I'm sorry... Can you point to the exact part where something illegal was done?
I scanned as many pages as I could and.... I didn't find anything of interest. At all.
Here is one of the emails the article says is "proof":
http://media.aclj.org/pdf/FBI-Securi...ch-Clinton.pdf
This is an email from a reporter to the DOJ asking if President Clinton's detail was coordinating with the security detail of Attorney General Lynch. First, this is a question from a reporter, so it's not proof of anything - it's nothing more than a reporter asking a question. Second, wouldn't the security details of two government officials coordinate with each other if they were we remotely in the same area at the same time? I mean, you wouldn't want two large groups of people with firearms to bump into each other at an airport now would you?
A second email cited as proof seems to be nothing more than the FBI asking their bosses for the proper response to the media about this meeting:
http://media.aclj.org/pdf/Clinton-Ly...ust-Called.pdf
Another email mentioned in the article is really nothing more than a list of what the press is saying about the meeting:
https://aclj.org/government-corrupti...and-illegality
All of these emails are the press asking questions about the event, and discussion after the fact. There does not seem to be any cover up, or anything arranged in advance.
All of the email chains directly mentioned in the article itself don't point to anything bad.
But you keep trying.