it was obvious a "free" cam site with no tits out would fail
It can work - it is just a niche for girls with a very strong following.
Although none of the feeds will play for me.
They might want to have a look at that.
"Americas Hitler" JD Vance.
“There isn’t really an upside to Trump.” Tucker Carlson.
“a convicted felon rapist is now your president” OneHungLow, gfy.com
No one should have spent any time promoting them since they were only paying out 10% to affiliates, which is an insult to webmasters. If they had wanted to make a big entry splash and get the site up to sustainability with traffic they would have initially offered affiliates 30% for the first couple of months and then at least settled back to the standard 20% as Chaturbate.
“If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.”
-- Ulysses S. Grant
It can work - it is just a niche for girls with a very strong following.
Although none of the feeds will play for me.
They might want to have a look at that.
huge following or not, guys still want to see a bit of freebie, some boobs and bum before going private on these sites. If a model stays in private, rather than no free view, this can work, but then other sites are better for this
One of their biggest issues was the lack of quality cams. I was making sales on it, but then the quality was just shit. A bunch of girls were using ManyCam and it just wasn't personal. I would have put these girls on shifts to keep the site busy and then blasted it with traffic I were Chaturbate.
Who knows what it could have become. I would allow more nudity if I were them unless they train their girls to be more like LiveJasmin's who actually entice the user to spend.
Chaturbate is a very good product for a reason. They nailed it. But they need to take a different approach with Camgasm, all my own opinion.
Comment