CARTOON characters are people too, a judge has ruled in the case of a man convicted over cartoons based on The Simpsons, in which children are shown having sex.
Man loses appeal over cartoon porn based on The Simpsons
Collapse
X
-
i hate when people use CP charges for dumb ass shit like this
those charges should be for people who are actually hurting kids, not some dude drawing bart banging lisa
if anything that would be obscene or something like that, but i dont think they should be using the same laws that protect kids to protect cartoons or it makes those laws look dumbComment
-
Just be glad it was in a sane country where judges dont have huge egos because in the US he would have got more time than a convicted rapist.No doubt one may quote history to support any cause, as the devil quotes scripture.
-- Learned Hand
http://www.bjpenn.comComment
-
-
-
Online strip gaming with sexy gamer girls
Best thing I ever signed up for: Quality Razors, Cheap PriceComment
-
so lets see it, someone post the pics
Custom Software Development, email: woj#at#wojfun#.#com to discuss details or skype: wojl2000 or gchat: wojfun or telegram: wojl2000
Affiliate program tools: Hosted Galleries Manager Banner Manager Video Manager
Wordpress Affiliate Plugin Pic/Movie of the Day Fansign Generator Zip ManagerComment
-
If he was in the US it would be legal. Well it would still be copyright infringement but not CP.
I wonder so if an atrist draws a cartoon character killing another cartoon character can he be charged with murder? I mean since cartoons are people and all.Comment
-
That begs the question if you met a woman who is say 35 but has a disease that not only makes he the size of a child, but makes her look like say a 13 year old. Are you a pedo even if you know her real age? If so then she can never be with anyone except 13 year olds, which ironically would make her the pedo.Comment
-
Actually it would probably be parody and not copyright infringement. If he used the Simpson's name, probably trademark infringement though.If he was in the US it would be legal. Well it would still be copyright infringement but not CP.
On the original subject, this case makes the US courts look downright liberal -- until you hear about the teenage girl being prosecuted for CP for taking naked cell phone pics of herself and sharing it with her friends. If she would have just flashed them, she would probably be okay.Comment
-
-
-
And webmasters from European Union countries. According to Council framework Decision 2004/68/JHA of 22 December 2003 - http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/...4F0068:EN:HTML
cp is
(iii) realistic images of a non-existent child involved or engaged in the conduct mentioned in (i);
Most countries when implementing this decision to their code of law drop word "realistic"Comment



BUY MY SIG - 50$/Year
Comment