Obama forces GM CEO resignation

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • tony299
    lurker
    • Aug 2002
    • 57021

    #51
    Originally posted by Splum
    You have got it all wrong, these companies didnt fail because of the leadership of a few people they failed because of their social policies towards workers and unions. You cannot be competitive when you are paying your workers 4 times as much as foreign car companies. This guy would have been burned at the stake had he suggest a 75% pay cut for GM workers. One man leaving GM is not going to save it, public money will not save it either, only shedding of jobs will save it. Why arent you mad at Obama for giving YOUR money to failed businesses?
    That's not true they didn't get paid 4 x as much as foreign workers. If you want to argue please do it with facts. The big problem they couldnt compete with the socialized medicine those other countries have. The right scream at the idea of government healthcare but paying everyone 10 bucks an hour is cool. Also why are you alright with fucking the guy busting his ass on the line but the ceo running the company in to the ground. Thats fine and his big fucking golden parachute.

    Comment

    • directfiesta
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Oct 2002
      • 30184

      #52
      Originally posted by Splum
      It isnt Obama's money.
      Are you just plain dumb .... or playing dumb ?
      I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

      But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

      Comment

      • Sly
        Let's do some business!
        • Sep 2004
        • 31379

        #53
        Originally posted by Splum
        Sure if the BOARD OF DIRECTORS wants him fired I would support that, thats what happens in companies. The problem here is that THE GOVERNMENT IS DECIDING WHO IS BEST TO RUN THIS FAILED COMPANY. This is nationalization pure and simple and you obviously support it.
        Apparently you have reading issues. I've already stated I did not support any bailout from the beginning. His company failed and he ultimately failed. The executives at any of the big three could burn alive tomorrow and I would not care one bit. They have burned their employees, they have burned the common taxpayer, and they have not kept up with market demands due to their own stupidity and lack of foresight. Each and everyone of them requesting money should be ousted. They have failed. Period.
        Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted

        Windows VPS now available
        Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc.
        Click here for more details.

        Comment

        • Splum
          Confirmed User
          • May 2003
          • 6195

          #54
          Originally posted by dyna mo
          it's clear the OP didn't read the article and also is not educated about the history of such actions of u.s. presidents from the article:
          Dont you mean socialist presidents? Look you are missing the point, the government should not be allowed to take control of businesses unless the business is illegal plain and simple. You have no idea what dangerous waters you are treading if you agree with this administration. What this administration is doing is NO DIFFERENT than what Chavez is doing in Venezuela.

          Comment

          • Splum
            Confirmed User
            • May 2003
            • 6195

            #55
            Originally posted by Sly
            Apparently you have reading issues. I've already stated I did not support any bailout from the beginning. His company failed and he ultimately failed. The executives at any of the big three could burn alive tomorrow and I would not care one bit. They have burned their employees, they have burned the common taxpayer, and they have not kept up with market demands due to their own stupidity and lack of foresight. Each and everyone of them requesting money should be ousted. They have failed. Period.
            Apparently you have comprehension issues, I agree wholeheartedly but your logic defies me. If you believe the company is failed why give it OUR money?

            Comment

            • Splum
              Confirmed User
              • May 2003
              • 6195

              #56
              Originally posted by directfiesta
              Are you just plain dumb .... or playing dumb ?
              Shut the fuck up you stupid Canuck. Go suck your Queens dick you know NOTHING of freedom.
              Canadian Monarch HM Queen Elizabeth II

              Comment

              • tony299
                lurker
                • Aug 2002
                • 57021

                #57
                Originally posted by Splum
                Dont you mean socialist presidents? Look you are missing the point, the government should not be allowed to take control of businesses unless the business is illegal plain and simple. You have no idea what dangerous waters you are treading if you agree with this administration. What this administration is doing is NO DIFFERENT than what Chavez is doing in Venezuela.
                if the companies take government money and want more.They are answerable.

                Comment

                • Splum
                  Confirmed User
                  • May 2003
                  • 6195

                  #58
                  Originally posted by tony404
                  if the companies take government money and want more.They are answerable.
                  Dude with that argument anytime you make a tax deduction you are accountable as well.

