I think the people that said yes didn't look at the source... newbs would list this gallery... noone else would... I certainly wouldn't. Most tgps do not list galleries that have dynamic images and secondly there is no header or anything... the html is all fucked up. Another no-no is the scripting... most tgps don't accept galleries with JavaScript in them.
Guyes thanks lot. I am happy that white plane simple backround does not bother you.
I am working to change other things.
Something like 90+ percent of all the text you read in your life [especially while learning] is black text on a white background. This is the most trusted color combination.
I'm all for minimalistic designs but that's too much, or too little actually. If you are going to keep it that simple and only have one text link and one banner, then that is one VERY important piece of text.
"Hot pretty teen exposing herself" doesn't really inspire clicks..
and of course all the comments that were made about your html, the lame lightbox for the images. I know that's cool right now on blogs etc, but it doesn't work for galleries.
I have my resolution cranked up pretty high and I still couldn't see the girls face and the button to click for the next pic without scrolling. It just doesn't work.
Make it a normal gallery, increase the font size on that text link, write some juicier text, and ultimately, the banner should be replaced too. NO ONE clicks on generic banners anymore. Hell, that was true 5 years ago.
. . psd to xhtml/css conversions . . cost effective css template solutions . . and now offering css lessons . . My XBIZ profile
I have a pet hate for galleries which break the browsing experience. For people who are used to clicking back, or pressing backspace, using flash or j/s to display pics is going to piss them off.
Another thing I notice about that script is that it doesn't display the image until it's fully loaded. Not going to be popular if the surfer's connection is slow.
I dunno, maybe I'm a dinosaur, I like to keep things simple...
I have a pet hate for galleries which break the browsing experience. For people who are used to clicking back, or pressing backspace, using flash or j/s to display pics is going to piss them off.
Another thing I notice about that script is that it doesn't display the image until it's fully loaded. Not going to be popular if the surfer's connection is slow.
I dunno, maybe I'm a dinosaur, I like to keep things simple...
I think the people that said yes didn't look at the source... newbs would list this gallery... noone else would... I certainly wouldn't. Most tgps do not list galleries that have dynamic images and secondly there is no header or anything... the html is all fucked up. Another no-no is the scripting... most tgps don't accept galleries with JavaScript in them.
Comment