GoFuckYourself.com - Adult Webmaster Forum - View Single Post

plaster · 10-13-2016, 02:43 PM

I would like to summarize what I think those emails are suggesting:

1) Brent from webtv.net (which is inaccessible online by any means currently) works for the Clintons. He's a reporter for whoever and writes articles to praise the clintons. I'm no journalistic expert but I think that's a conflict of interest.
2) Brent sends panic email to John Podesta in that he highights:
- Soros hates Obama and the rumor is floating.
- Secretary of state, Presidents and Presidential Candidates should not be talking so much with a low life like Sid Blumenthal.

Who's Sid?? Welp, he's the guy that Hillary paid to give them intel in Libya. However, this is not standard protocol. The reason for this first hand intel is to gain access to foreign business deals to line the Clinton Foundation pockets. It is also suggested that Hillary's lack of following government procedures is a direct result of the tragedy in Benghazi.

Better read this article to highlight it better:
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/19/us...ness.html?_r=0

That is the article that Brent was referring to when scolding the NYT's reporter in the first email. A section of that article for NYT is as follows:

The emails suggest that Mr. Blumenthal?s direct line to Mrs. Clinton circumvented the elaborate procedures established by the federal government to ensure that high-level officials are provided with vetted assessments of available intelligence.

Former intelligence officials said it was not uncommon for top officials, including secretaries of state, to look outside the intelligence bureaucracy for information and advice. But Paul R. Pillar, a former C.I.A. official who is now a researcher at the Center for Security Studies at Georgetown University, said Mr. Blumenthal?s dispatches went beyond that sort of informal channel, aping the style of official government intelligence reports but without assessments of the motives of sources.

?The sourcing is pretty sloppy,? Mr. Pillar added, ?in a way that would never pass muster if it were the work of a reports officer at a U.S. intelligence agency.?

.... and 4 people dead. Oh wait... it's not Hillary's fault, nevermind.

10-13-2016, 02:43 PM
plaster So Fucking Banned Industry Role: Join Date: Apr 2015 Posts: 2,295	I would like to summarize what I think those emails are suggesting: 1) Brent from webtv.net (which is inaccessible online by any means currently) works for the Clintons. He's a reporter for whoever and writes articles to praise the clintons. I'm no journalistic expert but I think that's a conflict of interest. 2) Brent sends panic email to John Podesta in that he highights: - Soros hates Obama and the rumor is floating. - Secretary of state, Presidents and Presidential Candidates should not be talking so much with a low life like Sid Blumenthal. Who's Sid?? Welp, he's the guy that Hillary paid to give them intel in Libya. However, this is not standard protocol. The reason for this first hand intel is to gain access to foreign business deals to line the Clinton Foundation pockets. It is also suggested that Hillary's lack of following government procedures is a direct result of the tragedy in Benghazi. Better read this article to highlight it better: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/05/19/us...ness.html?_r=0 That is the article that Brent was referring to when scolding the NYT's reporter in the first email. A section of that article for NYT is as follows: The emails suggest that Mr. Blumenthal?s direct line to Mrs. Clinton circumvented the elaborate procedures established by the federal government to ensure that high-level officials are provided with vetted assessments of available intelligence. Former intelligence officials said it was not uncommon for top officials, including secretaries of state, to look outside the intelligence bureaucracy for information and advice. But Paul R. Pillar, a former C.I.A. official who is now a researcher at the Center for Security Studies at Georgetown University, said Mr. Blumenthal?s dispatches went beyond that sort of informal channel, aping the style of official government intelligence reports but without assessments of the motives of sources. ?The sourcing is pretty sloppy,? Mr. Pillar added, ?in a way that would never pass muster if it were the work of a reports officer at a U.S. intelligence agency.? .... and 4 people dead. Oh wait... it's not Hillary's fault, nevermind.