                  Comment

                  • tony299
                    lurker
                    • Aug 2002
                    • 57021

                    #59
                    Originally posted by Splum
                    Dude with that argument anytime you make a tax deduction you are accountable as well.
                    That makes no sense. Its my money not the government and Im asking them for nothing.

                    Comment

                    • Sly
                      Let's do some business!
                      • Sep 2004
                      • 31379

                      #60
                      Originally posted by Splum
                      Apparently you have comprehension issues, I agree wholeheartedly but your logic defies me. If you believe the company is failed why give it OUR money?
                      I already said we shouldn't have given them any money!
                      Vacares - Web Hosting, Domains, O365, Security & More - Paxum and BTC Accepted

                      Windows VPS now available
                      Great for TSS, Nifty Stats, remote work, virtual assistants, etc.
                      Click here for more details.

                      Comment

                      • Splum
                        Confirmed User
                        • May 2003
                        • 6195

                        #61
                        Originally posted by tony404
                        That makes no sense. Its my money not the government and Im asking them for nothing.
                        Actually you do owe that money initially to the government, it is not yours. The government allows you to deduct it from what you owe. Of course that is up to the government to decide which when and how many deductions you can claim. By taking their deduction you are legally agreeing to the terms and compliance of that deduction. Rest assured you do owe that money initially.

                        Comment

                        • GAMEFINEST
                          Make STACK$
                          • Nov 2006
                          • 14470

                          #62
                          dayam, ceo got bitch slapped..
                          Compound interest.

                          Comment

                          • Pleasurepays
                            BANNED - SUPPORTING TUBES
                            • Aug 2002
                            • 11913

                            #63
                            yeah.. .Obama clearly the bad guy here. It's not like people have been getting pissed off about this very thing.

                            the appropriate thing to do would have been for him to ask for the money... then resign and stand aside like a rational human being with the health/future of the company in mind. instead.. they all fly to DC on private jets and basically say "yeah... just go ahead and load the plane with cash while we go get a good meal and crack open a few 1000.00 bottles of wine.

                            Comment

                            • Splum
                              Confirmed User
                              • May 2003
                              • 6195

                              #64
                              Originally posted by Pleasurepays
                              they all fly to DC on private jets and basically say "yeah... just go ahead and load the plane with cash while we go get a good meal and crack open a few 1000.00 bottles of wine.
                              Yeah its not like Obama doesnt have a private jet or is taking trillions of tax payer money while partying it up.

                              Comment

                              • Serge Litehead
                                Confirmed User
                                • Dec 2002
                                • 5190

                                #65
                                this is pointless

                                Comment

                                • JJ Gold
                                  Confirmed User
                                  • Aug 2004
                                  • 1969

                                  #66
                                  Some of you all just don't get the big picture.

                                  The government is going to dictate to you what type of vehicle you are allowed to drive.

                                  This is just the latest salvo in the mission to ban fun in the name of the "environment".

                                  Comment

                                  • Splum
                                    Confirmed User
                                    • May 2003
                                    • 6195

                                    #67
                                    Originally posted by JJ Gold
                                    Some of you all just don't get the big picture. The government is going to dictate to you what type of vehicle you are allowed to drive. This is just the latest salvo in the mission to ban fun in the name of the "environment".
                                    That certainly is a high possibility. I think they will meet with some resistance but then again most of the fucking idiots on this board think humans are causing global warming.

                                    Comment

                                    • cykoe6
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • Apr 2005
                                      • 4499

                                      #68
                                      While there is no doubt that Obama has a radical socialist agenda and is marching the US down the road to ruin, it seems reasonable that if GM is demanding to be bailed out by the government that the government will have some say in how it is run.

