Senator Arlen Specter Switches Party

Looks like it's not bullshit
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...aYSVwD97RIK2O3

Pendulum keeps swinging further right and further left...another great day for our 2 party no options system!!

On a positive note, I hope this continues to wake up my fellow Libertarians!!!! (all 10 of us ;)

I don't know why he was ever a Repub to begin with. This is his best hope for re-election.

It's actually good for the country. We will now have people to blame & thank for the next few years.

You guys are nuts. One party government is very definitely NOT a good thing.

You guys are nuts. One party government is very definitely NOT a good thing.

You guys are nuts. One party government is very definitely NOT a good thing.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single-payer_health_care

Single-payer health care is now back on the table. Watch this pass fast.


Healthcare for everybody!

You guys are nuts. One party government is very definitely NOT a good thing.

It will only last for a short while as nation-x mentioned above. Neither party can be trusted with total control so just enjoy the ride.

Both parties always screw up these kinds of opportunities.

They better work fast is all. I predict a big reversal next election.

They better work fast is all. I predict a big reversal next election.

Obviously, these rankings are a snapshot in time, and subject to change.

1. Kentucky-Bunning (R) incumbent. Yeah, he's an incumbent. That's the whole reason the race ranks where it does.

Bunning, if he is renominated, is this year's answer to Rick Santorum. And at the moment, it looks quite a lot like he will be renominated. The Republicans don't look set to primary him (although I'm sure they'd like to), since the strongest candidate in the pool, Secretary of State Trey Grayson, won't run for the seat unless Bunning doesn't run.

The Democrats have two strong candidates in the race, with Attorney General Jack Conway enjoying particularly strong polling numbers (currently he is polling ahead of Grayson).

A lot could change - Bunning could still retire, which would drop this race considerably. But right now, we feel that Democrats have a better chance of beating Bunning than taking any open seat.

2. Missouri-OPEN: Bond (R) Yes, this is a controversial selection, since everybody likes New Hampshire more than this race.

Missouri ranks second, however, for the following reasons. Democrats have an exceptional candidate with statewide name recognition (and a particularly famous last name), Robin Carnahan. Republicans have a controversial candidate with high name recognition (and high negatives), Roy Blunt. He also has a famous last name, as his son was a wildly unpopular Governor, and his wife and children are lobbyists (which will not go over well).

Blunt's first-quarter fundraising was pretty lame, and there are already concerns from within the GOP about his chances.

3. New Hampshire-OPEN: Gregg (R). The consensus number 1 or 2 pick is our Number 3. We agree that it's got a fairly good chance of flipping, with Democratic Rep. Paul Hodes in the Senate race already.

Hodes' Q1 fundraising wasn't stellar, but he's got a head start in that regard, and there isn't a lot of talent in the New Hampshire GOP to take him on at the moment. Defeated Senator John E. Sununu is one potential candidate, as is the man Hodes defeated in 2006, former Rep. Charlie Bass.

Both could be decent statewide candidates, and perhaps beat Hodes if the 2010 climate is favorable enough for Republicans, but given the recent Democratic trend in New Hampshire, the party ought to feel pretty good about this one.

4. Ohio-OPEN: Voinovich (R). Pennsylvania is a popular choice for the third position on many lists, given the fairly high probability that incumbent Repub Arlen Specter will lose a primary election to right-winger Pat Toomey, essentially gifting the seat to the Democrats.

We picked Ohio third for the moment since Specter is still standing, and there's at least a chance that he does survive the primary.

The Ohio race pits a couple of fairly strong Dems, Lee Fisher and Jennifer Brunner, against a fairly strong Republican, former Congressman, OMB Director and US Trade Representative Rob Portman. Portman's fundraising has been very good, but he has trailed fairly consistently in polling, and lacks the statewide base that Fisher and Brunner have.

5. Pennsylvania-Specter(R) incumbent. Will run as a Democrat. Preliminary polls show him with a 30 point lead over Tomey.

