Originally posted by ControlThy
Its an opinion, if you find it offensive, I am sorry you feel that way.
Objectivity has nothing to do with my personal opinion.
If you like a pornstar type of woman, no problem.
Its an opinion, if you find it offensive, I am sorry you feel that way.
Objectivity has nothing to do with my personal opinion.
If you like a pornstar type of woman, no problem.
Your assertion that nude models wear 1000 USD worth of make-up should be an objective observation (from someone in this biz) were it based on fact. It is not. I shoot content and I don't know any models who wear 1000 USD worth of make up.
Also do you know why they wear make up? Many models I work with have amazing blemish free skin! The reason they wear make up is to compensate for the studio lighting we use.
Don't let the facts get in the way of a good story? Every one has an opinion and this is purely subjective, when expressing that opinion in context they cld apply it to facts.
Originally posted by ControlThy
No offense, but any woman who needs to pose nude with toys in every possible hole and wears 1000 USD worth of makeup is not a natural beauty and not attractive to me.
And I agree with Mister Fletch XXX, real pornstars turn me off - if I wanted a "woman" like that I would just visit a local cheap brothel.
Mister Labret's girlfriend certainly is a good looking lady and so is lady Cheshire.
No offense, but any woman who needs to pose nude with toys in every possible hole and wears 1000 USD worth of makeup is not a natural beauty and not attractive to me.
And I agree with Mister Fletch XXX, real pornstars turn me off - if I wanted a "woman" like that I would just visit a local cheap brothel.
Mister Labret's girlfriend certainly is a good looking lady and so is lady Cheshire.
You refer to ppl as Mister and Lady. And nude models as "woman" like that" being avalaible at a cheap brothel.
Your judgement blurs your ability to see the facts.


That's just plain unfair for everyone else!
Comment