                                      It s the bailout itself that is outrageous.... not the resignation of the CEO. Now if we could just get Obama to resign.
                                      бабки, шлюхи, сила

                                      Comment

                                      • BlackCrayon
                                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                                        • Jun 2003
                                        • 19634

                                        #69
                                        Originally posted by Sausage
                                        Socialism isn't all that bad, and you are already half way down the path anyway. Nothing any of you can do about it either, you are losing your rights at an alarming pace.
                                        Says the guy from the country that is forcing isp's to block any kind of sexual material...
                                        you don't know you're wearing a leash if you sit by the peg all day..

                                        Comment

                                        • grumpy
                                          Too lazy to set a custom title
                                          • Jan 2002
                                          • 9870

                                          #70
                                          Originally posted by Splum
                                          You dont get it do you, THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEMANDED A PRIVATE CITIZEN LEAVE A PUBLICLY TRADED COMPANY. Are you willing to die for this President? Better ask yourself that seriously because its a real possibility.
                                          you dont get it. They want billions, the rotten tomatoes have to go. He is taking care of your tax money, you should thank him.
                                          Don't let greediness blur your vision | You gotta let some shit slide
                                          icq - 441-456-888

                                          Comment

                                          • kane
                                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                                            • Aug 2001
                                            • 20684

                                            #71
                                            Originally posted by Splum
                                            What are you talking about, GM is a publicly traded company. The government LOANED GM money they didnt BUY stock. You want to know the real reason? Because STOCKS normally go UP when a CEO resigns which gives the company more money AND Im sure some of Obamas friends will make a nice nickel when they sell their shares tomorrow.
                                            It is pretty simple. If your company is about to go bankrupt and you come to me asking for billions in loans to help dig you out of your hole, I can set some conditions of the loan. If I say that I want the CEO that lead you into the downward spiral gone or no loan the company, and that CEO, have a choice. If they want him to stay, then they can get the money elsewhere. Nobody is forcing them to take the money.

                                            He was in trouble before this stipulation ever came into place. There was talk of ousting him after their first appearance before congress a few months ago.

                                            Comment

                                            • kane
                                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                                              • Aug 2001
                                              • 20684

                                              #72
                                              Originally posted by Splum
                                              And when they come for Wildcash whose head should we cut off?
                                              Wildcash isn't asking for a huge loan from the government (or anyone for that matter) so it isn't the same thing.

                                              Comment

                                              • roly
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • Aug 2002
                                                • 1844

                                                #73
                                                Originally posted by Splum
                                                Why would you give this company a loan anyways? They dont hold mortgages to homes. Allow the car companies to fail and let the free market correct itself. This is stupid no one can give me a good reason why the government is giving GM money anyways. Michigan unemployment is already in double digits, Detroit is a fucking bombed out shell of a city already, why is it going to make any difference?

                                                Ill tell you why its going to make a difference, Obama doesnt want his unemployment numbers to truly reflect what is going on in this country. He wants to slow the bleeding so he can get re-elected.

                                                So let me get this straight its ok that Obama is fucking your kids as long as he takes down a couple of rich people to satisfy your class warfare wishes? Sick, just sick.
                                                14 million jobs rely on the auto industry in the US (1 in 10 jobs), that's a lot of lost income tax. I'm not sure if you pay social security to unemployed people in the US as well? Then you have 14 million people who haven't got money to spend on other stuff which has a big impact on other industries. That's why they are bailing them out.

                                                Comment

                                                • pocketkangaroo
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Jan 2005
                                                  • 8452

                                                  #74
                                                  Originally posted by Splum
                                                  You dont get it do you, THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA DEMANDED A PRIVATE CITIZEN LEAVE A PUBLICLY TRADED COMPANY. Are you willing to die for this President? Better ask yourself that seriously because its a real possibility.
                                                  It was a stipulation for getting money from the government. When you deal with investors and banks, they often require you to do certain things to get your money. I worked at a VC funded internet company years ago and the guys with the capital would come in and demand certain things be changed or they wouldn't loan the money.

                                                  If GM doesn't like it, they certainly have the right to not borrow money from the government and find a private loan elsewhere. Otherwise, if you want our money, you play by our rules. Welcome to the real world.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • nation-x
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • Mar 2004
                                                    • 5370

                                                    #75
                                                    Originally posted by pocketkangaroo
                                                    It was a stipulation for getting money from the government. When you deal with investors and banks, they often require you to do certain things to get your money. I worked at a VC funded internet company years ago and the guys with the capital would come in and demand certain things be changed or they wouldn't loan the money.