6. Connecticut-Dodd (D) incumbent. Dodd is actually weaker for the general election than Specter is. However, Dodd has the good fortune of not facing a primary challenge (at least not now).

7. North Carolina-Burr (R) incumbent. Democrats are actually very bullish on their chances of beating Burr, and with good reason; he's currently polling four points below North Carolina's popular Attorney General, Roy Cooper.

8. Colorado-Bennet (D) incumbent. Bennet isn't that widely known, nor is he wildly popular at the moment among those who have formed an opinion.

Fortunately for Bennet, his potential Republican opponents aren't faring so well in polling, either.

Bennet still has to get past a possible Democratic primary (House Speaker Andrew Romanoff is one potential candidate), and should have a fairly close election if he does. Still, he's got the better part of two years to raise his profile - and his favorables.

9. Florida-OPEN: Martinez (R). This is the lowest-ranked "competitive" open seat, due to the possibility that popular Republican Gov. Charlie Crist might enter the Senate race.

Crist would be a formidable candidate in the general election, and would make a pretty tough race for either Democratic candidate (Rep. Kendrick Meek and State Sen. Dan Gelber). As a moderate Republican, however, it's possible Crist could get a serious primary challenge, which would make things a lot more interesting.

If Crist doesn't enter the race, things look considerably easier for both Democrats. If he does, this race drops a few slots.

10. Louisiana-Vitter (R) incumbent. Diaper Dave's rather notorious involvement in the D.C. madam scandal affected his polling numbers rather adversely.

We don't know who's going to run against him, but it should be a moderately competitive race. This is certainly a likely Republican hold, but it's a viable race for the Democrats.

11. Nevada-Reid (D) incumbent. There was a time when Reid was the most endangered Democrat, but circumstances have changed. Former Rep. Jon Porter has gone to K Street, Rep. Dean Heller and former state Sen. Joe Heck are looking at Carson City and the Governor's mansion, and Lieutenant Governor Brian Krolicki is under indictment.

This leaves former Club For Growth darling Sharron Angle and imported Wall Street exec John "Chachi" Chachas as the chief pretenders. Not an inspiring pool for the GOP, for what would be a winnable race.

12. Arkansas-Lincoln (D) incumbent. Initially this did not look like it would be much of a race, as Lincoln is a two-term incumbent, and there isn't much talent in the Arkansas Republican Party, which didn't even field a challenge to junior Sen. Mark Pryor in 2008.

However, a couple of second-tier candidates are polling fairly well against Lincoln, indicating there might be genuine cause for concern here.

13. Illinois-Burris (D) incumbent. Roland Burris thinks Roland Burris is great news for Roland Burris, but no one else does. Fortunately, Roland Burris probably won't be the candidate next fall.

The Illinois GOP is at its lowest ebb at the moment, but they have one guy in the field who could make this quite a race, U.S. Rep. Mark Kirk. This race will jump a few spots if and when Kirk does get in.

Other races to watch:

Alaska-Murkowski (R) incumbent. It would take an exceptional candidate and campaign to make this competitive.

Arizona-McCain (R) incumbent. McCain should be just fine unless someone manages to torpedo him in a Republican primary, which is perhaps not completely out of the realm of possibility.

California-Boxer (D) incumbent. The California GOP is in worse condition now than they've been in decades after Obama ran riot, electorally speaking, in California, picking up 61% of the vote. Still, no place to go but up, right?

Delaware-OPEN: Kaufman (D). This race would be one of the most competitive in the country, instantly, if Republican Rep. Mike Castle runs. At the moment, it's looking like he might, although no one knows, including Castle himself. Heck, he could retire altogether for all anyone knows (he's 70 years old).

We'll reevaluate this one if Castle runs, but without Castle, it should be a fairly easy Democratic hold.

Iowa-Grassley (R) incumbent. Grassley is apparently figuring on getting a primary challenge. Any Democrat would have a tough time beating him, but if he gets torpedoed in the primary, it's a whole new ballgame.

