Twistys abusing ICANN policies and pushing people around?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Brujah
    Beer Money Baron
    • Jan 2001
    • 22157

    #501
    Originally posted by PAR
    I just think its funny that some of the same people wanting someone to do something about content theft on tubes are backing a a site that went out of its way to rip off content...
    This isn't a content theft issue. Apples and oranges.

    This is an issue of abusive trademark and domain rights. Maybe even selective enforcement. Definitely the pot calling the kettle black with Shap knowingly infringing on the trademarks of others, which is something hdkiller did not do.

    Comment

    • Juicy D. Links
      So Fucking Banned
      • Apr 2001
      • 122992

      #502
      i cant read all 10 pages but i would like to say that I am str8 and love woman

      Comment

      • arock10
        Confirmed User
        • Jan 2006
        • 6217

        #503
        It has nothing to do with hardsextube.com, content theft, or whatever

        Its is "Sex tube" a generic term or not and if it is a generic term you cant pull this copyright bullshit. Hence the graphs above stating people were looking for sex tubes a long time before sextube.com was made or even TMed

        You may laugh now, but if shap gets away with this, what domains are next? It could be yours and then you lose it, possibly along with a hefty chunk of your income
        Last edited by arock10; 03-03-2009, 09:54 AM.
        Sup

        Comment

        • arock10
          Confirmed User
          • Jan 2006
          • 6217

          #504
          Thar gonna take our landdddssss
          Sup

          Comment

          • JFK
            FUBAR the ORIGINATOR
            • Jan 2002
            • 67369

            #505
            Originally posted by Juicy D. Links
            i cant read all 10 pages but i would like to say that I am str8 and love woman
            would some pictures help ?

            FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX
            For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot com

            Comment

            • Shap
              Confirmed User
              • May 2001
              • 8313

              #506
              Originally posted by Fatbat
              Actually, I wouldn't bother with a cease and desist. All I would have to do is file a UDRP or WIPO case, pay my $1500 for one panelist for up to 5 domains, and you would lose all those domains because the trademark predates your registration and you clearly registered them in bad faith.



              Fuck me, this thread is so full of fail and innernet tough guys it's not even funny. If you never owned a trademark, or if your mark has expired, you've got fuck all.

              This isn't rocket science people, it's pretty cut and dried. Twisty's can take buddy to UDRP or WIPO arbitration, pay $1,500 for one panelist, or $4,000 for three and run a case for up to 5 domains or more if they want to pay a few extra bucks. Both sides then present their evidence and the panel decides. The winner gets to keep the domain(s) barring any further legal action in the courts.

              In this case it would appear to be a simple case of reverse hijacking on Twisty's part, as from what I have read the domain registration predates any TM. However, stranger things have happened at WIPO hearings (look up the WIPO case for knot.com, probably one of the worst decisions ever), so both parties have the option of taking the case to court after the fact if either one of them feels they were wronged.

              Every WIPO decision that has ever taken place, and there are dozens every day, is online for you to search. You'll see that most of you are talking complete shit with all your chest thumping "send me your C&Ds" "I'll whup your ass" "I'm not scared of you" bullshit.

              This isn't fucking 1996. This was all sorted out a long time ago. Name squatting, typosquatting, registrations of existing marks... there are mechanisms in place that protect against this kind of activity and there's not a damn thing you can do to stop someone from taking a domain that has their mark in it, as long as you registered it after the mark was in place. As soon as a WIPO case is filed, the registrar is contacted and they freeze the domain to lock it in place until a decision is handed down.
              I agree with you. Except our domain, trademark and use all predate the site in question.

              Comment

              • alias
                aliasx
                • Apr 2001
                • 19010

                #507
                Originally posted by arock10
                It has nothing to do with hardsextube.com, content theft, or whatever

                Its is "Sex tube" a generic term or not and if it is a generic term you cant pull this copyright bullshit. Hence the graphs above stating people were looking for sex tubes a long time before sextube.com was made or even TMed

                You may laugh now, but if shap gets away with this, what domains are next? It could be yours and then you lose it, possibly along with a hefty chunk of your income
                ^
                https://porncorporation.com

                Comment

                • Lamis
                  So Fucking Banned
                  • Sep 2007
                  • 961

                  #508
                  hhehehehe..

                  This thread is a good example, on how the reputation built on 10 years, can dissapear in a matter of seconds...

