Is this a viable plan if Trump is removed from office?

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Matt 26z
    So Fucking Banned
    • Apr 2002
    • 18481

    #1

    Is this a viable plan if Trump is removed from office?

  • Sunny Day
    Confirmed User
    • Dec 2010
    • 1406

    #2
    Can't happen

    Originally posted by Matt 26z
    25th Amendment
    Section 2

    Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.

    No way would both houses put TRUMP back in.

    Comment

    • pimpmaster9000
      Too lazy to set a custom title
      • Dec 2011
      • 26730

      #3
      troll fail...
      Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

      Comment

      • Steve Rupe
        Confirmed User
        • Nov 2016
        • 3070

        #4
        Originally posted by Sunny Day
        25th Amendment
        Section 2

        Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.

        No way would both houses put TRUMP back in.
        In addition historically speaking the odds against the House and the Senate remaining GOP controlled in the midterms is very slim to none.

        Comment

        • Bladewire
          StraightBro
          • Aug 2003
          • 56220

          #5
          Originally posted by Matt 26z


          Skype: CallTomNow

          Comment

          • mineistaken
            See signature :)
            • Apr 2007
            • 29656

            #6
            Originally posted by Steve Rupe
            In addition historically speaking the odds against the House and the Senate remaining GOP controlled in the midterms is very slim to none.
            As for senate:

            libby la times:

            "The Democrats regaining control of the Senate, which they lost in 2014, is almost impossible to fathom."

            libby vox.com:

            "The Senate map is so mind-bogglingly awful for them that retaking the chamber in 2018 seems out of reach"

            As for house I also do not seem to find anyone predicting a sure overtaking of control.

            So remaining GOP control in both houses is most probable and not slim to none.

            Comment

            • directfiesta
              Too lazy to set a custom title
              • Oct 2002
              • 30152

              #7
              Originally posted by Matt 26z
              nothing would surprise me anymore ....
              I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

              But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

              Comment

              • NatalieK
                Natalie K
                • Apr 2010
                • 19832

                #8
                Originally posted by Sunny Day
                25th Amendment
                Section 2

                Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress.

                No way would both houses put TRUMP back in.



                and who cares anyway, another 3 years and Trump´s history anyway
                My official site / Custom vids / Make money links / First time girls
                Email: [email protected] - "Converting traffic into income since 2005"

                Comment

                • mineistaken
                  See signature :)
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 29656

                  #9
                  Originally posted by GspotProductions



                  and who cares anyway, another 3 years and Trump´s history anyway
                  7 more great years

                  Comment

                  • Bladewire
                    StraightBro
                    • Aug 2003
                    • 56220

                    #10
                    Originally posted by mineistaken
                    7 more great years
                    A Slovakian, in Slovakia, licking American POTUS Trump's wrinkly stinky hairy crinkly little balls here everyday


                    Skype: CallTomNow

                    Comment

                    • Steve Rupe
                      Confirmed User
                      • Nov 2016
                      • 3070

                      #11
                      Originally posted by mineistaken
                      As for senate:

                      libby la times:

                      "The Democrats regaining control of the Senate, which they lost in 2014, is almost impossible to fathom."

                      libby vox.com:

                      "The Senate map is so mind-bogglingly awful for them that retaking the chamber in 2018 seems out of reach"

                      As for house I also do not seem to find anyone predicting a sure overtaking of control.

                      So remaining GOP control in both houses is most probable and not slim to none.
                      I repeat what I said. Historically the party in power loses seats during mid term elections.

                      Comment

                      • Sarn
                        WW3
                        • Sep 2015
                        • 12405

                        #12
                        Originally posted by mineistaken
                        7 more great years
                        And Ivanka after, in next 8 years
                        ----

                        Comment

                        • mineistaken
                          See signature :)
                          • Apr 2007
                          • 29656

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Steve Rupe
                          I repeat what I said. Historically the party in power loses seats during mid term elections.
                          So what?

                          Lets say you have some losing basketball team. Then it gets new sponsors, huge players etc. They become contenders. And then you would come and say "historically this team proved to show bad results"? Or would you disregard that "historical" component knowing that it will be most likely broken?

                          Comment

                          • Paul Markham
                            Too old to care
                            • Jun 2001
                            • 52942

                            #14
                            Both sides want Trump out. So not going to happen.



                            Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
                            PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

                            Comment

                            • CoolMikey
                              Confirmed User
                              • Jun 2017
                              • 174

                              #15
                              Originally posted by Steve Rupe
                              I repeat what I said. Historically the party in power loses seats during mid term elections.
                              source?

                              Last couple of elections 95+% (Reelection Rates Over the Years | OpenSecrets) of house of representatives got re-elected, and currently they hold a significant 246-194 majority, so they might lose a few seats, but chances that they will lose majority are actually pretty remote.

                              That's especially considering that the democratic party has nothing going for them, no plan, no new ideas, etc, just blabbing 24/7 about "Trump", "Russia" and other nonsense that in no way makes average voter's life any better.

                              Comment

                              Working...