Kansas-OPEN: Brownback (R). No Sebelius and no Gov. Mark Parkinson in the race, and one of the toughest states for a Democrat in the entire country. It's an open seat, but...

New York-Gillibrand (D) incumbent. Maybe this seat's in real danger of flipping, but it looks pretty safe for now. If the GOP gets former New York Gov. George Pataki to run, this might be more competitive, but even then, it's a tough race for Republicans. After all, Pataki left office with approval ratings worse than Eliot Spitzer's when he left office.

North Dakota-Dorgan (D) incumbent. Take the Delaware comment and substitute Gov. John Hoeven for Rep. Mike Castle, and you've got a similar situation.

One big difference: Hoeven trails Dorgan, badly, in polling.

Oklahoma-Coburn (R) incumbent. He might retire, or do any number of bizarre things. It's Tom Coburn.

Texas-OPEN (sort of): Hutchison (R). This race would rank higher if it existed, but at the moment, it doesn't. We're waiting for a retirement from KayBee, which we may not get until she is elected Governor.

Wisconsin-Feingold (D) incumbent. He should be OK, but it's certainly possible for the GOP to throw a good scare into him. He's won three elections, but has maxed out (so far) at 55% of the vote.

Here is the Democrat take on 2010

You guys are nuts. One party government is very definitely NOT a good thing.

Not really.

Dems had total control for decades after FDR's inaguration.

Also from Watergate until 1994.

The Presidency went back and forth at times, but Dems have had a stranglehold on congress for very long periods of time.

Yeah. Except when it's your party, right?

I grew up in the Philly area so I've seen a lot of media coverage of Specter over the years and he always seemed a lot smarter than your typical faux news approved republican.

Any guesses on when universal healthcare will become a reality?

Any guesses on when universal healthcare will become a reality?

Though now that its a hair away from being a 1 party system, isn't that a bad thing? Whether you are a Republican or a Democrat surely you don't want 1 party to have ultimate power.. thats not how democracy is supposed to work.

Though now that its a hair away from being a 1 party system, isn't that a bad thing? Whether you are a Republican or a Democrat surely you don't want 1 party to have ultimate power.. thats not how democracy is supposed to work.

How is democracy supposed to work?
The people vote but those votes only count if one party doesn't get too many of them?

I'm sure conservatives are crying doom and gloom over this but TBH, it doesn't change much except the speed at which the Dems will be able to do things.
Republicans won't be able to throw as many procedural hurdles in the way to delay things. They already didn't have enough votes to flat out stop things.

With Franken being all but a sure thing from MN, all the dems needed was one defection to get past a filibuster anyways.....and on the biggest issue they'll take up this session, health care, they were going to use the reconciliation process so that a filibuster wouldn't have been possible anyways.

In a two-party system, don't you find it a little bit odd that a candidate representing a particular party can switch parties just like that? Think of all of the people that voted Republican for him... they basically just got screwed. That's how it becomes less of a "democracy," in my opinion.

People can scream and shout all day long that they vote for individuals and not parties, but I don't believe that for one minute. People vote party line.

He isn't the first or the last to do this, I just find it odd.

Oh and what is Obamas withdrawal plan for Afghanistan?

You really don't know much about Obama's platform... it is obvious whenever you post about it... he never even once announced a withdrawal from Afghanistan... he has called for more troops there since the beginning because it is the war we should have been fighting from jump street instead of wasting time and resources in Iraq.

I understand he wants more troops in Afghanistan. Bush wanted war with Iraq and the left was yelling "WHATS YOUR EXIT STRATEGY??!!!" "You cant got to war without an exit strategy!". Where as Obama can place more troops into Afghanistan and the question has yet to be answered.

I agree with you about the need for a clear exit strategy... however, Bush's neglect of the conflict there has left a super mess with the Taliban gaining strategic power in Pakistan now... it's a fucking bomb waiting to explode... literally. I think it's almost impossible to say what the strategy will be until they see some progress.