For sure, you had those all boy bands like Take That or Fuckstreet boys but at least they were visibly marketed for 13 year old girls etc. I think there always was this easy listening kid music, but you could still hear say Joe Cocker or Tina Turner on radio or TV too if I remember well, those seem like GODS compared to those daemons with synthesizer these days.
I don't think there would ever be a situation where you would be bombed with juvenile audiovisual stupidity as much as now.
And if you grow older, what do they try to market to you?
Bullshit bands with hair that had to cost cost more than Beyonce's ass that sing politically correct lyrics about "love" and "feelings" and they play guitars, so they are already "musicians" and have those long refrains and it's insane.
I also only listen to hip hop a bit and like mainly old school east coast, as I realized that can one characterize the acts I really respect.
Yeah I'm not too overblown from say Green Day but damn it's much better if kids listen to Green Day than to those donkeys.
Will check that out thanks.
Hell yeah, good heavy \ hair metal is like watching a good B movie, it ain't no Bergman but it's entertaining as hell.
Well I'm currently residing in Prague, so it's a little bit out of hand, so far I have Motley Crue and Motorhead on my list of nearest concerts, too bad I missed ZZ Top, had to be out of the city that night.
I think it's actually like he's a little bit like the gofdather of those EMO maniacs, you could see lot of really depressed people with NIN signs and black shirts etc.
Here's another point, I'm buying me Rolling stone time from time, and it seems that MOST of what they write about are older acts!
You see there really established stars like Bruce Springsteen etc. with interviews flashes etc. well I would expect only like 30 pct. of the magazine is dedicated to new / trendy / charting acts.
Why?
Well they wouldn't have anything to write about -
"Lil Wayne got loaded, banged a couple ho's and then raped the synthesizer for a new single." end of story
It's interesting.
I don't think there would ever be a situation where you would be bombed with juvenile audiovisual stupidity as much as now.
And if you grow older, what do they try to market to you?
Bullshit bands with hair that had to cost cost more than Beyonce's ass that sing politically correct lyrics about "love" and "feelings" and they play guitars, so they are already "musicians" and have those long refrains and it's insane.
You've hit the nail on the head. There's been interesting music this decade (not just indy stuff or 90s legacy bands like Green Day - but even stuff from, believe it or not, people like Neil Diamond - listen to "Pretty Amazing Grace" if you want to hear a GREAT record). But fun, or funny? That well pretty much dried up in the 90s 
And to me, that's one of the things that made music from the 50s through the early 90s great. (BTW, I'm definitely not a country fan, but if you want to find a recent, really fun song - check out "She Left Me For Jesus" by Hayes Carl." 
)
And to me, that's one of the things that made music from the 50s through the early 90s great. (BTW, I'm definitely not a country fan, but if you want to find a recent, really fun song - check out "She Left Me For Jesus" by Hayes Carl." )Will check that out thanks.
Well I'm currently residing in Prague, so it's a little bit out of hand, so far I have Motley Crue and Motorhead on my list of nearest concerts, too bad I missed ZZ Top, had to be out of the city that night.
You see there really established stars like Bruce Springsteen etc. with interviews flashes etc. well I would expect only like 30 pct. of the magazine is dedicated to new / trendy / charting acts.
Why?
Well they wouldn't have anything to write about -
"Lil Wayne got loaded, banged a couple ho's and then raped the synthesizer for a new single." end of story
It's interesting.
Comment