                                                    If GM doesn't like it, they certainly have the right to not borrow money from the government and find a private loan elsewhere. Otherwise, if you want our money, you play by our rules. Welcome to the real world.


                                                    Splum - Barack Hussein Obama is the President... he isn't a "socialist president". You say your a libertarian but post links from ridiculous right wing sites and constantly spew right wing talking points and racist comments on this board. I don't know anything about you other than the personality you portray on this board... do you live in Ohio or Missouri?

                                                    Comment

                                                    • kmanrox
                                                      aka K-Man
                                                      • Oct 2001
                                                      • 29295

                                                      #76
                                                      alot of the things obama is doing is pretty dictator-ish.. getting thing passed and laws created, things stopped, retributions imposed with a swift hand... while that sounds a bit un-american to me, it may just be what the country needs.. a little tough love... within reason.
                                                      Crypto HODLr
                                                      Crypto mining
                                                      Angel investor

                                                      Comment

                                                      • pornguy
                                                        Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                        • Mar 2003
                                                        • 62910

                                                        #77
                                                        Originally posted by SomeCreep
                                                        Rick Wagoner had his chance. Under his leadership, GM lost billions of dollars in market cap. GM needs someone who can successfully downsize the company to a level that is realistic with US demand for automobiles.


                                                        GM needs to just shut down with no bail out money.
                                                        PornGuy skype me pornguy_epic

                                                        AmateurDough The Hottes Shemales online!
                                                        TChicks.com | Angeles Cid | Mariana Cordoba | MAILERS WELCOME!

                                                        Comment

                                                        • Davy
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Apr 2006
                                                          • 4323

                                                          #78
                                                          Obama basically blackmailed GM.
                                                          ---
                                                          ICQ 14-76-98 <-- I don't use this at all

                                                          Comment

                                                          • nation-x
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Mar 2004
                                                            • 5370

                                                            #79
                                                            Originally posted by kmanrox
                                                            alot of the things obama is doing is pretty dictator-ish.. getting thing passed and laws created, things stopped, retributions imposed with a swift hand... while that sounds a bit un-american to me, it may.
                                                            I don't agree with this sentiment... I don't think he has been dictatorial at all. If he was he would be signing a mad amount of Executive Orders like Bushy did. I find it refreshing that he is actually working to accomplish goals... I just think you aren't used to that.

                                                            Originally posted by kmanrox
                                                            just be what the country needs.. a little tough love... within reason
                                                            I totally agree with this.

                                                            Just for the record... I don't like the way they are handling the automakers. They are bailing out huge banking/insurance institutions with almost no stipulations to date... but are making the automakers toe the line and the amount of money the automakers are asking for is far smaller than what the banks want... it's ridiculous and hypocrisy. Millions of people are employed by the automakers... and in addition they are treating them each differently... one get's 60 days to provide a restructuring plan and the other gets 30 days or nothing... it's bullshit in my book.

                                                            Comment

                                                            • GatorB
                                                              The Demon & 12clicks
                                                              • Oct 2001
                                                              • 18208

                                                              #80
                                                              Originally posted by Splum
                                                              What the fuck is going on in this country when the President of the United States can FORCE a CEO of a company to resign? I mean the guy did nothing illegal, he may have been a poor CEO or mad bad decisions but last time I checked this wasnt a communist nation.

                                                              http://www.freep.com/article/2009032...31-year+career
                                                              Ok idiot let me explain. Say you own a company and your CEO sucks so much you have to come to ME for a loan. Now if I say "get rid if the idiot or you don't get any money" you have 2 choices A) get rid of the idiot. B) keep him and go belly up. Now it's MY money why can't I ditate the rules under which it's loaned? Don't come begging me for money then bitch about the terms.

                                                              Comment

                                                              • JJ Gold
                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                • Aug 2004
                                                                • 1969

                                                                #81
                                                                GM is down 25% this morning.

