Supreme Court will hear it so it goes into affect for 120 days in 72 hours.
-
-
looks like SCOTUS is unhappy liberal judges ignored the law & made rulings based on their subjective interpretation of campaign rhetoric.
liberal judges = banana republic.
dumb libs.
-
FUBAR Webmasters - The FUBAR Times - FUBAR Webmasters Mobile - FUBARTV.XXX
For promo opps contact jfk at fubarwebmasters dot comComment
-
-
And what the Supreme Court will really be looking at when it does take the case will be the separation of powers.
The question is did the lower courts act unconstitutionally by interfering with the Executive branch's power OR did they merely exercise their Judicial branch power by their actions.
That will be the question before the Court.-Robbie
ClaudiaMarie.ComComment
-
Comment
-
But it's only a 90 day ban while they "re-work the vetting process". They won't even hear arguments about the "travel ban" until after it's already over. At the same time, Trump has been in office for five months or so, and have they made any changes to the vetting process? Of course not.
I am all for common sense here, but we need to do this properly. I am all for a travel ban from people in Syria. But you cannot say "Country X has ISIS in it, thus no one from Country X can travel to the US". The Philippines has ISIS; Are we going to ban travel to and from the Philippines?Herschel Savage
Brooklyn, NYComment
-
I rushed with such a great news for quality people that I missed you already posted it
http://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...l#post21854635Comment
-
Comment
-
Comment
-
-
As expected. The court will rule he has the authority to do this, and we all move on. Sad the liberal courts disregard the Constitution and waste time with having to take it to the Supreme Court to get the obvious decision.XXXRewards - Karups - Boyfun - Jawked. Paying on time since 1997. Contact me at brent [at] xxxrewards.comComment
-
What i dont get is the fact that people tried to stop it anyway. I would see the point if he never mentioned it during the election then tried to sneak it in but he said more than once this was what im going to do and people voted for it so just get on with it. It reminds me of that guy in the Philippines i think it was ?. He said during there election he was gonna kill all the drug dealers that were destroying the country. People then voted him in and the far left were foaming at the mouth about it all. A democracy works on what the majority vote for whether we like it or not and has been this way for a long time. Its the same for workplaces who hold ballots/votes on various issues like whether to accept the companies pay rise offer etc. I have went on strike more than once when i voted against it but the majority voted for it. I accepted it and did it. I voted for Scottish independence at the time but the majority voted no. I accepted it. Just far too many people in democracies that cant accept when they get outvoted. They just can seem to let it go IMOComment
Comment