Clinton: US should use 'military response' to fight cyberattacks from Russia and China

Collapse
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Sarn
    WW3
    • Sep 2015
    • 12405

    #1

    Clinton: US should use 'military response' to fight cyberattacks from Russia and China

    Clinton: US should use 'military response' to fight cyberattacks from Russia and China

    "As President, I will make it clear that the United States will treat cyberattacks just like any other attack. We will be ready with serious political, economic, and military responses," she told the attendees, largely made up of veterans and their supporters.

    "We are going to invest in protecting our governmental networks and our national infrastructure," she continued. "I want us to lead the world in setting the rules in cyberspace. If America doesn't, others will."
    Hillary Clinton: US should use 'military response' to combat Russia and China cyberattacks
    ----
  • plaster
    So Fucking Banned
    • Apr 2015
    • 2295

    #2
    I think we should stuff hillary in a rocket and fire that rocket at Russia and film it.

    Comment

    • Sarn
      WW3
      • Sep 2015
      • 12405

      #3
      miss world war3

      - dad why start world war 3?
      - because mail server will be hacked
      ----

      Comment

      • just a punk
        So fuckin' bored
        • Jun 2003
        • 32385

        #4
        Her rockets do not fly (that's why Americans use the Russian space technologies), her army if overpaid and completely useless (no balls to fuck even with the barbarian North Korean armed forces). Now she has found out that her hackers can not defeat Russian and Chinese ones. She's so pathetic...
        Obey the Cowgod

        Comment

        • nico-t
          emperor of my world
          • Aug 2004
          • 29901

          #5
          mind blowing that so many libbies support this warlord. Completely the opposite of what their beliefs are.

          Comment

          • just a punk
            So fuckin' bored
            • Jun 2003
            • 32385

            #6
            Originally posted by nico-t
            mind blowing that so many libbies support this warlord. Completely the opposite of what their beliefs are.
            A stupid bitch doesn't realize that her "military response" will end up like this for the whole planet Earth:



            I know he has a brain damage and she's ready to die, but does she understand that her children and grandchildren will be burned alive?

            Both countries have some good movies about our nearest future:



            Obey the Cowgod

            Comment

            • Barry-xlovecam
              It's 42
              • Jun 2010
              • 18083

              #7
              1.) Better computer security.
              2.) NSA should return the same type of cyberattack.

              Cyber war is cyber war ...

              That should be national policy.

              Comment

              • Sarn
                WW3
                • Sep 2015
                • 12405

                #8
                Originally posted by Barry-xlovecam
                1.) Better computer security.
                2.) NSA should return the same type of cyberattack.

                Cyber war is cyber war ...

                That should be national policy.
                it is not are cyber war.
                if she use gmail for send secret informations - this negligence.
                if she like warlord ignore secure alert from benghazi and others embassies - this negligence.
                and after she not take responsibility - blame all around.
                ----

                Comment

                • beerptrol
                  Confirmed Asshole
                  • Feb 2003
                  • 12722

                  #9
                  There's as much chance of her using military force on cyberattackers as there is of Mexico paying for the wall. Keep sucking that Trump cock
                  like most matters of national security it's an option that is on the table. If she would have left it out you'd be bitching on how weak she is
                  “If we are to have another contest in the near future of our national existence, I predict that the dividing line will not be Mason and Dixon's but between patriotism and intelligence on the one side, and superstition, ambition and ignorance on the other.”
                  -- Ulysses S. Grant

                  Comment

                  • pimpmaster9000
                    Too lazy to set a custom title
                    • Dec 2011
                    • 26730

                    #10
                    meanwhile the US government will spy on everybody, including its allies, and bitch about others doing the same
                    Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

                    Comment

                    • Barry-xlovecam
                      It's 42
                      • Jun 2010
                      • 18083

                      #11
                      I see no problem with the US government hacking into foreign government or civillian computer systems * military or civilian * when that government or a private organization in that nation is sourced as the initiator of breaches of US computer systems. Inflicting maximum real damage should be the objective.

                      The USA is more than capable of launching cyber warfare. Shutting down an cybertacker's electric grid and sewer and water system is not out of bounds. You play fucky-fuck to win.

                      Of course, the USA cannot do this now because the computer systems in the USA are not very secure -- this will have to change regardless of who sits as president. So, take that partisan politic shit and shove it back up your ass.

                      Comment

                      • Phoenix
                        BACON BACON BACON
                        • Nov 2002
                        • 35475

                        #12
                        clintons wife can't even keep her email secure and she is the one saying war for cyber attacks?

                        lol

                        why is this lady even allowed to do anything
                        Telegram PhoenixBrad
                        https://quantads.io

                        Comment

                        • Adnium_Ivana
                          Confirmed User
                          • Jun 2016
                          • 1094

                          #13
                          Originally posted by Sarn
                          Clinton: US should use 'military response' to fight cyberattacks from Russia and China

                          "As President, I will make it clear that the United States will treat cyberattacks just like any other attack. We will be ready with serious political, economic, and military responses," she told the attendees, largely made up of veterans and their supporters.