                                                                http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=gm

                                                                Obama is a one man stock market wrecking crew.

                                                                Comment

                                                                • directfiesta
                                                                  Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                  • Oct 2002
                                                                  • 30184

                                                                  #82
                                                                  Originally posted by JJ Gold
                                                                  GM is down 25% this morning.

                                                                  http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=gm

                                                                  Obama is a one man stock market wrecking crew.
                                                                  Yep, a bunch of Obama's are on the assembly line as well as on the board of directors ....

                                                                  Rumors are that a lot of other Obama's are at AIG ....

                                                                  I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

                                                                  But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • GatorB
                                                                    The Demon & 12clicks
                                                                    • Oct 2001
                                                                    • 18208

                                                                    #83
                                                                    Originally posted by JJ Gold
                                                                    GM is down 25% this morning.

                                                                    http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=gm

                                                                    Obama is a one man stock market wrecking crew.
                                                                    Yeah like GM and it's idiot CEOs had nothing to do with it's problems. I mean it was running just fine until today.

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • JJ Gold
                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                      • Aug 2004
                                                                      • 1969

                                                                      #84
                                                                      Originally posted by GatorB
                                                                      Yeah like GM and it's idiot CEOs had nothing to do with it's problems. I mean it was running just fine until today.
                                                                      The market is reacting to Obama's unprecedented Socialist agenda, not the fundamentals at GM.

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • DateDoc
                                                                        Outside looking in.
                                                                        • Feb 2005
                                                                        • 14243

                                                                        #85
                                                                        The problem isn't so much that Obama wanted the guy out. The issue is that it was done publicly and it was made known this is what the Administration wanted and got.

                                                                        This will cause way more issues than just at GM. Obama is playing for a huge power grab that in essence is circumventing the balance of power in the government. People are seeing this and it is making them cautious as to where they put their money.

                                                                        There are even Democrats, like Senator Byrd, that have gone on record saying this huge effort to grab more power by the President/White House is totally wrong. http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0209/19303.html

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • tony299
                                                                          lurker
                                                                          • Aug 2002
                                                                          • 57021

                                                                          #86
                                                                          Go obama go

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • cykoe6
                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                            • Apr 2005
                                                                            • 4499

                                                                            #87
                                                                            Originally posted by JJ Gold
                                                                            The market is reacting to Obama's unprecedented Socialist agenda, not the fundamentals at GM.
                                                                            Very good point.
                                                                            бабки, шлюхи, сила

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • Bryan G
                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                              • Aug 2005
                                                                              • 8338

                                                                              #88
                                                                              Originally posted by Splum
                                                                              Shut the fuck up you stupid Canuck. Go suck your Queens dick you know NOTHING of freedom.

                                                                              Yes Splum Canada is not a free country
                                                                              Bryan
                                                                              skype: bryan.glass3 | ICQ 302999591

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • smax
                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                • Jun 2007
                                                                                • 341

                                                                                #89
                                                                                Originally posted by Splum
                                                                                You have got it all wrong, these companies didnt fail because of the leadership of a few people they failed because of their social policies towards workers and unions. You cannot be competitive when you are paying your workers 4 times as much as foreign car companies. This guy would have been burned at the stake had he suggest a 75% pay cut for GM workers.

                                                                                It was a combination of both, just look at GM's sales decline over the past 5 years. Pull your head out of your ass and stop being so partisan, people like YOU are whats wrong with America right now. Too concerned about supporting your parties ideology, instead of doing what is right.

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • potter
                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                  • Dec 2004
                                                                                  • 6559

                                                                                  #90
                                                                                  splum is an idiot as always

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • nation-x
                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                    • Mar 2004
                                                                                    • 5370

                                                                                    #91
                                                                                    Originally posted by JJ Gold
                                                                                    The market is reacting to Obama's unprecedented Socialist agenda, not the fundamentals at GM.
                                                                                    If you want people to listen to your crap you should know what your talking about first... "Socialist Agenda" is merely an empty talking point... if Obama were a socialist he would have nationalized everything right from jump. As far as socialism goes... Obama hasn't introduced anything new to the equation... we have been a socio capitalist country ever since the New Deal.

