https://gfy.com/fucking-around-and-pr...l-weapons.html
In the above thread those who questioned if Assad actually used gas were accused as being pro Putin by resident GFY leftards. And that was only for QUESTIONING the fact.
Ron Paul goess EVEN FURTHER, saying it was ZERO CHANCE:
If QUESTIONING this seemingly illogical attack is labeled as being pro Putin (by ad hominem leftards), how would you call ZERO CHANCE statement? Ron Paul must be Putin himself...
Ps: Trump said he do not see much issues with Assad, so Assad decided to gas attack some irrelevant village not even close to front lines. Well, because Assad decided that Trump not having issue with him is no good... Seems logical
Pps: I do not claim for certain Assad is not responsible, I am merely invoking thinking VS taking thing from official MSM narrative (and of couse "Assad certainly did it because he is supported byu Putin" logic...).