Adult Sites Don?t Have to Verify Models? Ages, Holland Justice Says - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

Paul Markham

Too old to care

Join Date: Jun 2001

Posts: 52942
Share

Post
#1

Adult Sites Don?t Have to Verify Models? Ages, Holland Justice Says

06-09-2009, 10:25 PM

Adult Sites Don?t Have to Verify Models? Ages, Holland Justice Says.

So what happens is the site owner has content of a 15 year old on his site?

Just about the most stupid thing I have ever heard a judge say.

It's like saying "We can't stop people breaking laws so let's not bother."

We have to take measures to protect young people from those who would exploit them, from themselves and most importantly protect ourselves from them.

Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70
Tags: None
moeloubani

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2007

Posts: 4235
Share

Post
#2

06-09-2009, 10:33 PM

same thing that happens if you're in canada - you go to jail for underage porn

but its the police's job here to prove that a model is below 18 and shit, if you don't want to end up in jail you better keep a copy of an id and make sure that your models are 18 years old, the point here is if you know the model is 18 (like if its your grandma or some shit) then you don't need to do that whereas in the US you would still need it
Comment
Paul Markham

Too old to care

Join Date: Jun 2001

Posts: 52942
Share

Post
#3

06-09-2009, 10:56 PM

Originally posted by moeloubani

same thing that happens if you're in canada - you go to jail for underage porn

but its the police's job here to prove that a model is below 18 and shit, if you don't want to end up in jail you better keep a copy of an id and make sure that your models are 18 years old, the point here is if you know the model is 18 (like if its your grandma or some shit) then you don't need to do that whereas in the US you would still need it

Good points, but 2257 documentation goes beyond proving the model is 18. also proves the content is legal. Even if she's 85 she can still sue you.

Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70
Comment
moeloubani

Confirmed User

Join Date: Dec 2007

Posts: 4235
Share

Post
#4

06-09-2009, 11:13 PM

sue for what though? aren't you the one with the rights to the pictures/video as long as youre the photographer? she'd have to pretty much say you raped her wouldn't she? i dont do any shooting if i did id make sure i had model releases with all that just to make sure but technically i mean like you can go take pictures of britney spears walking down the street and sell them and britney spears cant do shit
Comment
grumpy

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Jan 2002

Posts: 9870
Share

Post
#5

06-09-2009, 11:47 PM

the judge ruled that you dont have to have the id's but you can still get caught for underage models. 2257 in usa doesnt realy work does it.

Don't let greediness blur your vision | You gotta let some shit slide
icq - 441-456-888
Comment
Mefo

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2002

Posts: 6169
Share

Post
#6

06-10-2009, 12:01 AM

It's for secondary producers..... The people shooting still need to have vaild docs.
Comment
$5 submissions

I help you SUCCEED

Join Date: Nov 2003

Posts: 32189
Share

Post
#7

06-10-2009, 04:35 AM

Originally posted by Mefo

It's for secondary producers..... The people shooting still need to have vaild docs.

There you have it.

Need a NON-ADULT income stream? We build your YOUTUBE CHANNEL for only $20 per video!

For Hire: $3/hour or $400 per month Marketing Specialist Virtual Assistants
Comment
SpicyM

Confirmed User

Join Date: Aug 2006

Posts: 4577
Share

Post
#8

06-10-2009, 04:46 AM

"Website owners and their companies that operate in the Netherlands don?t have to prove their models are over the age of consent"

??? Age of consent is 16.. so does that mean 17 is ok to shoot?

no sig, sorry
Comment
voa

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Nov 2006

Posts: 16532
Share

Post
#9

06-10-2009, 04:53 AM

That is little bit disturbing,lot of strange thing happened in Holland
Comment
chuvii

Confirmed User

Join Date: Sep 2006

Posts: 691
Share

Post
#10

06-10-2009, 04:54 AM

maybe he's smoke some ganj ?