                          "We are going to invest in protecting our governmental networks and our national infrastructure," she continued. "I want us to lead the world in setting the rules in cyberspace. If America doesn't, others will."
                          Hillary Clinton: US should use 'military response' to combat Russia and China cyberattacks
                          She should make a cybercrimes dept...and make Edward Snowden & Julian Assange run it

                          Skype - ivana.gsmi
                          Email - [email protected]
                          [URL="https://adnium.com/ref/3168"]

                          Comment

                          • 2MuchMark
                            Mark of 2Much.net
                            • Aug 2004
                            • 50931

                            #14
                            Originally posted by CyberSEO
                            A stupid bitch doesn't realize that her "military response" will end up like this for the whole planet Earth:
                            I agree - very stupid thing for her to say.

                            Question for movie buffs:

                            Originally posted by CyberSEO
                            (Fast-Forward to the 55:00 marker)

                            While this movie is full of melodrama and contains some cheesy vfx, the nuclear war scene is still scary as fuck to me. I've seen movies featuring other nukes and destruction of cities but the scene in The Day After always stands out. Any idea how and why? The VFX are bad (even by 1980's standards), so why does it work? Editing? Sound perhaps? Chills...

                            Comment

                            • Relic
                              So Fucking Banned
                              • Aug 2002
                              • 10294

                              #15
                              Originally posted by MarkPrince

                              Question for movie buffs:



                              (Fast-Forward to the 55:00 marker)
                              .

                              I'll do no such thing you bbc loving cuck.

                              Comment

                              • ZiggiZiggiCrew
                                Confirmed User
                                • Dec 2012
                                • 3175

                                #16
                                Hmmmmm...Romanian taxi driver ?Guccifer? hack her post box and got 52 months in prison for this
                                Romanian hacker "Guccifer" sentenced - CBS News
                                But Putin is bad ass again?
                                Is she used *1111* as the password?

                                Btw, Pussy Riot got 2 years in prison for anti-Putin dance in Main Orthodox Church of Russia. Пездец тогда пуканы рвались у местных либералов. А на румына всем пох
                                ZiggiZiggiCrew
                                Hi-End Exclusive Content From Russia Since 1999
                                telegramm: @VP1963 e-mail: [email protected] skype: panvlm

                                Comment

                                • just a punk
                                  So fuckin' bored
                                  • Jun 2003
                                  • 32385

                                  #17
                                  Originally posted by MarkPrince
                                  I agree - very stupid thing for her to say.

                                  Question for movie buffs:



                                  (Fast-Forward to the 55:00 marker)

                                  While this movie is full of melodrama and contains some cheesy vfx, the nuclear war scene is still scary as fuck to me. I've seen movies featuring other nukes and destruction of cities but the scene in The Day After always stands out. Any idea how and why? The VFX are bad (even by 1980's standards), so why does it work? Editing? Sound perhaps? Chills...
                                  I don't know either. I've seen this movie on TV in early 80's when I was a kid. I don't remember the plot, but I still remember some scenes that have impressed me, such as the EMI effect and the ending scenes of the movie, which were so non-Hollywood ones. They were very typical for Russian cinematography.

                                  Originally posted by ZiggiZiggiCrew
                                  Btw, Pussy Riot got 2 years in prison for anti-Putin dance in Main Orthodox Church of Russia. Пездец тогда пуканы рвались у местных либералов. А на румына всем пох
                                  Ты путаешь теплое с квадратным. Одно дело политзаключенные, другое - обычный уголовник.
                                  Obey the Cowgod

                                  Comment

                                  • crockett
                                    in a van by the river
                                    • May 2003
                                    • 76818

                                    #18
                                    Hillary is a 1980s Republican Neocon.. I've said that a long time. Obama was to the right of Reagan on many issues and Hillary is even further to the right.

                                    It's one of the reasons I don't like her.. even still she is a better option than the idiot Trump.
                                    In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                                    Comment

                                    • just a punk
                                      So fuckin' bored
                                      • Jun 2003
                                      • 32385

                                      #19
                                      Originally posted by crockett
                                      Hillary is a 1980s Republican Neocon.. I've said that a long time. Obama was to the right of Reagan on many issues and Hillary is even further to the right.

                                      It's one of the reasons I don't like her.. even still she is a better option than the idiot Trump.
                                      In the USA even an imbecile can rule the country:

                                      Obey the Cowgod

                                      Comment

                                      • Rochard
                                        Jägermeister Test Pilot
                                        • Dec 2001
                                        • 75733

                                        #20
                                        Originally posted by Phoenix
                                        clintons wife can't even keep her email secure and she is the one saying war for cyber attacks?
                                        Seems her email system in her basement was more secure than the email system at the White House....
                                        Herschel Savage
                                        Brooklyn, NY

                                        Comment

                                        • Jigster715
                                          So Fucking Banned
                                          • Jul 2015
                                          • 1459

                                          #21
                                          Originally posted by Sarn
                                          it is not are cyber war.
                                          if she use gmail for send secret informations - this negligence.
                                          if she like warlord ignore secure alert from benghazi and others embassies - this negligence.
                                          and after she not take responsibility - blame all around.
                                          QFFT - Quoted for fuckin truth!

