Trump's travel ban goes into affect

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • baddog
    So Fucking Banned
    • Apr 2001
    • 107089

    #46
    Turns out the 120 days was the suspension of the refugee program.

    Comment

    • Paul Markham
      Too old to care
      • Jun 2001
      • 52942

      #47
      Originally posted by mineistaken
      The thing is that leftards do not get this concept. Their wish is that minorities over majority in all things. They even introduced racial discrimination towards whites for god's sake.
      Delusional people.
      They're mad. The overwhelming majority support a ban so why not allow it.



      Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
      PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

      Comment

      • Paul Markham
        Too old to care
        • Jun 2001
        • 52942

        #48
        Originally posted by Paul Markham
        Why are you so glad about it doesn't cover those who can't bring needed skills, jobs or wealth?
        I will ask this question again, as people here are ignoring it.



        Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
        PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

        Comment

        • Paul Markham
          Too old to care
          • Jun 2001
          • 52942

          #49
          Originally posted by Rochard
          This is not how it works. We don't say "You are doing things wrong, but we want to support you, so we'll just let it slide".

          This is a knee jerk reaction and an attempt to quickly fulfil a campaign promise. It was improperly done. This is a complete smokescreen making it look like "We are doing something to protect America" when they aren't really doing anything. We clearly do not have a rush of Terrorists coming into the US from Syria and Iran killing Americans.
          Why isn't it to stop all migrants coming into the country who can't bring jobs, wealth or needed skills?



          Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
          PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

          Comment

          • Paul Markham
            Too old to care
            • Jun 2001
            • 52942

            #50
            Originally posted by GspotProductions
            would be funny when you travel to another country & get stopped & told you´re not welcome because you come from a place with knives & guns on your streets....


            I think it´s fucking horrible to stop people travelling to a country, another part of this world, just because where they were born.

            If this continues, I hope everyone stops travelling to the US
            It should apply to everyone who doesn't bring a skill needed, jobs or wealth.



            Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
            PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

            Comment

            • Paul Markham
              Too old to care
              • Jun 2001
              • 52942

              #51
              Originally posted by GspotProductions
              correct!

              If a terrorist wants to get in, they will & they probably are already in the US!

              This is a statement to say, the US can do what it wants & stop good people from entering, which will only create further problems, wtf is wrong with this world!

              ISIS is beginning to win
              So let in the terrorist anyway.



              Blowout deal. 880 videos, 2,400 image sets, plus many RAW videos. $500.
              PM me for a deal. Skype Paulmarkham70

              Comment

              • pimpmaster9000
                Too lazy to set a custom title
                • Dec 2011
                • 26732

                #52
                why on earth would a terrorist even consider going through this "vetting" process?

                for fucks sake LOL he can get a ticket to mexico and cross the border by foot...

                am I the only one on this board who sees the painful stupidity in the existence of a "vetting" process?...

                "oh snap there is a vetting process I will totally not try to cross the motherfucking huge boarder by foot" said no terrorist ever

                "oh look a wall I will totally not buy a 30$ rope ladder"

                for fucks sake

                Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

                Comment

                • mineistaken
                  See signature :)
                  • Apr 2007
                  • 29656

                  #53
                  Originally posted by crucifissio
                  why on earth would a terrorist even consider going through this "vetting" process?

                  for fucks sake LOL he can get a ticket to mexico and cross the border by foot...

                  am I the only one on this board who sees the painful stupidity in the existence of a "vetting" process?...

                  "oh snap there is a vetting process I will totally not try to cross the motherfucking huge boarder by foot" said no terrorist ever

                  "oh look a wall I will totally not buy a 30$ rope ladder"

                  for fucks sake

                  Nobody says that it will decrease terrorists entrances to zero. The point is that it will lower the amount by closing one of the possible entrance ways.

                  Unless you are claiming that no terrorist entered any western country legally. Which you might do being extremely dumb.

                  You can apply your ridiculous logic in many ways, one of the million examples: why do they not allow to legally buy cigarettes for minors, what is the point. As if they can not get them illegally by asking someone to buy for them.

                  Comment

                  • pimpmaster9000
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Dec 2011
                    • 26732

                    #54
                    Originally posted by mineistaken
                    Nobody says that it will decrease terrorists entrances to zero. The point is that it will lower the amount by closing one of the possible entrance ways.

                    Unless you are claiming that no terrorist entered any western country legally. Which you might do being extremely dumb.

