Obama orders 'full review' of 2016 election hacking

BREAKING.
CIA: "Iraq has weapons of mass destruction, war justified."

I'm a Blue Dog Democrat now, I used to be a Rockefeller Republican, I'm fiscally conservative. Everyone Trump has appointed is pro multi-national corporate welfare, which will drain our system. I'm glad he's building up our military and gearing up for a fight.

We'll see how things turnout, he lies so much it's hard to really tell what we're in for but its not looking good for our country financially.

AWESOME!!!!!!

What a great, great day for America and the world it could be.


It looks like they really were involved:

Check this out, by the Washington Post no less:
https://www.washingtonpost.com/world...=.e56af92fe0e0

And to no surprise, Donald Trump is having a meltdown and calling out the CIA (LOL!!)
Donald Trump takes aim at US intel on Russia - CNNPolitics.com

What would happen if all of this turns out to be true? If Russia was shown to have hacked the election and worked with Trump to get him elected. Would Trump be automaticall disqualified from being Prez? Or would he have to be impeached? Would Pence take over, or would there be another election? I'm sure all of this is unheard of in US politics, but just wondering if you knew anyway.


No that's not right. Democracy lets Obama launch an investigation, the same way it lets Trump say everything he says. And, it was democracy that allowed Trump to get this far. But now since there are so many questions, the democratic process must be allowed to continue so that those questions can be answered.




Why? Trump claimed the election was rigged before he won, and again after he won. I don't know if a recount would hurt him. Maybe yes, maybe no. As a true-blue American yourself, what do you have against a recount? Isn't this democracy?

I didn't say anything; I asked you a question. I thought you were fluent in English.

Obviously you don't understand what gerrymandering is. When did states have their boundaries realigned?

50 hacks ...
Message to the *red-hats*.

They swallow any shit "fearless leader" flushes down their little mouths.

The Democrat Senators on the Senate Intelligence Committee sent President Obama a signed letter asking that the report's details be declassified and released to the public. I would like to see them -- wouldn't you?

What political party gerrymanders to weaken the minority vote? Republicans

For your graph to be relevant each state would have to have their own EC and not base their results on the popular vote.

Not one works that way

Take your complaint to Wikipedia, it's their graph https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerr..._United_States

Evidently there's a conspiracy by Wikipedia to misinform the public on the basics of our political system.

It looks like liberals will never move past the denial phase, which is ok by me. Fuckin' crybabies won't win another national election for decades. Hope they run a gay muslim next election.


.

I would for sure. And so should every freedom-loving American.




No.

The CIA released an summary on Saddam Hussein's chemical and biological weapons programs in 2002, 9 months before the invasion of Iraq.

An expurgated version was released in 2004, but the full version wasn't available to the public until 2009. The CIA said:

"Iraq probably has renovated a [vaccine] production plant" to manufacture biological weapons "but we are unable to determine whether [biological weapons] agent research has resumed." The NIE also said Hussein did not have "sufficient material" to manufacture any nuclear weapons and "the information we have on Iraqi nuclear personnel does not appear consistent with a coherent effort to reconstitute a nuclear weapons program."

The CIA told the truth.

Read more at
Here's the full version of the CIA's 2002 intelligence assessment on WMD in Iraq - Business Insider and https://news.vice.com/article/the-ci...-iraq-invasion

peace.

Vano, this isn't a "liberal" thing anymore. I don't think anyone should dismiss this topic. It's pretty damn important.

That's for local stuff you idiot.

Yeah Crockett said "That shows, that gerrymandering is what "won" the EC. Meaning a rigged system at state level in a handful of states changed the outcome of the election."

So I posted a graphic to explain to you gerrymandering because you were confused as to how it impacted presidential elections.

The GOP gerrymandered local elections to imppact congressional districts and win the 201y election without popular vote.

Here's a story written about their plan in April 2015 GOP Plots to Win 2016 Presidency Without a Majority Popular Vote. It's basically stealing power against the will of the majority.

I agree, if there was some kind of hacking or influence from Russia that may have affected the election, it needs to be looked into so we can see just what happened and keep it from happening again.