                  Shap's reputation was completely ruined. Nobody will ever make business with him again.. And if they do, they are complete idiots and they deserve to fail.

                  Comment

                  • Brujah
                    Beer Money Baron
                    • Jan 2001
                    • 22157

                    #509
                    I'd hate to be the guy that pays thousands for some generic __keyword__sextube.com domain names. Not because he was wrong, but because he'll have to deal with this bullshit.

                    Comment

                    • cess
                      Confirmed User
                      • Sep 2006
                      • 2921

                      #510
                      Originally posted by Fatbat
                      there's not a damn thing you can do to stop someone from taking a domain that has their mark in it, as long as you registered it after the mark was in place.
                      That's funny because the first link for "wipo case" in google is...

                      http://www.wipo.int/amc/en/domains/d...2008-0230.html

                      I'm not gonna read that whole thing. But it looks like drugstore.com went after drugstoretm.com .

                      8. Decision

                      For all the foregoing reasons, the Complaint is denied.

                      Comment

                      • slavdogg
                        Confirmed User
                        • Jan 2001
                        • 3570

                        #511
                        shap
                        dont overplay your hand
                        there is nothing thats stopping someome from canceling your descriptive trademark


                        ps. not a threat of any sort, just a friendly advice
                        Adult Traffic for Sale

                        Comment

                        • Shap
                          Confirmed User
                          • May 2001
                          • 8313

                          #512
                          Originally posted by slavdogg
                          shap
                          dont overplay your hand
                          there is nothing thats stopping someome from canceling your descriptive trademark


                          ps. not a threat of any sort, just a friendly advice
                          Thanks Slav. I have to hit you up about some business as well. I appreciate the advice! I know you know more than probably anyone on these matters

                          Comment

                          • CaptainHowdy
                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                            • Dec 2004
                            • 94172

                            #513
                            Originally posted by ExtremeBank_Adam
                            I envy you...

                            Comment

                            • Brujah
                              Beer Money Baron
                              • Jan 2001
                              • 22157

                              #514
                              I predict this thread disappears. Someone should definitely save it, archive it, if they have any tube domains.

                              Comment

                              • AMDWarrior
                                Confirmed User
                                • Nov 2006
                                • 1484

                                #515
                                Originally posted by ebus_dk
                                because his lawyer told him to, and it seems Shap no longer have the ability to think for himself, or deside when to/not to follow the ADVICE a lawyer gives him.


                                Fuck Shap and Fuck twisty. First they deside to buy bannerspace on contentviolating tubesites, and now they try and steal a domain from a webmaster. Shap - what changed you from a honest webmaster in to the cunt you are now? is it greed?


                                I cant tell you how happy I am I dident go forward and developed that TopNakedness.com domain as planned, because their lawyer would most likely also ask for that domain, because it contained a "T" as in "Twisty"



                                This about sums it up, links fror twisty's have been pulled, fuck twisty's and after reading all this crap fuck that horsecock sucker Micheal, get twisty's balls outta yer mouth ..

                                Comment

                                • Matt 26z
                                  So Fucking Banned
                                  • Apr 2002
                                  • 18481

                                  #516
                                  Wasn't it sex.com that once claimed they had rights to every domain with "sex" in it?

                                  So SexTube.com claims they have rights to HardSexTube.com. Hypothetically speaking, what if Tube.com was developed and TM'd prior to SexTube.com? Shap, would you just turn over your domain with a developed site on it to them?
                                  Last edited by Matt 26z; 03-03-2009, 11:10 AM.

                                  Comment

                                  • Voodoo
                                    ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
                                    • Sep 2002
                                    • 10600

                                    #517
                                    Try registering GoogleYouTube.com and see what happens.

                                    "I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1."

                                    Comment

                                    • Shap
                                      Confirmed User
                                      • May 2001
                                      • 8313

                                      #518
                                      Originally posted by Matt 26z
                                      Wasn't it sex.com that once claimed they had rights to every domain with "sex" in it?

                                      So SexTube.com claims they have rights to HardSexTube.com. Hypothetically speaking, what if Tube.com was developed and TM'd prior to SexTube.com? Shap, would you just turn over your domain with a developed site on it to them?
                                      I'd have to fight for my domain. I believe if someone had TM'd Tube prior to SexTube they would have filed opposition against us when we filed our TM.

