Quote:
Originally Posted by Pseudonymous
Most sites these days actually have the model involved, mainly due to the platforms that exist now. And the small-medium businesses ceasing to exist due to a maturing industry.
Once the content is yours, its yours. You have the rights to use her name and images however you see fit, my model release is extremely detailed.
Its entertainment. It doesn't need to be real. Like reality tv. They are paying for the content that costs to shoot
Definitely not morally wrong, I would threaten to sue. She is illegally claiming rights to content she does not own. In a DMCA notice, which she is having filed, she is swearing that she owns the right or has the approval from the owner to be taking it down.
Obviously this is all dependent on your model release being done by a professional and it covering all of this.
I assure you that she will stop when she gets a notice from your lawyer, something you should have done the first time
|
Thanks Ryan... Yeah I understand things are changing... we shot this content however 4 years ago before the likes of OnlyFans and other clip and webcam sites had the female talent singing "Sisters Are Doing It For Themselves"... I acknowledge that and applaud it... but that shouldn't devalue our stuff...
We paid a pretty penny for the content and still offered her a % to be interactive with the site
I think we were more than fair... and are now being painted as the bad guys... I am confident our Model Release as us covered... one DMCA company as already told us it does, however this new DMCA company seem to want to push the extra yard, I guess they are only looking out for their client, just a shame she's a disgruntled model...