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • potter
                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                      • Dec 2004
                                                                                      • 6559

                                                                                      #92
                                                                                      Originally posted by nation-x
                                                                                      If you want people to listen to your crap you should know what your talking about first... "Socialist Agenda" is merely an empty talking point... if Obama were a socialist he would have nationalized everything right from jump. As far as socialism goes... Obama hasn't introduced anything new to the equation... we have been a socio capitalist country ever since the New Deal.
                                                                                      People don't understand the definition of socialism at all. The big problem is the right-wing agenda using it as a media tactic.

                                                                                      Obama, the dems and the liberals. All the "evil socialists". Are for things like public programs, welfare, and bailouts etc. All of which are the exact opposite of socialism.

                                                                                      In true socialism, there is no unemployment or welfare. Everyone MUST work. Everyone MUST have a job. There is no getting money for not working, or getting a bailout. That IS NOT socialism.

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • potter
                                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                                        • Dec 2004
                                                                                        • 6559

                                                                                        #93
                                                                                        Also, although everyone realizes splum is an idiot. It should be brought to his attention.

                                                                                        Obama told Michigan lawmakers Sunday night that both companies had failed to meet the terms of their loans and weren't viable today.
                                                                                        The auto industry came to congress. It wasn't the other way around. Splum, you should remember that before opening your mouth again.

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • cykoe6
                                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                                          • Apr 2005
                                                                                          • 4499

                                                                                          #94
                                                                                          Originally posted by nation-x
                                                                                          If you want people to listen to your crap you should know what your talking about first... "Socialist Agenda" is merely an empty talking point... if Obama were a socialist he would have nationalized everything right from jump. As far as socialism goes... Obama hasn't introduced anything new to the equation... we have been a socio capitalist country ever since the New Deal.
                                                                                          This is nonsense. Even Chavez who is an avowed socialist has not nationalized everything all at once. The popular support for big government socialism is not strong enough to do it all at once, so it has to be done a piece at a time. Obama is a longtime leftist radical so his moves towards a socialist agenda are hardly surprising. He is attempting to mask his radical agenda by using euphemisms like "change" and "stimulus."

                                                                                          Even the Bolsheviks took more than 20 years to nationalize the whole economy in the USSR and they were certainly not "stealth socialists" like Obama. Obama was trained by Saul Alinksy and is using classic Alinksy techniques to implement a hard left agenda against the will of the general populace. He is manipulating legitimate public fears and populist sentiments over the current economic crisis to lead the country down the path towards a state planned and controlled economy. Only his most deluded supporters or leftists propagandists who support his real agenda would dispute that at this point.
                                                                                          бабки, шлюхи, сила

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • potter
                                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                                            • Dec 2004
                                                                                            • 6559

                                                                                            #95
                                                                                            Originally posted by cykoe6
                                                                                            This is nonsense. Even Chavez who is an avowed socialist has not nationalized everything all at once. The popular support for big government socialism is not strong enough to do it all at once, so it has to be done a piece at a time. Obama is a longtime leftist radical so his moves towards a socialist agenda are hardly surprising. He is attempting to mask his radical agenda by using euphemisms like "change" and "stimulus."

                                                                                            Even the Bolsheviks took more than 20 years to nationalize the whole economy in the USSR and they were certainly not "stealth socialists" like Obama. Obama was trained by Saul Alinksy and is using classic Alinksy techniques to implement a hard left agenda against the will of the general populace. He is manipulating legitimate public fears and populist sentiments over the current economic crisis to lead the country down the path towards a state planned and controlled economy. Only his most deluded supporters or leftists propagandists who support his real agenda would dispute that at this point.
                                                                                            Actually, nationalization does not equal socialism. Also, what is happening is not nationalization. What is happening is a business taking on a government loan, and adhering to the terms of that loan.