                                      Comment

                                      • KillerK
                                        Confirmed User
                                        • May 2008
                                        • 3406

                                        #519
                                        Youtube is what made domains with the word TUBE in them popular. Prior to that MOVIES or CLIPS in them were for movies. Youtube made the embedded flash synonymous for the word TUBE.

                                        I've lost a lot of respect for you going after this guy. Sex Tube is a generic term just like Porn Tube would be.

                                        Comment

                                        • Voodoo
                                          ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
                                          • Sep 2002
                                          • 10600

                                          #520
                                          This may clear some things up:

                                          1. If the mark is used "In The Same Way", it can be viewed as infringing.
                                          2. His mark is "SexTube", not "Sex" & "Tube". Example: http://www.googleit.com (You'd think this would be an issue, no, by the domain alone... but it is not.)
                                          3. You cannot ? dictionary words, which "Tube" is a dictionary word considered to be fair use, and unmarkable as it is a "Generic" term.
                                          4. HardSEXTUBE.com DOES have his mark IN IT. If it were used as Hards ExTube, it's a different story, but Hard Sex Tube would infringe. Just as you can't use DisneyTube.com or PepsiTube.com.
                                          5. The example of Sex.com, goes back to #3. You can't have Sex?.
                                          6. Remember BananaClaire's issue with XXXBizClaire? (It contains the mark "XBiz" in the name... as would XXXBiz)
                                          7. http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?...002:fp6jkm.1.1 (Try to find a dictionary word in the USPTO DB that has been successfully trademarked.
                                          8. SexTube? is a valid mark.
                                          9. The entire purpose of a Trademark is to protect your brand from infringement from others, and to show that you have ownership of said mark. If any Joe Blow could just register any domain he/she wanted regardless of trademarks, what would be the purpose of registering them? The ICANN registry has clear rules regarding trademark violations.
                                          10. YouTube? is the mark. You cannot go register YouTubes.com, iYouTube.com, YouTubeXXX.com etc... Just as you can't register YouSexTube.com or SexYouTube.com.
                                          11. The TM opposition period is open for ANYONE who believes the soon-to-be-registered mark infringes on their existing mark. ie... If you own ExTube.com, and SexTube.com goes up for opposition, if you have an issue with it and think it may cause "Brand Conrfusion", then you must oppose the registration of the mark and go to mediation to explain your case.
                                          12. The KEY POINT is that if the owner of a mark believes someone else's use of a similar mark may cause brand confusion, being in the same industry or market using similar or the same mark, it would need to be reviewed to figure out who has actual ownership and prior / first use of said mark.

                                          Just some tips. I didn't read this entire thread, but these topics seem to be convoluted with loads of incorrect information.

                                          "I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1."

                                          Comment

                                          • Tjeezers
                                            Webmaster
                                            • Mar 2007
                                            • 16605

                                            #521
                                            boring bump
                                            www.Tjeezers.cam

                                            Comment

                                            • Voodoo
                                              ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
                                              • Sep 2002
                                              • 10600

                                              #522
                                              Originally posted by Voodoo
                                              This may clear some things up:

                                              1. If the mark is used "In The Same Way", it can be viewed as infringing.
                                              2. His mark is "SexTube", not "Sex" & "Tube". Example: http://www.googleit.com (You'd think this would be an issue, no, by the domain alone... but it is not.)
                                              3. You cannot ? dictionary words, which "Tube" is a dictionary word considered to be fair use, and unmarkable as it is a "Generic" term.
                                              4. HardSEXTUBE.com DOES have his mark IN IT. If it were used as Hards ExTube, it's a different story, but Hard Sex Tube would infringe. Just as you can't use DisneyTube.com or PepsiTube.com.
                                              5. The example of Sex.com, goes back to #3. You can't have Sex?.
                                              6. Remember BananaClaire's issue with XXXBizClaire? (It contains the mark "XBiz" in the name... as would XXXBiz)
                                              7. http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?...002:fp6jkm.1.1 (Try to find a dictionary word in the USPTO DB that has been successfully trademarked.
                                              8. SexTube? is a valid mark.
                                              9. The entire purpose of a Trademark is to protect your brand from infringement from others, and to show that you have ownership of said mark. If any Joe Blow could just register any domain he/she wanted regardless of trademarks, what would be the purpose of registering them? The ICANN registry has clear rules regarding trademark violations.
                                              10. YouTube? is the mark. You cannot go register YouTubes.com, iYouTube.com, YouTubeXXX.com etc... Just as you can't register YouSexTube.com or SexYouTube.com.
                                              11. The TM opposition period is open for ANYONE who believes the soon-to-be-registered mark infringes on their existing mark. ie... If you own ExTube.com, and SexTube.com goes up for opposition, if you have an issue with it and think it may cause "Brand Conrfusion", then you must oppose the registration of the mark and go to mediation to explain your case.
                                              12. The KEY POINT is that if the owner of a mark believes someone else's use of a similar mark may cause brand confusion, being in the same industry or market using similar or the same mark, it would need to be reviewed to figure out who has actual ownership and prior / first use of said mark.

