-
Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here -
oh it was SO important that these guys have democracy LOL definitely worth the millions dead etc...
the US army aint no joke...its black humor
Report a suspicious cracker: Click HereComment
-
My father died in Vietnam when I was nine months old, so I am well aware of the deaths involved.
The United States never really lost a battle in Vietnam. However, there was very little public support for the war with the American public. The politicians didn't allow the military to do what it needed to do. At a certain point we had a choice between going all out or walking away, and the politicians decided it was time to get out.Herschel Savage
Brooklyn, NYComment
-
@rochard;
I'm sorry your dad died along with some of my friends, my friends brothers and my teacher's son in the war.
I am sorry they died fighting a fight that was not really theirs to fight.
That was so long ago but it still saddens me.Comment
-
Sure. That's why the free version has almost 50 thousand downloads at wordpress.org and why almost everybody here uses the commercial one. Must be because I'm such a moron in history and in programming too
I really can't understand how you guys can be so brainwashed. How you heard something about Internet? Maybe somebody told you that any kind of information is freely available there, or pornhub is the only site you are familiar with? This is Vietnam:
I won't post more images here, because they are really TERRIBLE. Is this something you have to be proud for your army? Burning kids with napalm? Oh these brave soldiers were such heroes.
This is the invasion into Russian Crimea (yes that's brutal and merciless invasion you are so worried about):
These are not staged Hollywood movies. This is a documentary. Feel the difference?Obey the CowgodComment
-
good jokes:
"america is the leader of the free world"
"thank you for your service!"
"protecting america"
"stolenvalor.com"
always amusing to see USIS supporters say stuff
Report a suspicious cracker: Click HereComment
-
And nobody has died, because our catapulting systems have always been top-notch
This is what happened during the failure of the space rocket engine. Watch it at 2:50 (that's an unique documentary footage):
The cosmonauts were ejected in the capsule and have survived.
As you may know, Russia did most of space launches in the human history (two times more than the USA) and lost only 4 cosmonauts in two accidents. In both cases the people have died during the landing: determination of the capsule and a failure of parachute system. No single cosmonaut has died during the rocket launch so far.
In contrast to Russia, the United States have no technologies to equip their rockets with life saving systems. Thus in case of failure the astronauts are doomed and they have no single hope to be saved...
Don't think that I'm trying to make fun of this tragedy or so. No way! I'm just showing you that the real US technologies and not the same as the ones shown in your countless movies. They are too overpriced far not the best ones in the world like Hollywood tries to show it... You were the 2nd in the space and only because Nazi genius like Von Braun have done all the job for you. Today Von Braun is dead and the Russian rocket technologies is the only way to send your astronauts to the outer space.Obey the CowgodComment
-
USSR red army tanks graveyard, east of Kabul, Afghanistan
USSR red army tanks graveyard, east of Kabul, Afghanistan
| .Afghanistan, Tank, Vehicle Graveyard
USSR red army tanks graveyard? few km east of Kabul, Afghanistan
When Russia left Afghanistan after the war, a lot of their equipment was left behind.
Left in a hurry --did you?
Forgot your fallen?
Comment
-
I didn't get that. What did you try to say? That's a graveyard of used vehicles. Haven't you heard about similar graveyards in former ex-Soviet republics?
This is Russia and Ukraine for example:
So what? Maybe Taliban will find a cheaper way to utilize those rusty old tanks, because nobody here wants to spend a ruble to recycle that junk. At least now it's a problem of the new Afghan government - not ours.
Forget it. This super-duper technology will make America great again:
Obey the CowgodComment
-
Of course he knows why his father died just as I do.
