'ThickCash.com Launches MorphFeeds Morphing RSS!

Blogging revenue and profits FTW

thats really unique!!!

nice

but, can you explain "duplicate content penalty" in detail and how it works exactly for those of us who don't know?

its been theorized that google is looking at the sentences on a page and comparing it to the cloud database, to see if the same sentences/content is being used.. if so, it gives a negative number penalty value when calculating page rank....

so copying wikipedia articles on your sites, thinking it will help get better results, is nulled by this concept.


on a different note.. thickcash affiliate manager should be using the new T3 Affiliate Analysis tool, to help their affiliates maximize traffic to the program

hit me up on icq to see a demo..

Fight the interjection!

stop messing up my fun.


there are a lot of myths surrounding this. and simple word replacement schemes are easily detected regardless and is no different than republishing the exact same feed.

what i'm curious about is how do people arrive at the conclusion that a very old spamming technique that's been around since the beginning, is now new and innovative technology.

even more interesting is how it was determined that google does not/can not detect simple word replacement schemes from dictionary databases across what could potentially be 1000's of domains?

;)

FIGHT THE SPAMMER!

google does have a team of PhD, who look at how data is related to each other, fuzzy logic, relationships, etc.

so you can take words from a sentence and compute vectors to represent those phrases.. and so when searching for a phrasing (that also allows for some derivatives in the sentence structure), that the result can be quickly found, rather than having to do a slow and old-tech method of keyword/phrase searching through multi-terrabytes of data.

so i do believe that google does do this.... and given the fact that they are scanning/OCR literary text at libraries, it allows them to have more data.

by looking at the page rank weighting of websites, that includes the linking relationships, then overlaying the content to see duplicates, that they do decide which website is the authority or the originator or who is a more credible source for the text, in order to give that site the higher ranking. to do so, means you need to demote/penalize the duplicates to force them down on page rank that allows the true ones to bubble up.

google should be using this brain trust to then wipe out the SEO garbage websites, so that it leaves only relevant results.

bing seems to be doing this.

i know that M$ has people who are reviewing websites to categorize them as porn, mainstream, etc, etc....so to use that human data and combined with computing, to be able to filter out the garbage, thus making search results more relevant.

thats where the wikipedia founder is trying to create a human verified search engine (kinda like dmoz but without the ego trips).

i see the days of free traffic from google diminish and the SEO people get weeded out, all for the sake of improving quality.

also, google is a domain registrar, so they have access to domain registration data, so if you have loaded up alot of websites on the same IP, or using the same account, they can use that information as part of the cross-referencing.. which is why SEO gamers have multiple domain accounts at multiple domain registries, hosting on multiple webhosts to try and outsmart google.


Fight the hypothetical theorizing!

I think what Brandon is trying to say is that the search engines are only going to get better at spotting bullshit, and in the end, original content is going to win.

LOL.... what he said


Fight the cliff notes!