                                              Just some tips. I didn't read this entire thread, but these topics seem to be convoluted with loads of incorrect information.
                                              NOTE: I'm only speaking about the MARK itself. I'm not talking about prior use or anything.

                                              "I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1."

                                              Comment

                                              • RogerV
                                                Banned!
                                                • Jul 2002
                                                • 12591

                                                #523
                                                Originally posted by Shap
                                                I'd have to fight for my domain. I believe if someone had TM'd Tube prior to SexTube they would have filed opposition against us when we filed our TM.
                                                Remember that advise you gave me? now you understand how I felt your not going to win over the GFY mob.

                                                a few people sent me this thread I cant even believe how many pages it is and your still posting.

                                                good luck with it. This is why I dont even bother with GFY to many anons

                                                you know how it is when your on top everyone guns for you

                                                Comment

                                                • arock10
                                                  Confirmed User
                                                  • Jan 2006
                                                  • 6217

                                                  #524
                                                  Sex Tube is a brand as much as Sex Movies is or XXX Clips.
                                                  Sup

                                                  Comment

                                                  • Shap
                                                    Confirmed User
                                                    • May 2001
                                                    • 8313

                                                    #525
                                                    Originally posted by Voodoo
                                                    This may clear some things up:

                                                    1. If the mark is used "In The Same Way", it can be viewed as infringing.
                                                    2. His mark is "SexTube", not "Sex" & "Tube". Example: http://www.googleit.com (You'd think this would be an issue, no, by the domain alone... but it is not.)
                                                    3. You cannot ? dictionary words, which "Tube" is a dictionary word considered to be fair use, and unmarkable as it is a "Generic" term.
                                                    4. HardSEXTUBE.com DOES have his mark IN IT. If it were used as Hards ExTube, it's a different story, but Hard Sex Tube would infringe. Just as you can't use DisneyTube.com or PepsiTube.com.
                                                    5. The example of Sex.com, goes back to #3. You can't have Sex?.
                                                    6. Remember BananaClaire's issue with XXXBizClaire? (It contains the mark "XBiz" in the name... as would XXXBiz)
                                                    7. http://tess2.uspto.gov/bin/gate.exe?...002:fp6jkm.1.1 (Try to find a dictionary word in the USPTO DB that has been successfully trademarked.
                                                    8. SexTube? is a valid mark.
                                                    9. The entire purpose of a Trademark is to protect your brand from infringement from others, and to show that you have ownership of said mark. If any Joe Blow could just register any domain he/she wanted regardless of trademarks, what would be the purpose of registering them? The ICANN registry has clear rules regarding trademark violations.
                                                    10. YouTube? is the mark. You cannot go register YouTubes.com, iYouTube.com, YouTubeXXX.com etc... Just as you can't register YouSexTube.com or SexYouTube.com.
                                                    11. The TM opposition period is open for ANYONE who believes the soon-to-be-registered mark infringes on their existing mark. ie... If you own ExTube.com, and SexTube.com goes up for opposition, if you have an issue with it and think it may cause "Brand Conrfusion", then you must oppose the registration of the mark and go to mediation to explain your case.
                                                    12. The KEY POINT is that if the owner of a mark believes someone else's use of a similar mark may cause brand confusion, being in the same industry or market using similar or the same mark, it would need to be reviewed to figure out who has actual ownership and prior / first use of said mark.

                                                    Just some tips. I didn't read this entire thread, but these topics seem to be convoluted with loads of incorrect information.
                                                    your post will be ignored and discounted because it doesn't support their argument.

                                                    Comment

                                                    • Shap
                                                      Confirmed User
                                                      • May 2001
                                                      • 8313

                                                      #526
                                                      Originally posted by RogerV
                                                      Remember that advise you gave me? now you understand how I felt your not going to win over the GFY mob.

