down on, and he’ll empty his pockets for you.”
Comment
NaughtyRob

Two fresh affiliate progs

Join Date: Nov 2004

Posts: 29602
Share

Post
#7

06-12-2009, 10:33 PM

WOW, very good point.

Originally posted by mikesouth

OK AIM has stated that everyone who worked with ?patient X? as they call her, since June 6 is quarantined for 2 14 week periods.

Patient X last tested on or around April 29, 2009

patient X could have been HIV positive but within the window period at that time

Meaning that first hand exposures have to go all the way back to the test BEFORE the April 29th test.

This is NOT being done.

Its a good thing that HIV is so hard to transmit, because if it weren?t porn would have been wiped out an awful long time ago.

[email protected]
Skype: 17026955414
Vacares Web Hosting - Protect Your Ass with Included Daily Backups
Comment
xxxdesign-net

My hips don't lie

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 10129
Share

Post
#8

06-12-2009, 10:57 PM

or do you mean that her last negative test was on may 29th and since tests are only effective 10-14(?) days after the infection, people she slept with after say may 15th should all be quarantined?
Comment
Tempest

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: May 2004

Posts: 10217
Share

Post
#9

06-13-2009, 12:17 AM

Originally posted by xxxdesign-net

or do you mean that her last negative test was on may 29th and since tests are only effective 10-14(?) days after the infection, people she slept with after say may 15th should all be quarantined?

Tested negative April 29th... So I guess they need to go back to April 14th and work forward from there.. Lovely.. Just Lovely...
Comment
mikesouth

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 6340
Share

Post
#10

06-13-2009, 12:21 AM

Originally posted by Tempest

Tested negative April 29th... So I guess they need to go back to April 14th and work forward from there.. Lovely.. Just Lovely...

at least April 14th

Aim is a bunch of idiots its sad that these morons are the best our industry can do

Mike South

It's No wonder I took up drugs and alcohol, it's the only way I could dumb myself down enough to cope with the morons in this biz.
Comment
DWB

Registered User

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 31779
Share

Post
#11

06-13-2009, 03:32 AM

This is all assuming that her last negative test was not a false negative. I've read many times that the PCR-DNA test can often give false reports.

In theory, she may have been HIV+ for longer than everyone thinks and the test just never caught it.
Comment
StuartD

Sofa King Band

Join Date: Jul 2002

Posts: 29903
Share

Post
#12

06-13-2009, 03:44 AM

HIV... it's the new swine flu.

or is it the other way around?

This is me on facebook
This is me on twitter
Comment
xxxdesign-net

My hips don't lie

Join Date: Nov 2002

Posts: 10129
Share

Post
#13

06-13-2009, 08:04 AM

Originally posted by Tempest

Tested negative April 29th... So I guess they need to go back to April 14th and work forward from there.. Lovely.. Just Lovely...

Oh yeah, April 29th, my bad...
Comment
BFT3K

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Dec 2005

Posts: 10764
Share

Post
#14

06-13-2009, 08:16 AM

LA Times Story...

http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la...,3569962.story
Comment
aniloscash

Confirmed User

Join Date: Oct 2008

Posts: 1161
Share

Post
#15

06-13-2009, 08:54 AM

seems like there should be some new standards set moving forward. A test when returning from a foreign country followed by no work until a second test can be performed. One thing is we are going to have to make some changes or there will certainly be regulation.

Got Milf Traffic Contact Me ICQ 473236446
j (at)anilos (dot)com
http://www.aniloscash.com
Comment
DWB

Registered User

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 31779
Share

Post
#16

06-13-2009, 10:15 AM

Originally posted by aniloscash

seems like there should be some new standards set moving forward. A test when returning from a foreign country followed by no work until a second test can be performed.

Do you honestly think some of the dirt bags who travel abroad to shoot porn is going to report in that they have been abroad? No way.

Furthermore, what about if a performer just takes a personal vacation out of the country? Test them too? What about if they go on a date with someone not in the industry? Test?

The system is flawed. That's the problem. NOBODY will be 100% truthful with anything. For example, do you think a male porn stud who secretly loves cock and is bi-sexual, is gong to spill the beans on himself, tell everyone he takes it in the ass and then lose work over it? Not a chance. He will suck dick and get railed up the ass, maybe even by total strangers from a glory hole in some peep show, and not tell a soul about it, but he will show up to work the next day with a clean bill of health from AIM.

This is the risk everyone takes. Any test is better than none, and having AIM is better than not having AIM, but it's time for personal responsibility here and either use condoms or know that you may end up with HIV, Hep or any other STI, having no one to blame but yourself.
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...