26 U.S. Code § 7213. Unauthorized disclosure of information - GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum

X

Grapesoda

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 46234
Share

Post
#1

26 U.S. Code § 7213. Unauthorized disclosure of information

05-07-2019, 06:18 PM

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/7213

should be interesting with you mothefuckers crying about the law all the time. I'm thinking the NYT is liable for a big lawsuit

(3) Other persons
It shall be unlawful for any person to whom any return or return information (as defined in section 6103(b)) is disclosed in a manner unauthorized by this title thereafter willfully to print or publish in any manner not provided by law any such return or return information. Any violation of this paragraph shall be a felony punishable by a fine in any amount not exceeding $5,000, or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.

think they will put the editor of the times in jail or just some flunky?
Tags: None
kane

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Aug 2001

Posts: 20684
Share

Post
#2

05-07-2019, 06:20 PM

Laws matter now?
Comment
RedFred

Confirmed User

Join Date: Feb 2016

Posts: 9782
Share

Post
#3

05-07-2019, 06:20 PM

You're more concerned with that than your President being a criminal? Fuck is wrong with you?
Comment
crockett

in a van by the river

Join Date: May 2003

Posts: 76818
Share

Post
#4

05-07-2019, 06:23 PM

Originally posted by Grapesoda

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/7213

should be interesting with you mothefuckers crying about the law all the time. I'm thinking the NYT is liable for a big lawsuit

(3) Other persons
It shall be unlawful for any person to whom any return or return information (as defined in section 6103(b)) is disclosed in a manner unauthorized by this title thereafter willfully to print or publish in any manner not provided by law any such return or return information. Any violation of this paragraph shall be a felony punishable by a fine in any amount not exceeding $5,000, or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.

think they will put the editor of the times in jail or just some flunky?

I have no doubt that Trump will attempt to sue the NYT.. he tries to sue everyone, hell that was Cohen's entire job..

I'm pretty sure however the NYT has pretty fucking smart lawyers and knows what is actually legal and what is not..

The key point that you are missing here is NYT did not publicly post Trump's tax returns. They wrote a investigative article based on information with-in those tax returns. One is legal, one is not...

What I find odd though is why are you right wingers are always more worried about prosecuting the leaker not the people committing the crimes?

In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
Comment
Bladewire

StraightBro

Join Date: Aug 2003

Posts: 56220
Share

Post
#5

05-07-2019, 06:26 PM

Originally posted by Grapesoda

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/7213

should be interesting with you mothefuckers crying about the law all the time. I'm thinking the NYT is liable for a big lawsuit

(3) Other persons
It shall be unlawful for any person to whom any return or return information (as defined in section 6103(b)) is disclosed in a manner unauthorized by this title thereafter willfully to print or publish in any manner not provided by law any such return or return information. Any violation of this paragraph shall be a felony punishable by a fine in any amount not exceeding $5,000, or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.

think they will put the editor of the times in jail or just some flunky?

But you were so PRO "WHISTLE BLOWER" when the russians released all our government info.

Now that Trump is the government your ass burns of unlubed ass fucking.

You ok bro?

Skype: CallTomNow
Comment
Grapesoda

So Fucking Banned

Join Date: Jul 2003

Posts: 46234
Share

Post
#6

05-07-2019, 06:26 PM

Originally posted by crockett

I have no doubt that Trump will attempt to sue the NYT.. he tries to sue everyone, hell that was Cohen's entire job..

I'm pretty sure however the NYT has pretty fucking smart lawyers and knows what is actually legal and what is not..

The key point that you are missing here is NYT did not publicly post Trump's tax returns. They wrote a investigative article based on information with-in those tax returns. One is legal, one is not...

What I find odd though is why are you right wingers are always more worried about prosecuting the leaker not the people committing the crimes?