                                                      a few people sent me this thread I cant even believe how many pages it is and your still posting.

                                                      good luck with it. This is why I dont even bother with GFY to many anons

                                                      you know how it is when your on top everyone guns for you
                                                      I'm better at giving advice than living by it. I felt your pain that night because I know I always get reeled in and torched.

                                                      Comment

                                                      • PAR
                                                        Confirmed User
                                                        • May 2005
                                                        • 1835

                                                        #527
                                                        Originally posted by Brujah
                                                        This isn't a content theft issue. Apples and oranges.

                                                        This is an issue of abusive trademark and domain rights. Maybe even selective enforcement. Definitely the pot calling the kettle black with Shap knowingly infringing on the trademarks of others, which is something hdkiller did not do.
                                                        Right and those people can at anytime contact him and ask him for the URL's
                                                        No one person has asked him to.. nor do we know if over the years other deals were not made.. That would be assuming that anyone else other then Shap knows how and what deals were made for the URL's in question.. Without this info it is mere assumptions.
                                                        So to me its a mute point.. Until someone steps up and post that they have no deal in place... 10+ pages later and still nothing...

                                                        As for is this about content theft or not..
                                                        Ya ok so the main point not I do agree with that I just get pissed when I see it happening and like anything that removes it..
                                                        But as the main point is about copy right/TM and when looking at it for what it is..
                                                        It being a legal issue and not a moral one and looking at it in only that light then let the courts rule on it..

                                                        A secondary sub-point is the content theft.. Fine maybe that should be left to a dif thread.. so I will STFU about it in here...

                                                        This all said I've already posted that morally I don't agree... As I feel for the webmasters.. and would hate for it to happen to me..

                                                        But legally I do see that Shap is in his full rights to protect and enforce his TM.. I'm not him and I don't work for him so I will not even try to tell someone else what they should do with their TM... Nor try to place my morals on someone else who is doing things legally with their TM and Biz.. So I say send it to legal.. let the courts etc work it out.. or try to workout a deal...

                                                        Comment

                                                        • cess
                                                          Confirmed User
                                                          • Sep 2006
                                                          • 2921

                                                          #528
                                                          Originally posted by PAR
                                                          Right and those people can at anytime contact him and ask him for the URL's
                                                          It's still breaking the law. It makes no difference if you're just willing to give them up when someone ask, the law has been broken already.

                                                          The content theft issue makes no difference. Just because one bad webmaster will lose his domain when who knows how many legit webmasters will lose their domain doesn't some how make it right. If it was just this one domain no one would care, that's been said before more than once in this thread.

                                                          Comment

                                                          • Slappin Fish
                                                            Confirmed User
                                                            • Jul 2007
                                                            • 2512

                                                            #529
                                                            Originally posted by Shap
                                                            your post will be ignored and discounted because it doesn't support their argument.
                                                            No it will be ignored because he forgets the most important element.

                                                            You need to prove the respondent had prior knowledge of the trademark and/or registered the domain in bad faith. Without that you have nothing.

                                                            Comment

                                                            • Dodge2hot
                                                              Confirmed User
                                                              • Sep 2005
                                                              • 197

                                                              #530
                                                              Originally posted by Shap
                                                              We are open to working with everyone. We aren't out to fuck anyone over
                                                              Thats BS. If you weren't out to fuck anyone over, you wouldn't be trying to Steal people fucking domains. Your using your money to bully the smaller guy than can't afford a $1200+/hr lawyer.

                                                              Anyway you put it, you are fucking the little guys over. I can't beleive people still promote your sorry asses after all the other shit you've pulled.
                                                              Sexy N Nude

                                                              Comment

                                                              • Britceleb
                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                • Mar 2008
                                                                • 119

                                                                #531
                                                                Originally posted by Slappin Fish
                                                                No it will be ignored because he forgets the most important element.

                                                                You need to prove the respondent had prior knowledge of the trademark and/or registered the domain in bad faith. Without that you have nothing.
                                                                Who says? How can you prove someone had prior knowledge of the TM? What if I were to say I never heard of youtube.com before and I registered iyoutube.com they would have to somehow prove I had prior knowledge of it?