Mainstream and Adult Design
Comment
Pleasurepays

BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES

Join Date: Aug 2002

Posts: 11913
Share

Post
#11

06-10-2009, 04:54 AM

my understanding is that they are saying you don't need a second law telling you not to break the first law. it is not about proof of age, its about requiring a publisher to have the docs as 2257 does.

its illegal to produce and publish pics of an underage person. the burden of proof is still on the person that produced the image.

i would guess (without caring enough to read the decisions) that they view it as being redundant to create a law to insure no one is breaking the first law. otherwise... why not create 1000 laws... with the 1000th, to make sure you don't break the 999th, the 999th to make sure you don't break the 998th etc...
Comment
CDSmith

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: May 2001

Posts: 51460
Share

Post
#12

06-10-2009, 04:57 AM

Originally posted by Mefo

It's for secondary producers..... The people shooting still need to have vaild docs.

Which is as it should have been all along.

Promote Wildmatch, ImLive, Sexier.com, and more!!

ALWAYS THE HIGHEST PAYOUTS: Big Bux/ImLive SIGNUP ON NOW!!!
Put some PUSSYCA$H in your pocket. ICQ me at: 31024634
Comment
notime

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 8027
Share

Post
#13

06-10-2009, 05:03 AM

Underage is still an criminal act in Holland. Law focusses on real underage CP and not 17 year old and 10 months old people that made a movie/pic when they were drunk and show their titties.

The newspaper in Holland said the SITEOWNERS do not have to prove the age like with the 2257 docs (unless its obvious CP).
Comment
pornlaw

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2007

Posts: 1902
Share

Post
#14

06-10-2009, 05:27 AM

With the age of consent being 16, I would worry about buying content from anyone in the Netherlands. I believe that Hungary's age of consent is 15. This may be good for those that are there, but it just complicates things for those that want to purchase content and have to be 2257 compliant.

Michael

www.AdultBizLaw.com
Comment
notime

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 8027
Share

Post
#15

06-10-2009, 06:52 AM

Originally posted by pornlaw

With the age of consent being 16, I would worry about buying content from anyone in the Netherlands. I believe that Hungary's age of consent is 15. This may be good for those that are there, but it just complicates things for those that want to purchase content and have to be 2257 compliant.

Porn video or photo it is 18 years in Holland, not 16 as you state.
Comment
notime

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 8027
Share

Post
#16

06-10-2009, 07:06 AM

Originally posted by pornlaw

I would worry about buying content from anyone in the Netherlands. This may be good for those that are there, but it just complicates things for those that want to purchase content and have to be 2257 compliant.

You might be confusing professionals content providers that even license US studios from The Netherlands with full 2257 docs with this implication.
Comment
pornlaw

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2007

Posts: 1902
Share

Post
#17

06-10-2009, 07:47 AM

I wasnt trying to call into question your business. Sorry if it came across that way. I was merely making the point that someone purchasing content from countries outside the US must be extra vigilant.

I had a client that purchased bulk content from an eastern European broker only to find that one of the scenes contained an underage girl having hardcore sex.

If I hadnt gone through and looked at every scene, he probably would have distributed it never knowing that it was CP.

Michael

www.AdultBizLaw.com
Comment
notime

Confirmed User

Join Date: Jun 2003

Posts: 8027
Share

Post
#18

06-10-2009, 08:11 AM

Originally posted by pornlaw

I wasnt trying to call into question your business. Sorry if it came across that way. I was merely making the point that someone purchasing content from countries outside the US must be extra vigilant.

I had a client that purchased bulk content from an eastern European broker only to find that one of the scenes contained an underage girl having hardcore sex.

If I hadnt gone through and looked at every scene, he probably would have distributed it never knowing that it was CP.

No problem. I must have read it the wrong way probably.
Most content providers/studios/producers I've known for many many years so I know who the good guys are by experience. I don't let new amateur suppliers in easy and manually check lot's of content & 2257 docs first before I even consider taking it for our broker site. Especially not from some countries where they don't take the laws very seriously.
Most fall of anyway if I ask if the 2257 papers are in their own name/company name and if they can send some samples (most never reply to that email after trying to be a supplier first...)
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...