the only word McCain and Palin use as much as 'maverick' is 'Petraeus' - every time McCain says it i think of Jan Brady and 'Marcia Marcia Marcia' - 'Petraeus Petraeus Petraeus!"
I moved my sites to Vacares Hosting. I've saved money, my hair is thicker, lost some weight too! Thanks Sly!
Am I the only one who thinks Petraeus' name sounds like Betray-Us? I laugh every time I hear it in speeches, would you want to be led by general Betray-Us?
WG
Am I the only one who thinks Petraeus' name sounds like Betray-Us? I laugh every time I hear it in speeches, would you want to be led by general Betray-Us?
WG
What an original thought you just had, you sure you didnt get that from the Code Pink add?
the only word McCain and Palin use as much as 'maverick' is 'Petraeus' - every time McCain says it i think of Jan Brady and 'Marcia Marcia Marcia' - 'Petraeus Petraeus Petraeus!"
I found it funny when Bush was constantly using Petraeus' name over and over....he and McCain both talking about how we should listen to him.
I thought we lived in a country where Presidents give orders to generals, not the other way around.
Originally posted by Gouge
How strange, i didnt see anywhere in the article where Petraeus said negotiate. However Mark Carleton-Smith did.
That was the headline when I posted the link. It wouldn't be the first time yahoo changed one.
The end result is the same....he wants to sit down and talk with Taliban leaders.....quite possibly without "preconditions" of all things.
How strange, i didnt see anywhere in the article where Petraeus said negotiate. However Mark Carleton-Smith did.
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - U.S. Army Gen. David Petraeus said on Wednesday that negotiations with some members of the Taliban could provide a way to reduce violence in sections of Afghanistan gripped by an intensifying insurgency.
Petraeus said negotiations with insurgents willing to consider reconciliation could reduce violence by isolating hard-core militants, which is what occurred in Iraq's Anbar province when Sunni tribesmen joined U.S. forces against al Qaeda.
Umm...? Or were you looking at a different article?
The end result is the same....he wants to sit down and talk with Taliban leaders.....quite possibly without "preconditions" of all things.
This seems about as clear as day:
"If there are people who are willing to reconcile (with the government), then that would be a positive step in some of these areas that have actually been spiraling downward," said Petraeus, who will soon take up responsibility for U.S. operations in Afghanistan.
But, of course, he didn't use the word "precondition", so it's totally different.
How strange, i didnt see anywhere in the article where Petraeus said negotiate. However Mark Carleton-Smith did.
Did you read the first paragraph?
"U.S. Army Gen. David Petraeus said on Wednesday that negotiations with some members of the Taliban could provide a way to reduce violence in sections of Afghanistan gripped by an intensifying insurgency. "
The British Government negotiated a peace with the IRA, a terrorist organisation supported by many Americans, and the troubles ended. So why not try to end the problems?
Yes the Taliban will ask for the world, like the IRA did, and they will settle for what they can get. Like the IRA did. The people who supported the IRA saw the truth and wanted peace, they abandoned the IRA and left with no alternative the IRA had to cede many points. Some of the top IRA men and now in Government in Northern Ireland, even though they deny being in the IRA.
Talking around a table is the best way to stop a war. It stopped the war in Vietnam, Korea and others. Talking to the enemy is not a sign of weakness, it's a sign of strength.
"U.S. Army Gen. David Petraeus said on Wednesday that negotiations with some members of the Taliban could provide a way to reduce violence in sections of Afghanistan gripped by an intensifying insurgency. "
Yeah i read the article, reuters has a better in depth article on this very issue that clearly states as well as it being US policy that they would have to reconciliation with the Afghanistan goverment before we ever sat down at the table.
This is the same foreign policy thats been on the news for 6 years, nothing new here. Its the same tactic we used with the The Afghan Northern Alliance, or United Islamic Front for the Salvation of Afghanistan and it worked out like a charm.
Same plan, same tactic...reconciliation with the Afghanistan goverment first.
Yeah i read the article, reuters has a better in depth article on this very issue that clearly states as well as it being US policy that they would have to reconciliation with the Afghanistan goverment before we ever sat down at the table.
This is the same foreign policy thats been on the news for 6 years, nothing new here. Its the same tactic we used with the The Afghan Northern Alliance, or United Islamic Front for the Salvation of Afghanistan and it worked out like a charm.
Same plan, same tactic...reconciliation with the Afghanistan goverment first.
I live in your nightmares. I make you dream you're getting bumfucked by a razor blade only to wake up and find I gave your wife an enema and tube-fed you her shit.
Yeah i read the article, reuters has an article that I like better because it's more in line with my political beliefs and doesn't make it obvious that Petraeus wants to do with the Taliban what Obama has suggested doing with other rogue nations/organizations that McCain called him naive for.
Comment