                                                                I have gone through this before and it can be a lengthy process. I am not agreeing with either side but from what I read Shap does have a great case IMHO

                                                                Comment

                                                                • alias
                                                                  aliasx
                                                                  • Apr 2001
                                                                  • 19010

                                                                  #532
                                                                  Fuck just bump this whore to 10k for the hell of it then let it die, hopefully other things can be laid to rest as well.. .
                                                                  https://porncorporation.com

                                                                  Comment

                                                                  • Slappin Fish
                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                    • Jul 2007
                                                                    • 2512

                                                                    #533
                                                                    Originally posted by Britceleb
                                                                    Who says? How can you prove someone had prior knowledge of the TM? What if I were to say I never heard of youtube.com before and I registered iyoutube.com they would have to somehow prove I had prior knowledge of it?

                                                                    I have gone through this before and it can be a lengthy process. I am not agreeing with either side but from what I read Shap does have a great case IMHO
                                                                    Who says? WIPO UDRP says.

                                                                    A TM does not automatically give you rights over a domain name.

                                                                    If the complainant can't prove the domain was registered in bad faith it usually doesn't go much further, look up recent arbitration decisions: arena.com ashley.com jumpro.com FullTerm.com pokerhost.net...

                                                                    I also know the process, for having been on the receiving end of a corporate bully.

                                                                    Comment

                                                                    • Shap
                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                      • May 2001
                                                                      • 8313

                                                                      #534
                                                                      Originally posted by Slappin Fish
                                                                      Who says? WIPO UDRP says.

                                                                      A TM does not automatically give you rights over a domain name.

                                                                      If the complainant can't prove the domain was registered in bad faith it usually doesn't go much further, look up recent arbitration decisions: arena.com ashley.com jumpro.com FullTerm.com pokerhost.net...

                                                                      I also know the process, for having been on the receiving end of a corporate bully.
                                                                      In a case where someone is notified that a trademark exists and they register the domain anyhow. Would you say that is in bad faith?

                                                                      Comment

                                                                      • Slappin Fish
                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                        • Jul 2007
                                                                        • 2512

                                                                        #535
                                                                        Originally posted by Shap
                                                                        In a case where someone is notified that a trademark exists and they register the domain anyhow. Would you say that is in bad faith?
                                                                        If they had prior knowledge of the complainants trademark they have no chance

                                                                        Comment

                                                                        • Brujah
                                                                          Beer Money Baron
                                                                          • Jan 2001
                                                                          • 22157

                                                                          #536
                                                                          Originally posted by Shap
                                                                          In a case where someone is notified that a trademark exists and they register the domain anyhow. Would you say that is in bad faith?
                                                                          You don't have to answer, but this has me wondering...

                                                                          How would they have been notified prior to registration of a domain? If I were going to register roughsextube.com for example a week ago before all this stuff came to light, how would you know to notify me? I probably wouldn't have even known myself that at a moments notice I would register the name. You'd have to be psychic.

                                                                          Comment

                                                                          • Killswitch - BANNED FOR LIFE

                                                                            #537
                                                                            Originally posted by Shap
                                                                            In a case where someone is notified that a trademark exists and they register the domain anyhow. Would you say that is in bad faith?
                                                                            Prove that he registered it AFTER you sent him a letter saying "Hey, I heard you were thinking of buying hardsextube.com through my guy who can read minds, don't do it, I have it trademarked.".

                                                                            Comment

                                                                            • Shap
                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                              • May 2001
                                                                              • 8313

                                                                              #538
                                                                              Originally posted by Brujah
                                                                              You don't have to answer, but this has me wondering...

                                                                              How would they have been notified prior to registration of a domain? If I were going to register roughsextube.com for example a week ago before all this stuff came to light, how would you know to notify me? I probably wouldn't have even known myself that at a moments notice I would register the name. You'd have to be psychic.
                                                                              Let's say you had brujahsextube and i notified you of our trademark? then you registered 5 more sextube domains after you received and acknowledged that email. That is what I was referring to.

                                                                              Comment

                                                                              • Voodoo
                                                                                ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠
                                                                                • Sep 2002
                                                                                • 10600

                                                                                #539
                                                                                Originally posted by Shap
                                                                                your post will be ignored and discounted because it doesn't support their argument.
                                                                                I was just simply stating and clarifying how the isolated MARK itself would be infringed on by any ___sextube.com domains, as a black & white issue. Nothing to do with prior use or domain rights.

                                                                                "I'm selflessly supporting the common good, but only coincidentally looking out for No.1."