817 dumb things.. YOU WOULD sue the times if they released your info, then we need a 2 year 30 million dollar investigation to see who colluded to release the docs, oh but wait, you only do that to trump, everyone else gets a walk
Comment
Rochard

Jägermeister Test Pilot

Join Date: Dec 2001

Posts: 75733
Share

Post
#7

05-07-2019, 06:33 PM

Originally posted by Grapesoda

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/7213

should be interesting with you mothefuckers crying about the law all the time. I'm thinking the NYT is liable for a big lawsuit

(3) Other persons
It shall be unlawful for any person to whom any return or return information (as defined in section 6103(b)) is disclosed in a manner unauthorized by this title thereafter willfully to print or publish in any manner not provided by law any such return or return information. Any violation of this paragraph shall be a felony punishable by a fine in any amount not exceeding $5,000, or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.

think they will put the editor of the times in jail or just some flunky?

Amazing. Our president's entire campaign staff committed treason by working with the Russians, but THIS is what is important to you.

It seems you do not understand how the law works. If anyone on GFY posts such information that would be covered from this law, they would most likely go to jail. However, if a newspaper posts something it would be covered under freedom of the press.

However, if you feel this way.... You would agree that Julian there should face jail time... right?

Herschel Savage
Brooklyn, NY
Comment
crockett

in a van by the river

Join Date: May 2003

Posts: 76818
Share

Post
#8

05-07-2019, 06:51 PM

In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
Comment
onwebcam

Fake Nick 1.0

Join Date: Oct 2005

Posts: 27689
Share

Post
#9

05-07-2019, 06:53 PM

They most likely obtained them via court records.. More of "nothing to see here"

PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.
Comment
crockett

in a van by the river

Join Date: May 2003

Posts: 76818
Share

Post
#10

05-08-2019, 07:52 AM

Originally posted by Grapesoda

817 dumb things.. YOU WOULD sue the times if they released your info, then we need a 2 year 30 million dollar investigation to see who colluded to release the docs, oh but wait, you only do that to trump, everyone else gets a walk

Well at least I dont have to count the dumb things you say because every thing you say is dumb.

It's funny that you get so butthurt over things that negatively affect your "Dear Leader" but never blink an eye to illegal shit he does..

You care nothing about his war against our checks and balances, nothing about his daily lies, nothing about his disregard to the law to our Constitution..

You care about nothing but are 1st in line to defend your cult leader the moment anyone speaks badly..

In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.
Comment
Acepimp

All Facts Matter

Join Date: Jan 2012

Posts: 20319
Share

Post
#11

05-08-2019, 08:26 AM

Originally posted by crockett

What I find odd though is why are you right wingers are always more worried about prosecuting the leaker not the people committing the crimes?

CNN's Tapper: Obama has Prosecuted More Whistleblowers than all previous administrations COMBINED

^^ Once again Crockett is the most uninformed person on this board.

Earn Recurring Money with ➜ Live Adult Webcams | CrakRevenue | Dream Cash

Just Surfing? The Sexiest Models Are At >> CBCamgirls.com

Chat with live Streamate Camgirls
Comment
Bladewire

StraightBro

Join Date: Aug 2003

Posts: 56220
Share

Post
#12

05-08-2019, 08:44 AM

Originally posted by crockett

What I find odd though is why are you right wingers are always more worried about prosecuting the leaker not the people committing the crimes?

They don't want Assange or wikileaks prosecuted and they got their data from espionage.

Notice how they are anti-government, until they are they are the government, now the release of private stolen data must be prosecuted to the fullest extent of the law!!! Why are Trump supporters so fucking stupid?

Skype: CallTomNow
Comment
onwebcam

Fake Nick 1.0

Join Date: Oct 2005

Posts: 27689
Share

Post
#13

05-08-2019, 09:12 AM

Nadler has basically admitted their entire motive is to obtain the pending grand jury information. It's now amended that information can't be included/unredacted so the entire contempt shit show is irrelevant.

PLEASE WAIT WHILE BIDEN ADMIN UNINSTALLS ITSELF.....
██████████████████▒ 99.5% complete.
Comment
pimpmaster9000

Too lazy to set a custom title

Join Date: Dec 2011

Posts: 26730
Share

Post
#14

05-08-2019, 11:38 PM

1 US code 1: spy on everybody possible

Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here
Comment

Previous template Next

Working...