Quote:
Originally Posted by Jel
Paul's threads are pretty much always like those trick questions there are multiple answers to, where group a tells group b that they are 100% wrong, group b does the same to group C who arrived at a different but factually correct answer, and so on.
Slight difference being paul is usually answering a different question than he asked, or responding to things that weren't put forward by others, or simply taking a quote out of context and explaining in multiple paragraphs where everyone else who answered correctly went wrong. By the end it's just a giant clusterfuck of different subject matters and crossed wires where most people leave the others to it.
|
his problem is that he compares apples with santa clause.
he talks about numbers that he does not understand and that are completely out of context.
he missmatch views, visitors, unique visitors and content views and throws numbers around where he do not even know what they represent.
it is impossible to explain a bloody amateur with the logic of a lemming what is going on in this market - he does not even understand the language of this market.
i know i should not answer anymore - actually nobody should answer him anymore - maybe he gives up to write bullshit, when he find out that really NOBODY takes him serious. but i have a bullshit allergy and always when i read bullshit my fingers start to type.