Quote:
Originally Posted by OneHungLo
“If we had had confidence that the president had clearly not committed a crime we would have said so.” Mueller.
That’s not how it works in America. Investigators are supposed to look for evidence that a crime was committed, and, if they don’t find enough to contend that a crime was a committed, they are supposed to say “We didn’t find enough to contend that a crime was committed.” They are not supposed to look for evidence that a crime was not committed and then say, “We couldn’t find evidence of innocence.”
https://www.nationalreview.com/corne...should-accept/ |
That dumb argument would hold water if they were able to charge Trump but their hands were tied. Quit trying to compare this to some prosecutor deciding whether to charge someone over a pound of weed.
You're being desperate and are grasping at straws.