                                                                                Comment

                                                                                • u-Bob
                                                                                  there's no $$$ in porn
                                                                                  • Jul 2005
                                                                                  • 33063

                                                                                  #540
                                                                                  Originally posted by Sands
                                                                                  I just regged essextube.com

                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                  • seeandsee
                                                                                    Check SIG!
                                                                                    • Mar 2006
                                                                                    • 50945

                                                                                    #541
                                                                                    i really think to jump form rooftop
                                                                                    BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year

                                                                                    Contact here

                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                    • polish_aristocrat
                                                                                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                                                      • Jul 2002
                                                                                      • 40377

                                                                                      #542
                                                                                      I'm watching some japanese porn on hardsextube.com now

                                                                                      http://www.hardsextube.com/video/138063/ASIAN-Hot.Jam
                                                                                      I don't use ICQ anymore.

                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                      • Ethersync
                                                                                        Confirmed User
                                                                                        • Mar 2008
                                                                                        • 5289

                                                                                        #543
                                                                                        Might as well post this here too...

                                                                                        Originally posted by Shap
                                                                                        In November 2006 we started actively using SexTube.com
                                                                                        Here is SexTube.com in November of 2006



                                                                                        Originally posted by Shap
                                                                                        In December 2006 we launched SexTube.com tube site.
                                                                                        Here is what SexTube.com looked like until mid-December of 2006.
                                                                                        "The Largest Adult DVD Download Site"

                                                                                        The best ePassporte replacement I have found: OKPAY

                                                                                        Comment

                                                                                        • Shap
                                                                                          Confirmed User
                                                                                          • May 2001
                                                                                          • 8313

                                                                                          #544
                                                                                          Ethersync I'm glad you spend your valuable time on me. Thanks. It warms my heart.

                                                                                          Comment

                                                                                          • Ethersync
                                                                                            Confirmed User
                                                                                            • Mar 2008
                                                                                            • 5289

                                                                                            #545
                                                                                            HardSexTube.com was live before you even started accepting video uploads.

                                                                                            "We have completely sold out all upload accounts. New accounts will be available soon."

                                                                                            April 2007

                                                                                            Edit: You did not accept user uploads at all in 2007...

                                                                                            Last edited by Ethersync; 03-03-2009, 03:58 PM.
                                                                                            The best ePassporte replacement I have found: OKPAY

                                                                                            Comment

                                                                                            • Shap
                                                                                              Confirmed User
                                                                                              • May 2001
                                                                                              • 8313

                                                                                              #546
                                                                                              Originally posted by Ethersync
                                                                                              HardSexTube.com was live before you even started accepting video uploads.

                                                                                              "We have completely sold out all upload accounts. New accounts will be available soon."

                                                                                              April 2007

                                                                                              Edit: You did not accept user uploads at all in 2007...
                                                                                              Your point is? Read our trademark. It is for the use of "SexTube" as an adult site.

                                                                                              Comment

                                                                                              • Ethersync
                                                                                                Confirmed User
                                                                                                • Mar 2008
                                                                                                • 5289

                                                                                                #547
                                                                                                Then in 2008 you decided to scrap the whole Tube site idea and just make the site a DVD download member site

                                                                                                The best ePassporte replacement I have found: OKPAY

                                                                                                Comment

                                                                                                • Shap
                                                                                                  Confirmed User
                                                                                                  • May 2001
                                                                                                  • 8313

                                                                                                  #548
                                                                                                  Btw Ethersync I'm just curious. You are showing me some mad love. I appreciate it. Care to let any of us know what you run?

                                                                                                  Comment

                                                                                                  • Ethersync
                                                                                                    Confirmed User
                                                                                                    • Mar 2008
                                                                                                    • 5289

                                                                                                    #549
                                                                                                    Originally posted by Shap
                                                                                                    Care to let any of us know what you run?
                                                                                                    It's immaterial.

                                                                                                    This is not personal. I'm not trolling. I sincerely think what you are trying to do is unethical.
                                                                                                    The best ePassporte replacement I have found: OKPAY

                                                                                                    Comment

                                                                                                    • Shap
                                                                                                      Confirmed User
                                                                                                      • May 2001
                                                                                                      • 8313

                                                                                                      #550
                                                                                                      12 pages. I'm going to send Eric a bill for boosting ad views this week ;)

                                                                                                      Comment

                                                                                                      Working...