"I, (state name of enlistee), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God."Comment
-
-
So the US Constitution has sent him to that war? The Constitution told the US army to burn Vietnamese kids with napalm? I have already posted this link above: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/My_Lai_Massacre
Who did that to the kids? Who has raped and killed them? Some mad animals or the brave US soldiers? What for???Obey the CowgodComment
-
You either are apparently ignorant about the US Constitution and the US political system or are just a troll. I suspect that you are alittle of both. Being that the US is a Republic, the US Constution provides for the election of people to represent them in governance of the country, which includes the President of the country. It was the elected representatives of the people that made the decision to engage our military, specifically upon the orders of the President of the US who is the ultimate Commander in Chief of US military forces.
Civilians micro manage the US military, which said management includes when to engage , where to engage and how long to engage our military forces. It also includes target selection, rules of engagement, and the goals of the engagement, the type of weapons that may be used during the engagement etc. etc. etc.Comment
-
When I was a kid, I had a schoolmate who has made a laser. It was in 80's of the past century. I mean he made it from the scratch - no Chinese light pointers or DVD burner components. He as made it of polystyrol. That toy was able to easily blow up the balloons. I bet it was about 100 million times chepar than the one on video
BTW, a friend of my son has made a handheld rail-gun like in Quake. Course it was unable to sink a battle cruiser, but I believe it was able to easily put down a quadrocopter drone and it was enough to deserve a prize on physics in the school ;) Maybe he should send it to the US Army
As we say here, everything new is a well forgotten old one:
Go Google for 1К17
Obey the CowgodComment
-
Skype: CallTomNow
Comment
-
Obey the CowgodComment
-
My father died because he believed in a higher cause, and supported our government. At the time, our government believed it was in our best interests to prevent Vietnam from becoming Communist. You can argue this was a valid goal, although you would have to take a long look at the history of Vietnam to have a proper discussion.
What happened with Vietnam had a massive effect on our society here in the United States. Our military and the support for our military was at it's lowest point ever both from a moral standpoint as well as fighting ability. The general population hated the government, the politicians, and the military. The military itself had crumbled; Officers had no control over the men in their unit and were afraid to enter the barracks. There is a great book about this called the Long Gray Line - It details the Army West Point Class of 1966, their training, Vietnam, and the aftermath and how it effected their lives.
Our military has changed a lot since then. Take a good look at what happened in Iraq - twice. To put it in perspective, The Iraq - Iran war lasted eight years, hundreds of thousands died, and it ended in a stalemate. The United States went in and destroyed the Iranian military and their government in weeks.
Something very similar happened with the Soviet Union with Afghanistan. (I don't know much about it but I just ordered a book off of Amazon.)
It's difficult to compare the Russian military to the American military. Russia doesn't even have a blue water navy. It's only aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov, isn't nuclear powered, and recently sailed around Europe to the Mediterranean which was, well, comical. The only aircraft carrier is in such poor shape it had to be freaking towed to Syria.
Herschel Savage
Brooklyn, NYComment
-
I read that book years ago and it is well written and informative in multiple ways. I can't recall the name of the Cadet but he was the most gung ho of all of the Cadet's in the class and when he was in Vietnam he became so disillusioned with the war and the way it was being fought, he was Court Martialed, if my memory serves me well, for disobeying orders given to him by a Major who was in a chopper above him. He did not want to see anymore of his men get wasted so he refused to reengage them in a battle as he was ordered to do. If I recall correctly his men and he had been engaged for several days, were suffering with lack of sleep, very low on ammo, water, food etc. Had already lost alot of men, were heading for an extraction point, when this Major ordered them to turn back and engage a unit that was following them. He refused this order.My father died because he believed in a higher cause, and supported our government. At the time, our government believed it was in our best interests to prevent Vietnam from becoming Communist. You can argue this was a valid goal, although you would have to take a long look at the history of Vietnam to have a proper discussion.
What happened with Vietnam had a massive effect on our society here in the United States. Our military and the support for our military was at it's lowest point ever both from a moral standpoint as well as fighting ability. The general population hated the government, the politicians, and the military. The military itself had crumbled; Officers had no control over the men in their unit and were afraid to enter the barracks. There is a great book about this called the Long Gray Line - It details the Army West Point Class of 1966, their training, Vietnam, and the aftermath and how it effected their lives.
