I know this group can throw some slang... hoes.com has something new...

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • mb
    Confirmed User
    • May 2001
    • 1550

    #1

    I know this group can throw some slang... hoes.com has something new...

    Proud of my new project and want to show it off a bit...

    If you know some funny Slang, throw it here:
    http://www.hoes.com/werd/ (werd.com)

    I know you guys know some good shit!

    marc
  • fris
    I have to go potty
    • Aug 2002
    • 55835

    #2
    nice feature you have there
    Since 1999: 69 Adult Industry awards for Best Hosting Company and professional excellence.


    My Newest Theme

    Comment

    • PSD CSS XHTML
      Confirmed User
      • Mar 2009
      • 546

      #3
      Pretty simple idea that will definitely add some 'stickiness' to your site.

      . . psd to xhtml/css conversions . . cost effective css template solutions . . and now offering css lessons . .
      My XBIZ profile

      Comment

      • Socks
        Confirmed User
        • May 2002
        • 8475

        #4
        Did Mr. Chi City come through for you and the voice work?

        I know he was the right guy..

        I think he got semi-offended when I told him about some "negro voice work" though... lolz.

        Comment

        • mb
          Confirmed User
          • May 2001
          • 1550

          #5
          Originally posted by Socks
          Did Mr. Chi City come through for you and the voice work?

          I know he was the right guy..

          I think he got semi-offended when I told him about some "negro voice work" though... lolz.


          no, I told him about it and he never responded... got someone just as good though...

          http://www.hoes.com/tyrone/

          Comment

          • Killswitch - BANNED FOR LIFE

            #6
            Good idea, and awesome domain, but bad execution, you could gain so much more grounds if it wasn't attached or redirected to a porn site...

            Comment

            • mb
              Confirmed User
              • May 2001
              • 1550

              #7
              Originally posted by Killswitch
              Good idea, and awesome domain, but bad execution, you could gain so much more grounds if it wasn't attached or redirected to a porn site...

              I hear ya... I've grappled with that for a while. I decided to link it up with hoes.com to further increase the stickiness of the site. That's why Werd only deals with adult related terms. It's not just another urbandictionary. There will be synergy between terms and porn categories later... I haven't released that yet.

              Comment

              • mb
                Confirmed User
                • May 2001
                • 1550

                #8
                Originally posted by Killswitch
                Good idea, and awesome domain, but bad execution, you could gain so much more grounds if it wasn't attached or redirected to a porn site...

                I also plan to take the redirect off of werd.com.

                If google didn't hate duplicate content, I'd have everything available on both domains.

                Comment

                • XPays
                  Team Player
                  • May 2004
                  • 13002

                  #9
                  coolness
                  InterNext Expo Domain Auction Live Now thru Feb 5
                  HuntingMoon GFY Domains Marketplace is LIVE
                  XPays always pays! Top Site: * RealJasmine.com * + HotelHeiress® with The Paris Hilton Sex Video
                  Insert the HotelHeiress® HD FEED into your members areas
                  XPin.com Opening for Pin Partners Soonish
                  Mainstream Offers For Emailers and DomainersNONADULT.COM


                  Like Us!

                  Comment

                  • Killswitch - BANNED FOR LIFE

                    #10
                    Originally posted by mb
                    I also plan to take the redirect off of werd.com.

                    If google didn't hate duplicate content, I'd have everything available on both domains.
                    I envy you, although a good domain for what you're using it for... I saw it and instantly had tons of ideas running through my head on what I could do with it... I'll give you $9.95 for it :D

                    Comment

                    • Mickey_
                      • Nov 2005
                      • 4238

                      #11
                      Looks good Marc. Refreshing. ;)


                      LifeSelector Affiliates - Make money today promoting the online porn of tomorrow.

                      mb [at] lifeselector.com

                      Comment

                      • Pleasurepays
                        BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES
                        • Aug 2002
                        • 11913

                        #12
                        Originally posted by mb
                        I also plan to take the redirect off of werd.com.

                        If google didn't hate duplicate content, I'd have everything available on both domains.
                        that's not what Google meant/means by "duplicate content"

                        for example, almost all news online is syndicated (AP, Reuters etc) and therefore, "duplicate content" and there is no negative impact to syndicating news or for that matter... having a large portion of the text on multiple pages of the same site (i.e. summary linking to the full story)

                        Googles addressing of "duplicate content" like 1/2 of the myths people get their panties in a twist over, is something to address spam and blatant attempts at manipulating search results... not legitimate or syndicated content and sites.



                        Comment

                        • mb
                          Confirmed User
                          • May 2001
                          • 1550

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Pleasurepays
                          that's not what Google meant/means by "duplicate content"

                          for example, almost all news online is syndicated (AP, Reuters etc) and therefore, "duplicate content" and there is no negative impact to syndicating news or for that matter... having a large portion of the text on multiple pages of the same site (i.e. summary linking to the full story)

                          Googles addressing of "duplicate content" like 1/2 of the myths people get their panties in a twist over, is something to address spam and blatant attempts at manipulating search results... not legitimate or syndicated content and sites.




                          very good points...

                          Comment

                          • mb
                            Confirmed User
                            • May 2001
                            • 1550

                            #14
                            Originally posted by Mickey-AWE
                            Looks good Marc. Refreshing. ;)

                            Thanks man... just trying something new :-) And having fun with it.

                            marc

                            Comment

                            Working...