                                          Comment

                                          • Rochard
                                            Jägermeister Test Pilot
                                            • Dec 2001
                                            • 75733

                                            #22
                                            Originally posted by beerptrol
                                            There's as much chance of her using military force on cyberattackers ....
                                            I think you do not understand what we are talking about.

                                            We aren't talking about landing a few thousand Marines inside of Russia to remove their ability to hack or using cruise missiles to destroy their infrastructure so that another country is unable to hack. Instead, I believe we are talking about creating a cyberwarfare division where hacking attempts are identified and countered.

                                            This makes sense, although I question if the military should be used for this. This should be more of a Homeland Security thing.
                                            Herschel Savage
                                            Brooklyn, NY

                                            Comment

                                            • Phoenix
                                              BACON BACON BACON
                                              • Nov 2002
                                              • 35475

                                              #23
                                              Originally posted by Rochard
                                              Seems her email system in her basement was more secure than the email system at the White House....
                                              i assume you are talking about the whitehouse hack...which is not a sensitive website...nor did it hold any secrets.....of course you make a valid comparison
                                              Telegram PhoenixBrad
                                              https://quantads.io

                                              Comment

                                              • freecartoonporn
                                                Confirmed User
                                                • Jan 2012
                                                • 7683

                                                #24
                                                get prepared WW3 coming.
                                                SSD Cloud Server, VPS Server, Simple Cloud Hosting | DigitalOcean

                                                Comment

                                                • crockett
                                                  in a van by the river
                                                  • May 2003
                                                  • 76818

                                                  #25
                                                  Originally posted by Barry-xlovecam
                                                  1.) Better computer security.
                                                  2.) NSA should return the same type of cyberattack.

                                                  Cyber war is cyber war ...

                                                  That should be national policy.
                                                  We already do.. just our guys rarely get caught and when they do get caught states like China and Russia are too embarrassed to tell the public because they have to put up a big front of toughness.
                                                  In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                                                  Comment

                                                  • Sarn
                                                    WW3
                                                    • Sep 2015
                                                    • 12405

                                                    #26
                                                    Originally posted by crockett
                                                    We already do.. just our guys rarely get caught and when they do get caught states like China and Russia are too embarrassed to tell the public because they have to put up a big front of toughness.
                                                    I see hillary email dump post in public from London, from Assange.
                                                    Hillary gmail hacked by romanian.
                                                    Even snowden passport blocked when he go transit through Russia, and after that he start send information to "Gardian" and for Assange.
                                                    ----

                                                    Comment

                                                    • Sarn
                                                      WW3
                                                      • Sep 2015
                                                      • 12405

                                                      #27
                                                      Originally posted by Rochard
                                                      We aren't talking about landing a few thousand Marines inside of Russia to remove their ability to hack or using cruise missiles to destroy their infrastructure so that another country is unable to hack.
                                                      cruise missile need find not in Russia



                                                      ----

                                                      Comment

                                                      • crockett
                                                        in a van by the river
                                                        • May 2003
                                                        • 76818

                                                        #28
                                                        Hiding weapon systems within civilian zones is against the Geneva convention and puts your citizens in harms way.. However we are of course talking about a country who's military shot down a passenger jet 2 years ago..
                                                        In November, you can vote for America's next president or its first dictator.

                                                        Comment

                                                        • Sarn
                                                          WW3
                                                          • Sep 2015
                                                          • 12405

                                                          #29
                                                          Originally posted by crockett
                                                          Hiding weapon systems within civilian zones is against the Geneva convention and puts your citizens in harms way.. However we are of course talking about a country who's military shot down a passenger jet 2 years ago..
                                                          it nuke weapon))
                                                          and passenger jet drop in 23 year independent ukraine
                                                          ----

                                                          Comment

                                                          • pimpmaster9000
                                                            Too lazy to set a custom title
                                                            • Dec 2011
                                                            • 26730

                                                            #30
                                                            Originally posted by crockett
                                                            Hiding weapon systems within civilian zones is against the Geneva convention and puts your citizens in harms way.. However we are of course talking about a country who's military shot down a passenger jet 2 years ago..
                                                            napalming, agent organge-ing and cluster bombing civilians is against the geneva convention as well but it never stopped the USA from doing it
                                                            Report a suspicious cracker: Click Here

                                                            Comment

                                                            • Sarn
                                                              WW3
                                                              • Sep 2015
                                                              • 12405

                                                              #31
                                                              Originally posted by crucifissio
                                                              napalming, agent organge-ing and cluster bombing civilians is against the geneva convention as well but it never stopped the USA from doing it


                                                              ----

                                                              Comment

                                                              Working...