                    You can apply your ridiculous logic in many ways, one of the million examples: why do they not allow to legally buy cigarettes for minors, what is the point. As if they can not get them illegally by asking someone to buy for them.
                    you are 100% right the terrorist will go "oh snap, cant enter legally, I totally wont try going by foot over the massive boarder because I do not want to break any laws...plans foiled"


                    meanwhile 99.999% of the "vetted" people have nothing to do with terrorism at all...the 0.001% that are terrorists are gonna try going over by foot anyway...this vetting stuff does not reduce the chances at all it actually increases them because it sends a clear message to all muslims:

                    "we will vet the shit out of you whilst bombing the crap out of your countries and future when ever we wish...be good LOL"
                    Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

                    Comment

                    • BaldBastard
                      Too lazy to set a custom title
                      • Jan 2001
                      • 16805

                      #55
                      The problem with any vetting is you stop helping those who need help the most, which is those who have lost everything, they have no ID, they have no bankbooks, they have nothing.

                      Those with all the documents available for vetting.. are not the ones who need help the most.

                      Comment

                      • 2MuchMark
                        Mark of 2Much.net
                        • Aug 2004
                        • 50966

                        #56
                        Originally posted by Joshua G
                        dumb lib you have no intellectual ground to stand on.

                        your shit-for-brains ideology opposes free speech (antifa, college riots)

                        opposes free guns. (ISIS attacks orlando gays, liberals cry about the guns)

                        opposes reasonable search & seizure (obama spying on trump via unmasking)

                        opposes the rule of law (clintons 5 immunity deals, black lives matter, sanctuary cities)

                        opposes equal protection under the law (affirmative action AKA preferential treatment for liberal groups)

                        opposes the system of checks & balances (obamas dreamers EO, paris accord)

                        & in the case of this travel ban, opposes executive authority over immigration, with liberal judges reaching for campaign rhethoric, not the constitution, to institute their bans.

                        liberal judges ignoring the constitution in favor of their own interpretation of campaign rhetoric? banana republic...

                        what the fuck do you know about the constitution dumb lib? you were too busy cutting class, smoking meth & banging another mans ass.

                        dumb lib.

                        Comment

                        • NatalieK
                          Natalie K
                          • Apr 2010
                          • 20106

                          #57
                          Originally posted by Paul Markham
                          It should apply to everyone who doesn't bring a skill needed, jobs or wealth.
                          do you know how much income comes from travel? Holidays? People without jobs, just travelling and enjoying the country....

                          this ban is ridiculous and yet ISIS are already in most countries, so it stops nothing, just good people from travelling to another country.
                          My official site Custom vids Make money & get into the businessFirst time girls
                          Skype: GspotProductions - "Converting traffic into income since 2005"

                          Comment

                          • Robbie
                            Leaner, Meaner, Faster
                            • Aug 2002
                            • 20960

                            #58
                            Originally posted by MrBaldBastard
                            The problem with any vetting is you stop helping those who need help the most, which is those who have lost everything, they have no ID, they have no bankbooks, they have nothing.

                            Those with all the documents available for vetting.. are not the ones who need help the most.
                            Another point of view on that would be:
                            Instead of spending our taxpayer's money on refugees who need help...we would instead be getting the best and brightest of other country's that would actually CONTRIBUTE to our society and economy as opposed to being wards of the state and parasitic.
                            -Robbie
                            ClaudiaMarie.Com

                            Comment

                            • directfiesta
                              Too lazy to set a custom title
                              • Oct 2002
                              • 30135

                              #59
                              Originally posted by crazies

                              Again lets Support our President of the United States and move on. Give Trump a chance and watch him make America a better place for all that are LEGALLY here.
                              Is that the same '' chance '' that was given Obama when the country was sinking ?
                              I know that Asspimple is stoopid ... As he says, it is a FACT !

                              But I can't figure out how he can breathe or type , at the same time ....

                              Comment

                              • Robbie
                                Leaner, Meaner, Faster
                                • Aug 2002
                                • 20960

                                #60
                                Originally posted by directfiesta
                                Is that the same '' chance '' that was given Obama when the country was sinking ?
                                Other than McConnell acting like a dick...Obama had a nice long "honeymoon" period with Congress.
                                And an 8 year long romance with MSNBC, CNN, NBC, CBS, ABC, The Washington Post, New York Times, and every other newspaper in America. (Chris Matthews of MSNBC famously said that Obama was the greatest orator of all times and that when Obama spoke he could feel a "thrill run down my leg")

                                No President has been attacked so viciously and so quickly as they did to Trump.
                                Trump called out the establishment during his campaign and revealed their corruption and stupidity.

                                This is "payback" from them.

                                The bad part is...it's detrimental to the very positive economic agenda of Pres. Trump. We NEED tax reform. We need jobs and better trade deals.
                                All this time being wasted on fake news witch hunts is hurting the country.
                                -Robbie
                                ClaudiaMarie.Com

                                Comment

                                Working...