                                                                                            The government is not controlling or nationalizing any part of this business. The business made the decision to sign and agree to the terms. They took on that responsibility. The auto industry itself is in no way going to go under or become nationalized. There is a big difference between what you're suggesting and what is actually happening here.

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • cykoe6
                                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                                              • Apr 2005
                                                                                              • 4499

                                                                                              #96
                                                                                              Originally posted by potter
                                                                                              Actually, nationalization does not equal socialism. Also, what is happening is not nationalization. What is happening is a business taking on a government loan, and adhering to the terms of that loan.

                                                                                              The government is not controlling or nationalizing any part of this business. The business made the decision to sign and agree to the terms. They took on that responsibility. The auto industry itself is in no way going to go under or become nationalized. There is a big difference between what you're suggesting and what is actually happening here.
                                                                                              Nationalization does not equal socialism but it is an important step in the process. I agree that the current situation with GM or the banks is not a full nationalization. As I made pretty clear above Obama is attempting to implement his socialist agenda a small piece at a time, as their is not much public support for his radical long term goals. Even if he is unable to take the country all the way down the path towards a state run economy he will certainly do a lot of irreversible damage on his way.

                                                                                              Even the Europeans are aghast at his agenda. They understand the long term implications better than most in the US.
                                                                                              бабки, шлюхи, сила

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • potter
                                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                                • Dec 2004
                                                                                                • 6559

                                                                                                #97
                                                                                                Originally posted by cykoe6
                                                                                                Nationalization does not equal socialism but it is an important step in the process. I agree that the current situation with GM or the banks is not a full nationalization. As I made pretty clear above Obama is attempting to implement his socialist agenda a small piece at a time, as their is not much public support for his radical long term goals. Even if he is unable to take the country all the way down the path towards a state run economy he will certainly do a lot of irreversible damage on his way.

                                                                                                Even the Europeans are aghast at his agenda. They understand the long term implications better than most in the US.
                                                                                                You really only sound like a conspiracy theorist though. Do you have any proof or factual information to provide that will back what you're saying?

                                                                                                Because this isn't Obama's doing, and he isn't attempting anything in this situation. What has happened was a business decision. The auto companies came to congress and asked for a loan. Those loans came with terms which they agreed to. Right now they are simply adhering to those terms. They failed to meet certain qualifications at which this time there are consequences to not meeting them.

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • nation-x
                                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                                  • Mar 2004
                                                                                                  • 5370

                                                                                                  #98
                                                                                                  The whole socialism argument is bull... it rings totally of the same shit that was pulled when McCarthy was looking for communists. It's a pure smear campaign being fed by the right in a weak attempt to disregard their own record of failure and corruption.

                                                                                                  Why do you even care cykoe6? Your russian right? I would think you would be much more concerned with what your own govt is doing... We don't have half of the "power grabbing" issues that your country has.

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • Splum
                                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                                    • May 2003
                                                                                                    • 6195

                                                                                                    #99
                                                                                                    Originally posted by potter
                                                                                                    Also, although everyone realizes splum is an idiot. It should be brought to his attention. The auto industry came to congress. It wasn't the other way around. Splum, you should remember that before opening your mouth again.
                                                                                                    Fuck you shit nugget read the rest of my posts when I said WE SHOULDNT BE GIVING THEM MONEY IN THE FIRST PLACE. It isnt Congress money to give its OUR CHILDRENS money, this money didnt exist before these motherfuckers pulled it out of thin air then expect generations of Americans to pay it back. Next time you open your non-educated mouth Im going to shove my large patriotic cock down your throat bitch.

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    • Splum
                                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                                      • May 2003
                                                                                                      • 6195

                                                                                                      #100
                                                                                                      Originally posted by smax
                                                                                                      It was a combination of both, just look at GM's sales decline over the past 5 years. Pull your head out of your ass and stop being so partisan, people like YOU are whats wrong with America right now. Too concerned about supporting your parties ideology, instead of doing what is right.
                                                                                                      My party? What the fuck are you talking about? Because I disagree with giving failed companies money I am now in some kind of "party". You blind liberal fuck go drink your monkey kool-aid.

                                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                                      Working...