Originally Posted by Pseudonymous

Thats so entirely false, people have been telling me that for a decade. Its never been accurate. The girls I simply shot 100s of sets (and paid for) and released right away made more than most active webcamming solo girls, sure unless they cammed on major platforms everyday and drove traffic to their sites but generally a model a webmaster brings to the market, they do not want on public platforms due to the fact they learn they dont need the webmaster.

But if you are referring to camming internally, it helps but if she's good enough, she doesn't need to cam. Also being active on social media is even better than camming internally. Majority of sales do not rebill. Once they get the content. They come back every now and then, will not continue paying monthly. So getting in new members is more important than entertaining existing members

You could say you were referring to camming publically on major platforms but nevermind the risk involved. Is that a scalable business model? I dont believe so. Not for the average webmaster. It's easier to find gorgeous inactive models or gorgeous social media girls than it is to find a girl who will cam on chaturbate daily, who is good enough.

There's also other things to consider, if shes an active cam girl, that means she gets a percent. That gives you alot less earnings. You not only now receive half of what you could, she gets half, her getting half means it will most likely not be enough to keep her involved or around, especially when shes camming on major platforms. When you pay a girl out and shes not active, not only can you update more frequently and never miss an update and not worry about her up and leaving, you can use the content and create social media accounts and drive traffic as if you she is active.