Our military has changed a lot since then. Take a good look at what happened in Iraq - twice. To put it in perspective, The Iraq - Iran war lasted eight years, hundreds of thousands died, and it ended in a stalemate. The United States went in and destroyed the Iranian military and their government in weeks.
Something very similar happened with the Soviet Union with Afghanistan. (I don't know much about it but I just ordered a book off of Amazon.)
It's difficult to compare the Russian military to the American military. Russia doesn't even have a blue water navy. It's only aircraft carrier, the Admiral Kuznetsov, isn't nuclear powered, and recently sailed around Europe to the Mediterranean which was, well, comical. The only aircraft carrier is in such poor shape it had to be freaking towed to Syria.
Comment
-
What century do you live in? Do you really think that there will be Midway-style sea battles in 21st century? Like two aircraft carriers against each other? Why not swordsmen and archers then? Just imagine the US dragoons vs Russian musketeers on horses. What a battle could it be, ah?!
Man, the anti-ship missiles were invented a long time ago. Surprised? One cruise missile is 1000000's times cheaper than an aircraft carrier, but it's much more effective. There will be no Kamikazes or anything like that. It will be as simple, as cheap and as effective as this:
I have no idea why Putin has decided to take the rusty and half-dead Admiral Kuznetsov to Syria. I think the old man has a senility. The aircraft carriers are dinosaurs nowadays - they are just a joke. Nobody will use them in a real war, because they will be sunk in the first minutes of any military conflict.
In fact it will be a bit worse, because according to the Russian military doctrine, the tactical nuke warheads will be used against the enemy aircraft carriers. One small tactical nuke of 500 kilotons exploded about 100-200 meters above the entire battle group will do the trick. E.g. SS-N-19 "Shipwreck" or SS-N-27 "Sizzler". They are cheap, fast and have about 2000-2500 tactical range (can be launched from planes, ships and submarines).Obey the CowgodComment
-
Quite a display of ignorance on your part. You are not a tactition if you cannot see the need for aircraft carriers and seem to be ignorant of strategic consequences of using nukes in any scenario.What century do you live in? Do you really think that there will be Midway-style sea battles in 21st century? Like two aircraft carriers against each other? Why not swordsmen and archers then? Just imagine the US dragoons vs Russian musketeers on horses. What a battle could it be, ah?!
Man, the anti-ship missiles were invented a long time ago. Surprised? One cruise missile is 1000000's times cheaper than an aircraft carrier, but it's much more effective. There will be no Kamikazes or anything like that. It will be as simple, as cheap and as effective as this:
I have no idea why Putin has decided to take the rusty and half-dead Admiral Kuznetsov to Syria. I think the old man has a senility. The aircraft carriers are dinosaurs nowadays - they are just a joke. Nobody will use them in a real war, because they will be sunk in the first minutes of any military conflict.
In fact it will be a bit worse, because according to the Russian military doctrine, the tactical nuke warheads will be used against the enemy aircraft carriers. One small tactical nuke of 50 kilotons exploded about 100-200 meters above the entire battle group will do the trick.Comment
-
Quite a display of ignorance on your part. You are not a tactition if you cannot see the need for aircraft carriers and seem to be ignorant of strategic consequences of using nukes in any scenario.What century do you live in? Do you really think that there will be Midway-style sea battles in 21st century? Like two aircraft carriers against each other? Why not swordsmen and archers then? Just imagine the US dragoons vs Russian musketeers on horses. What a battle could it be, ah?!
Man, the anti-ship missiles were invented a long time ago. Surprised? One cruise missile is 1000000's times cheaper than an aircraft carrier, but it's much more effective. There will be no Kamikazes or anything like that. It will be as simple, as cheap and as effective as this:
I have no idea why Putin has decided to take the rusty and half-dead Admiral Kuznetsov to Syria. I think the old man has a senility. The aircraft carriers are dinosaurs nowadays - they are just a joke. Nobody will use them in a real war, because they will be sunk in the first minutes of any military conflict.
In fact it will be a bit worse, because according to the Russian military doctrine, the tactical nuke warheads will be used against the enemy aircraft carriers. One small tactical nuke of 50 kilotons exploded about 100-200 meters above the entire battle group will do the trick.Comment
-
Which country it could be used against? Somalia? Sorry but I don't think that the US taxpayers will be happy to know that it absolutely useless against other armies because they have the modern anti-ship cruise missiles and tactical nukes. China, India, Iran and even Pakistan can sink it in minutes. What is the reason to spend such a big money to it?Obey the CowgodComment
-
Your missiles fail like your aircraft carriers
Which country it could be used against? Somalia? Sorry but I don't think that the US taxpayers will be happy to know that it absolutely useless against other armies because they have the modern anti-ship cruise missiles and tactical nukes. China, India, Iran and even Pakistan can sink it in minutes. What is the reason to spend such a big money to it?
Skype: CallTomNow
Comment
-
Looks like fun
How many US astronauts were not delivered to the outer space by Russian rockets? What's about the Curiosity rover? ;) Do you really think they won't be able to deliver a nuke when needed? ;)
The mobile ICBM nuke launcher sends a commercial satellite to the orbit:
Note the time it needs to prepare for the launch and to send a spaceship to the outer space. Enjoy
Obey the CowgodComment
-
reality:
serbs shoot down US stealh fighter with old russian missle from the 60's
we gave away all the downed tech to russians and chineese no worries
Report a suspicious cracker: Click HereComment
-
Obey the CowgodComment
-
So you honestly think Russia will win the war against The United States of America?
(again, I love Russian people this is not about them)
Skype: CallTomNow
Comment
-
ZiggiZiggiCrew
Hi-End Exclusive Content From Russia Since 1999
telegramm: @VP1963 e-mail: [email protected] skype: panvlmComment
-
ZiggiZiggiCrew
Hi-End Exclusive Content From Russia Since 1999
telegramm: @VP1963 e-mail: [email protected] skype: panvlmComment
-
>Something very similar happened with the Soviet Union with Afghanistan. (I don't know much about it but I just ordered a book off of Amazon.)
Pakistan imported weapons and partisan. And during 10 years = 10 000 dies
----Comment
-
No. But only because no one else has aircraft carriers.
Well, Russia has one. But isn't nuclear powered, and couldn't even make it around Europe to the Mediterranean without refueling and without breaking down. China also has an aircraft carrier, which they bought from Russia, but that is not even functioning.Herschel Savage
Brooklyn, NYComment
-
US army: bla bla bla bla!
Pooty: fuck off or I launch!
US army: sir yes sir so sorry sir we are fucking off right away!
Pooty: and suck dicks while you are running away!
US army: gargle gargle gargle!
its amusing that americans think they can take on russia with a few ships tho
Report a suspicious cracker: Click HereComment
-
Trump is more maniacal and egocentric than Putin, he'll push harder than any president so far because Putin will inevitably lie to him and fuck him over, like Putin does all agreements, this is why he has so many problems around the world.US army: bla bla bla bla!
Pooty: fuck off or I launch!
US army: sir yes sir so sorry sir we are fucking off right away!
Pooty: and suck dicks while you are running away!
US army: gargle gargle gargle!
its amusing that americans think they can take on russia with a few ships tho
Skype: CallTomNow
Comment
-
-
Russia make robot for space traveling(around moon)
???? ????????: ??????? ????????: "?????" ?????????? ? ????? ????----Comment
-
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_..._in_Yugoslavia
On 6 April 1941 the Kingdom of Yugoslavia was invaded ..
The invasion lasted little more than ten days, ending with the unconditional surrender of the Royal Yugoslav Army on 17 April.
Here is a list of wars won by Serbs
Serbian War History Book as taught in school..
Sponsored by ...
Comment
Comment